Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Should Public Funds Mean Public Code?

Posted by timothy on from the commonweal dept.

Lisa points to this article on oreillynet with "two opposing viewpoints on whether all software created by publicly funded research should be licensed as open source, and the chance to weigh in yourself." Open-source software (under whatever license) seems to me like a good way to multiply the investment of tax dollars that public funding relies on, but the counterarguments offered here are interesting.

3 of 465 comments (clear)

  1. S3c0n3d Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    0wn3d bitches

  2. Label me flamebait you dogmatists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Assholes.

    Try thinking for yourselves sometimes.

    Fucking servants.

  3. Yeah, but what I want is... by eabell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, yeah, open source software, that's all well and go.

    But I know that my share of the tax money is going to pay for fighter jets, not software. I'd like to take one out for a spin next weekend. They are, after all, purchased with my tax dollars.

    So where do I sign up?