Corporate America Wary of Subscription Software
medical_geek writes: "According to this
article
on cio.com,
MS's subscription service is failing in the business world. I guess
that personal users are not the only group that balks at paying a yearly
fee for software. My question is have you at your job bit the bullet
and signed up as an early adopter, or are you rolling the dice and seeing
if this experiment fails?" This article focuses only on Microsoft, but the same analysis probably explains why ASPs haven't taken off like they were supposed to, either.
everybody lies with performance figures. you should be fired for not evaluating your purchases properly.
update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315
Either that, or you were selling useless garbage that could be done locally for no subscription cost.
I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
"The problem is that WinXP adds nothing to Win2k from a corporate point of view. "
.Net Server and will be released later this year, probably Q3 from what I've heard.
/.
That's not true.
"The new GUI? No use, since the older one is known by the users since 95, and the new one can be disorienting, despite Microsoft's claim of the contrary. Re-training is expensive. "
Oh no! Having frequently used icons in the start menu is disorienting. Oh my god!
".net? Pure vaporware so far as far as real-world applications go. "
No more so than using Linux.
"Server-side, WinXP is just not there(TM), and it offers a total amount of nothing over win2k. "
Furthering showing the author is clueless. There is no WinXP server product. The new server product is called
"Also, software compatibility is still to be tested."
It's actually pretty good.
It appears to be babbling nonsense day on