Slashdot Mirror
AOL in Negotiations to Buy Red Hat?
bstadil sent in this rumor. The Washington Post isn't exactly a rumor site, so there's probably truth behind it. Wow. It would make a great deal of sense for AOL/Time-Warner to acquire an operating system for leverage against Microsoft - same reason they bought Netscape.
...Sony Corp.'s PlayStation 2 video-game console. Linux also runs the Sony product.
The Washington Post may not be a rumor site, but they are not exactly Scientific American, either. Playstation 2 is not run by Linux, of course, although some of their development tools are.
AOL did buy Nullsoft, and then they made Winamp freeware. So, for once, AOL did good.
Netscape 4's perhaps, but with regard to IE 6 vs. Mozilla 0.9.8 (effectively Netscape 6.3; 0.9.8 is due to be released in a week), I have to hand this round to Mozilla. Mozilla starts faster than IE, supports more CSS, supports XHTML (as opposed to IE just bailing and dumping the XML tree),
My webpage is Fully Compliant XHTML 1.0 Transitional and renders better in IE 6.0 than in Mozilla (as text and images not this "dumping the XML tree that you speak of). Mozilla is a great browser but when I see people spreading lies in an effort to spread its usage I feel disgusted.
Let the browser stand on its own merits instead of spreading FUD to promote it. This sullies the name of Mozilla and all that work on it.
Yahoo Messenger has an official Linux client, works great. It's bit light on features compared to the Windows version, but the functionality is there.
In fact, all it really needs is a feature to flash the icon in the taskbar when a message comes in. Anyone know how to make it do that?
I've tried some of the other Yahoo! clients people have made. Frankly none of them compares to the "official" client.
What, pray tell, will M$ be able to offer AOL? Microsoft never ever held anything back. It's apparent that MicroSquish is trying to conquer all media on the PC with their goofey and inferior "standards". It's apparent that they are trying to move all PC users to the M$Notwork, with invasive advert cramming, spyware and general sleezyness for all. It's also apparent that they are trying to use their desktop share to force such bizare and awful protocalls as activeX on everyone. What will be left for anyone else in such a world? What can AOL do to help M$ achieve this, and what would they offer AOL for their complience? Will they offer to not break Netscape again? Right, who believes that one? M$ thinks it does not need AOL, and their corperate strategy makes no provisions for any other ISP but themselves.
How wrong they are. If any sizable portion of AOL users moved to Linux, M$ would be doomed. There are 100 million or so AOL users out there, almost all of them on M$ platforms. Every year, a substantial proportion of them feel forced to "upgrade" their computer due to M$ induced bit rot. What AOL can now do is offer a free OS that works to those people, who are going to throw the old computer away! Why would they not give it a try? Then swoosh, millions of Linux users are born. Did you hear that? It's the sound of M$'s PC share going to hell and all their power with it.
DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
What the heck are you talking about?!
iPlanet had VERY little to do with the AOL you hate - it was Netscape people and Sun people selling Netscape and Sun software bundles.
Very LITTLE of AOL's infrastructure runs on Microsoft. The vast majority runs on either UNIX or on Tandem fault-tolerant minis. When I left last year, some folks were beginning to play with LINUX now that it was becoming more reliable. Only one thing I can think of runs on NT.
The only "AOL infrastructure" that relies on Microsoft is the word-processing infrastructure.
Jay, the ex-Mail Guy
FWIW, Mozilla does all these things.
you know, the actual differences between the IE, Moz & Opera clients is easier to code round than all that if(NS) else if(IE) crap
// el is a CSSStyleDeclaration
for instance
IE lacks getElementById for a document
so the solution is far simpler than
if(IE)
el = document.all["someID"]
else
el = getElementById["someID"]
just add the functionality to the document
if (IE)
getElementById = function (id) { return document.all[id] }
than your code can become more cross platform
I use this technique in my JS and it works a treat
NS doesn't have pixelWidth
solution :
if (NS) {
getPixelWidth = function (el) {
return el.width;
}
setPixelWidth = function (el, w) {
el.width = w;
return el.width;
}
} else {
getPixelWidth = function (el) {
return el.pixelWidth;
}
setPixelWidth = function (el, w) {
el.pixelWidth = w;
return el.pixelWidth;
}
}
these are examples without error checking etc. but using this technique is pretty time saving I can tell you because you gradually build a library of the stuff you use and all the browser dependent stuff only gets executed once at page load.
There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
I just extracted emails and address book for a former AOL user. AOL uses some foully nonstandard database to store 'em in, but the essentials are still there in text. I had only a small job to do so just used LIST (yes, Vern Buerg's old LIST.COM, in a DOS window) to read the raw files and copy out the needful data. For a larger job, try XRAY, which you can get from Simtel, IIRC in the DOS/TextUtils section. It does a really good job of extracting whatever ASCII text is inside ANY file. Redirects to a file or an external viewer (frex, List :) in the usual manner for DOS utils.
:)
I've also used XRAY to extract the meat from Word documents that were mangled beyond repair.
And still they try to tell us DOS is dead.
~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
AOLserverruns big parts of aol.com and digitalcity.com. Say what you may about the quality of AOL's services, but when was the last time you heard of either of those websites going down? Or getting hacked?
Taken from an article on MSNBC
The AOL online software, which consumers can install for free from the Web or a compact disk, is now designed to run on Microsoft's Windows operating system. But the AOL software could be configured to override Windows and launch a version of Red Hat's Linux operating system, sources said.
I hope this wouldn't be done by default. There had better be a lot of warnings indicating that the disk was about to be reformatted and that data could (and probably would) be lost.
Now, I have no problem with Windows being overwritten. I just hope end users are made fully aware of the potential risks to their data.
Pooty tweet
I don't think that your point holds now, though it may have when you first signed up with AOL UK.
Over the holidays I was back to the UK and just switched my mother over to BT openworld's 24x7 thing - unlimited use via 0800 number, 15 quid a month all in, works fine with Linux (I even used RH7.2 GUI dialup config). I don't see a big benefit of using AOL over that.
Being stuck with AOL just because you have an aol.co.uk address is a different matter - I guess you could use AOL's mail server from someone else's dialup, but that adds cost and defeats the purpose
Maybe OFTEL should get involved and enforce "email portability" on ISP's?