Slashdot Mirror


Pain-free mice

mccalli writes: "Not input devices, but real live squeaky things. Apparently, Canadian scientists are trying to breed mice that do not feel pain. The eventual goal is a better pain killer for humans, but this is said to be a long way off. More in the Nature article here."

22 of 67 comments (clear)

  1. Is this so wise? by Dashslot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think one of the reasons we feel pain is so that we don't do stupid things...

    Be very close to fire.
    Touch very sharp things.
    Drink/spill other people's pints, or look at their women

    So if we now have painkillers that kill all pain, there are going to be a lot of mutillated people in future generations!

    1. Re:Is this so wise? by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I saw on Discovery Channel a girl who couldn't fell no pain at all. It was born like that, some sort of rare genetic disease. Well, as she grew up, she had severe burns, had broken almost all the bones at her body and died young of complications. This way we can learn how pain helps us.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    2. Re:Is this so wise? by bouvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, pain can be a message to stop doing whatever we're doing.

      However, our pain system is severely broken in an number of aspects, and effective pain treatement would be boon to suffers of chronic pain. E.g. an arthritis patient is probably well aware of the condition, and could do without the pain. Another example would be burn victims. Morphine can only do so much, and a pain killer which would block the pain and nothing else would have huge potentials.

      --
      --- In omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
    3. Re:Is this so wise? by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      However, our pain system is severely broken in an number of aspects

      I wouldn't call it "broken" -- it is still functioning perfectly to spec. Pain is supposed to signal our body that something is wrong. If you are burned, something is obviously wrong. If you have arthritis, then your cartelage is being basically eaten away, so something is also wrong. If you tear a ligament in your knee, even if the pain is excrutiating and constant, it is a reminder to stay off that knee until they pain goes away (which might be never, which I guess means to always be careful with that knee).

      While it would certainly be nice for people who already *know* that something is wrong, who have a disease that will give them pain for the rest of their life, to have some "ultra" pain-killer, it is still overriding a basic functionality of the body. Perhaps when our body "invented" pain, it wasn't considering modern medicine that allows people with these types of chronic problems to stay alive in the first place :)

    4. Re:Is this so wise? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't call it "broken" -- it is still functioning perfectly to spec.

      I'd say it's more of a kludge. It may meet the spec ("Have more pros than cons on average."), but it is far from an elegant solution. It would be much more useful if awareness of danger was simply placed into consciousness. But evolution is kludge central.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  2. even better... by gCGBD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... would be a pain killer that could cure a broken heart ...

    --

    O=='=++
  3. If I couldn't feel pain... by Bonker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then my weekly trips to Madame Zora's house of punishment would be a complete waste of time and money. I *like* my pain, dammit!

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  4. how outrageous by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so now the poor mice will be diseccted while alive

    animals are concious dammit

    they are not an IT

    I hope whoever is "inventing" this gets plenty of pain

    .

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:how outrageous by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      "Substance P" Inhibitors.

      Substance P is the chemical your brain releases to produce the "ouch". A neurotransmitter, Similar to Seratonin, Dopamine, etc.

      I don't know if anyone has made an inhibitor for it yet - or if its even possible; im not a neuroscientist. But I can think of situations where it would be a boon.

  5. Cool! by msouth · · Score: 2

    So, I'm guessing that this will be the end of PETA's objections to animal testing. Right? Yes?

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
    1. Re:Cool! by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      So, I'm guessing that this will be the end of PETA's objections to animal testing. Right? Yes?

      That would require PETA to be rational, scientifically well informed, and intellectually honest, none of which are the case.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    2. Re:Cool! by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

      They would still suffer from fear and other forms of stress.

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    3. Re:Cool! by msouth · · Score: 2

      The joke was supposed to be that PETA probably wouldn't look too kindly on the production of such an animal in the first place, much less approve of using it once you have created it.

      --
      Liberty uber alles.
    4. Re:Cool! by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      Changing their position based on this new breed of mice would not demonstrate any of those qualities in PETA.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  6. There are people born like this, actually... by Ieshan · · Score: 3, Informative

    They die at a very young age, it's an extremely serious disorder. If you don't feel pain, when your skeleton or muscles are in a position where they are enduring pressure or other outside forces, being damaged, or otherwise, you don't adjust the problem. Therefore, the people have horrible defects caused by this - imagine sleeping completely crooked for thirty days in a row.

    Also, it's likely for them to die as young children, in all seriousness, especially in today's society, where clothes cover most of the body (and hide potential injuries) and the child will not scream in pain.

  7. Leprosy? by Polo · · Score: 2

    If you can't feel pain, you have leprosy. Then you can hurt yourself and you'll never notice
    the damage.

    1. Re:Leprosy? by Polo · · Score: 2

      However I believe many problems with leprosy are actually the result of feeling no pain.

      There's a book about this: "Pain: the gift nobody wants" by Paul Brand I believe.

      Here's a description I found

    2. Re:Leprosy? by Polo · · Score: 2

      Duh, logic error. I should have stated: for some A, then B. For some cases of leprosy, then you cannot feel pain.

      Lack of pain can allow bodily damage to go unnoticed and lead to loss of limb and/or life.

  8. Re:Logic-o-rama by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    If the consequence of you not knowing C++ was me strapping you to a table and repeatedly pouring oxidising chemicals into your eyes would you prefer me to give you the benefit of the doubt?

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  9. Implications of this research. by Guppy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm seeing a lot of "Pain is good/useful" and "Animal experimentation is bad" posts. I believe the implications of this research could be much broader.

    In the US, pain has traditionally been undertreated. The reason is that the most effective agents for chronic and severe pain, narcotics, are tightly controlled (for obvious reasons). Doctors which write more prescriptions than average quickly find themselves the object of regulatory scrutiny, while patients who ask for narcotics may be suspected of being addicts.

    In recent times, this has started to ease a little bit (especially for Cancer and terminal diseases), however, it's still very much a problem in cases where diagnosing the severity of the pain relies on the patient's own testimony (Such as for many nerve conditions), or where a chronic conditions requires long-term use of painkillers. It's also a problem for minorities and the poor, who especially tend to be undertreated.

    The writers of this Nature article have been careful to note that there are no immediate practical applications from this research -- having pain-free mice running around simply isn't all that useful. However, although there were guesses as to the function of DREAM [the protein of interest], as the article states, prior to this work "It was very unpredictable what DREAM would be doing physiologically".

    So, now what you have is a target gene and protein in hand, with which you can do things like obtain structural information, or design high-throughput in-vitro screens for drug development. The eventual goal would be something which works as a powerful painkiller, yet does not have any addictive potential -- thus allowing it to be used more freely. And even if this particular target doesn't lead to such a drug, it illuminates another part of the complex, and still poorly understood, process by which we feel pain.

    1. Re:Implications of this research. by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      I guess the pain-free mice could be used as an additional type of control group for testing new painkillers.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  10. Re:Here I come to save the day! by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

    I think he's asking to be modded down, because that is so obviously un-funny :)