Slashdot Mirror


Temp Troops of High-Tech

A submitter sends in this story about temp work in Silicon Valley, from the point of view of the temp. Compare almost the same story written from the point of view of Amazon.com's management.

10 of 476 comments (clear)

  1. high tech also means low tech by Reinout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is mention in the beginning of the article about it being strange to have so much non-hightech work in such a hightech-area. That's not so strange if you think about it. The whole ecommerce thing is about selling stuff. The stuff that gets sold normally can't be send over the internet, so you need FedEx, the postal service, etc. What they're missing out on letters that get send, they're gaining in packages...

    And the high-tech (?) printers and so also in the end need packaging, sending, assembling. You can automate some parts, but...

    When you read a story like this, it just keeps reminding me of early 20th century conditions that made socialists movements all too understandable... Some people just don't seem to care. Or not to be allowed to care by some system...

    Reinout

  2. The world economy. by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The world economy has always been built upon the backs of a 'disposable' workforce.
    Let's face it, paying minimum wage to people is cheaper than automating a production line (and of course, they can argue that they are providing valuable jobs).
    It's heavy handed and unethical (IHMO) but companies (with a _few_ limited exceptions) are only interested in the bottom line.
    I've done the temping thing for a while, and there was certainly variety (like I'd be in a different job every week), but you are also treated as little more than 'an extra body'. They can get another one easily enough, so they can get you to work, trample on you, and if you go replace you in a day.
    (Much happier now I'm working full time doing 'skilled' rather than manual labour. Least this way I get a month's notice before being told to walk)

    1. Re:The world economy. by mip · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Capitalist economies require a pool of unemployed workers to allow for continued growth. Full employment is bad news for such a system. Read this page for further details.

      On unemployment it says that it is a necessary condition for a capitalist system, as long as it doesn't get too high - it is upto the individual to find employment and change their status. Capitalism is economic individualism.

      Should society look after the people or should the people look after themselves? I think, as in all things, balance is required.

  3. A picture of everyday business in America by buckeyeguy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I worked a few awful temp jobs shortly after getting out of college (back when 'entry level' stuff didn't exist in IT), so I can sympathize with the narrator of the Silicon Valley story.

    But at the same time, this story happens in thousands of businesses around the country, every day of the year. The pay is low, the work is tedious, and the management oppressive and degrading. Where I work now, the fulfillment center is the major part of our company... supply-chain services, as it is being touted nowadays. It's the 'new economy' that was made so much around the start of 2000... but it's still the same old labor-intensive machine. So, IMHO, there's really little news to see here, for those of us who have worked outside the cubicle.

    And temp agencies? Don't even get me started...

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  4. Is government really obsolete? by Denito · · Score: 5, Insightful


    One of the most common sentiments on slashdot is how backwards governments are and how technology makes them obsolete.

    But you see something like this-- maybe things like workplace safety standards are still important...
    With all the libertarian sentiment here on /., its easy to forget the role that wired or not, there might still be an important role for gov...

  5. Re:That's Life by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not everybody can both live where they want to live and have the ideal job. If there aren't any decent jobs available in your area... news flash... you may have to move.

    That's right! To hell with your family that lives in the area. If you mother's cancer kills her while you're 2,000 miles away, so what? You'll be living where the good jobs are.

    You need a clue. Some people have family ties, kids that they don't want to yank out of school and away from their friends, and other circumstances that make becoming a nomad to chase jobs around the country impossible.

    That's just the way it is. Reality bites...

    So no one should have a social conscience or work to improve the realities of life? Maybe Jonas Salk should have just said "People get polio. Reality bites" and then moved on...

  6. Been There by ScumBiker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having been a temp worker in Florida, back in the early '80s, I can really sympathize with the article. It totally sucks not knowing if you can even pay the rent, much less eat. I was working at a pc board plant. Something like 80% of the workers were temp. Everybody was scared of getting shitcanned. The pay was terrible and the managers/supervisors constantly screamed and threatened people. Lovely environment, in other words. Thank managed to pull myself out of that morass and moved forward.

    All I can say to people that are trying to live on temp work is, get to school! Somehow, anyhow. I don't care if it's tech school for one semester. Even that little bit of knowledge can help. Also, learn English. Learn how to speak it so that even slow midwestern people like me can understand you. I know it's challenging to the extreme, but my ancestors came here and had to do the same thing. BTW, I'm *not* trying to flame or be prejudiced here, I'm simply trying to state facts. Please read and judge accordingly.

    --
    --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  7. The alternative by slow_flight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, so it looks like the consensus here is that these poor folks are being used and abused, and Big Business just doesn't care.

    What's the alternative? Pay them $20 and hour and let them come and go as they please, or stop the line whenever they want to chat about their weekend? How willing are you to pay $500 for a printer that currently costs $125?

    If this story was about HP automating the box line and putting some number of temp workers out on the street, or moving the work to Mexico where the labor costs are even lower, would that be better?

    Temp work exists for a reason. I have done temp work myself. My view of it was work I could get at the drop of a hat, and quit the same way. If you need to work for 3 weeks, are you going to take a job somewhere knowing full well you're only going to be there 3 weeks? Yes, there are perma-temps, and there are inarguably strong financial incentives on the part of the company to staff in that manner, but the cold, hard reality is that this is the kind of migrant labor these workers chose. Granted, they probably didn't have a whole lot of options to choose from, but it's not like some recruiter painted a rosy picture of temp-Nirvana to these people. They made a fully-informed decision to accept the work, and given the angst shown over being laid-off, seemed to appreciate that they had work at all.

    --

    Karma: Professionally Doomed (mostly affected by inability to keep opinions to self)
  8. Re:Workers already have the power! by anomaly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With all due respect, I'm no superman, and you wouldn't have to be superman to do it either.

    I went to school with some brilliant people, but I also went to school with some folks who weren't the sharpest knives in the drawer, either.

    For example, my senior year I was in an all-out run for head of one class against a man who was a laid-off coal miner.

    Nice guy, but on his best day, he had an average IQ. On his BEST day. One thing this guy had was a work ethic. He put in more hours than could be counted to make up for his lack of mental capacity, and it paid off in spades! This guy was the top of his classes because of the sweat equity.

    If Carl could succeed in school, anyone could. He was a hard worker with a family. Certainly he and his family made huge sacrifices to get him through college, but that was his choice, too.

    I've heard that Henry Ford said something to the effect of "If you think you can, or you think you can't, you're right."

    Let's inspire people to achieve rather than focus on limitations. Let's help people choose to make a better way for themselves rather than stay stuck in the mire.

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  9. Re:Workers already have the power! by haruharaharu · · Score: 5, Funny

    This reminds me of a woman I have heard of; she has an IQ of around 75 and a PHD. People ask her how she could possible do that with such a low IQ. "It just takes longer."

    --
    Reboot macht Frei.