Slashdot Mirror


Sandia Builds Micromechanical 'Device Driver'

DanielRavenNest writes: "Sandia Labs has built a tiny bicycle chain type drive out of silicon. This allows one micromechanical motor to drive multiple devices scattered about a chip."

20 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Moving parts bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Solid-state good.

    This looks like more solutions to non-problems.

  2. Please do not mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This was taken verbatim from the article.

  3. Re:actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Informative my ass. This jerk just copied a paragraph from the article so he could get FP -- and then he didn't even claim FP!

  4. Rejected again... by tramm · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    * 2002-01-15 15:51:31 Sandia Labs produces micro-machine chain links (articles,science) (rejected)

    Perhaps I should have selected "Technology" rather than "Science". Anyway, I found it at robots.net, another mod_virgule site. Get your robot news there first!

    --
    -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
    1. Re:Rejected again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      diddums

  5. I Like to Watch, by Christ Korda of CoE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The flame shooting out
    People dive into the street
    While I play with my meat
    My steel melted
    and my tower's coming down

    The New York skyline
    Will never be the same
    But the guys who flew those planes
    Had fucking amazing aim
    I like to watch

    There must have been a reason
    But I don't understand
    Why they hit the Pentagon
    Instead of Disneyland
    I like to watch

    I like to watch
    The plane going in
    I like to watch
    The flame shooting out
    It's raining broken glass
    While I sit on my ass
    My steel melted
    and my tower's coming down

    I'd almost had enough
    Of watching planes explode
    Until they showed it in reverse
    And I had to shoot my load
    I like to watch

    Now my hand's all sticky
    And I can't find a rag
    I guess I'll have to use
    The american flag
    I like to watch

    http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/catalog/video. ht ml

  6. I claim first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Since you didn't, you nut-licking shit-muncher.

  7. Re:[mirror] Google's Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    informative my ass, get rid of this ranking/modding thing, it helps assholes become bigger assholes

  8. Re:Reliability? (Mod: OT) by SirSlud · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    > Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy

    Since when did secure go hand in hand with ease?

    We stick with FreeBSD .. ease is a matter of context, and security (akas: kernal/security mailing-list anality) is about as good as it gets. Can you point me towards a non-slackware-biased source that can break it down for me?

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  9. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    How the FUCK can you post shit like that with your +1 bonus.

    I browse at +2, to avoid all the shit, and there comes your crap post!

    It's not that hard - tick the box saying No Score +1 Bonus.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      WTF are you talking about? The parent probably did not have the +1 bonus checked. He probably got modded up. Duh!

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Click on the post number link of the post in question. You'll see that it has been modded (when I looked at it) +1 Funny and -1 Overrated, leaving it at a 2. So it was originally posted with +1. Duh.

  10. Re:[mirror] Google's Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    "it helps assholes become bigger assholes"

    Now I understand what happened to the poor guy in the picture.

  11. Re:Reliability? (Mod: OT) by FrostedChaos · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Since when did secure go hand in hand with ease?

    Ever since computers were run by human beings, who tend to make mistakes when technology becomes unecessarily complicated.


    FreeBSD does indeed have a good reputation for security, but not for the reasons you suggest. Also, the slackware user you responded to probably thinks slack is easier because he's been using it for so long, rather than because of any particularly well-made interface (slackware is very minimalist.)

    --
    "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  12. Re:This seems like the ideal primer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    THE MENTIFEX TUTORIAL

    In your intended programming language, first make sure that the language will permit you to write a never-ending program that endlessly performs its own computations while only occasionally or periodically checking for input from a human ser.
    The AI must never stop thinking in order to wait for human input.

    Now, prepare to implement your chosen theory of mind. You may study the theory of mind associated with Mind.Forth and either accept or reject it, or modify it, or you may have a theory that you have developed yourself or found in the course of your studies. In any event, you must conceptualize the theory of mind thoroughly enough
    to implement it in software.
    CLICK FOR MORE INFORMATION

  13. Re:How are these made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You've just never done anything really hard.

  14. Gears on the chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The gears on the chip goes around and around,
    round and round, round and round,
    The gears on the chip goes round and round,
    round and round, round and round,
    All through the compile,

    The fans on the heat sink goes, whirly whirly, whirl,
    whirly whirly whirl, whirly whirly whirl
    The fans on the heat sink goes, whirly whirly,
    All through the compile,

    The tranistors in the cpu goes open and shut,
    open and shut, open and shut,
    The tranistors on the cpu goes open and shut,
    open and shut, open and shut,
    All through the compile

    The hard drive in the box goes "click click click"
    click click click, click click click
    The hard drive in the box goes "click click click"
    All through the compile

  15. Bahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    much funnier than the one you replied to. if i had some mod points..

  16. Re:Completely useless for nano-motorbikes by Dasein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It depends on what you're doing with it. If you want to go a few thousands of miles without chain goo slinging off onto your nice, clean Kilamanjaro Jacket then shaft drive is the way to go.

    However, shaft driven bikes (with the exception of some BMWs) exhibit "shaft-jacking" meaning that the back end of the bike will lift up an extra inch or so under heavy acceleration making the suspension less pliant and potentially upsetting a rider who pushing the bike hard.

    Belts, (IMHO) just don't cut it. There's a reason why you don't see them on world superbike machines. The only roadracing bikes to use them are Buells. But they're a segregated into a seperate class.

    Chains, however, seem to handle the 170HP of a Honda SP2 racebike (2001 SP1 Specs) just fine.

    Yes, I'm a geek -- even about cool stuff like motorcycles.

    --
    You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
  17. Re:Oh damn, by arkanes · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Well, Real Soon Now(tm), you'll be the most employable octegenarian on the block!