Slashdot Mirror


Review: Kung Pow

Well, some of you warned me, and you were right. Kung Pow - Enter the Fist had a great premise and the trailers were tantalizing. Steve Oedekerk borrowed from Woody Allen's What's Up Tiger Lily? to make a Kung Fu spoof patched together from a little known 1976 karate film Tiger and Crane Fists. But the result is anything but funny. Spoilage warning: plot discussed, not ending.

This one should have worked. Oedekerk, writer and director of this mediocrity, is also the star. He uses digital film-editing techniques to insert himself into the older film as the new hero, a creative idea that in better hands could really have been funny.

The Chosen One saw his family killed by the evil Master Pain/Betty and was raised by rodents. He finds his way to Master Tang, then falls in love with Tang's daughter Ling, who speaks in a perpetual whine. The stop-action overdubs and hesitations are funny at first, but then are just headache-inducing. There are a few inspired moments -- I personally loved the karate brawl with the dairy cow -- but the movie derails as he comes closer and closer to his confrontation with Master Pain.

Don't be fooled by the trailers. Every funny scene is in them. There are few movies I can't sit through, but this one was a struggle. It really isn't worth much more discussion, and my best advice would be to skip it altogether.

23 of 211 comments (clear)

  1. I agree, skip it by frostgiant · · Score: 4, Funny

    I saw this movie and... yuck!
    I guess I should've known... The previews said "From the director of Ace Ventura 2". I don't know if you've ever seen Ace Ventura 2 or not, but let's just say it sucked.

    Go see "A Beautiful Mind" if you haven't already, it is much, much better.

  2. Those trailers were terrible by LatJoor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the trailers were tantalizing

    No, the trailers were terrible. How anyone could want to see a movie based on those trailers is beyond me. Yet another spoof on The Matrix, this time with a cow? A guy being distracted by a woman with big breasts? And these are the highlights? This was just another me-too addition to the new genre of 'genre parodies' to come out in the last few years, and obviously not an inspired newcomer.

    1. Re:Those trailers were terrible by jafiwam · · Score: 3, Informative

      A guy being distracted by a woman with big breasts?

      A guy being distracted by a woman with one big breast.

  3. Its hard to imagine.... by nizo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...any movie I would want to see less, given the trailer. On the upside, I am guessing that if I did go see the movie, I wouldn't be disappointed; at least I KNOW it sucks, where these days often the trailer deceives me so......

  4. Do we boycott the MPAA every other week or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Let's boycott the MPAA... until there's some idiotic looking spoof movie I really want to see."

  5. A real review by Papa+Legba · · Score: 5, Funny



    "Not worth stealing. Two cds better used to rip John Tesh MP3s and archiving them for eternity"

    ---Internet piracy council

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:A real review by GreenHell · · Score: 3, Redundant

      More reviews (Not that many right now actually, more are added as more reviews are published)

      Right now, my favorite's the one that says "It could well end up being the worst movie of 2002. It's that bad."

      I'm still trying to figure out how anyone could have found the trailers interesting though...

      --
      "I won't mod you down - I feel the need to call you a twit explicitly, rather than by implication."
  6. I thought it had one shot value by staticdragon · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    My Opinion of the movie: It was probably the worst movie I have ever sat through in a movie theater (never wasted money on Battlefield Earth) but despite how horrible it was I laughed my ass off the entire movie. Now, when a second group of friends invited me to go see it with them, I told them there weren't enough tea in China...

    1. Re:I thought it had one shot value by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shut up, you filfthy man-animal!

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  7. Re:he thought the trailers made it look good? by QuasEye · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I know I watched them, and thought that it could be one of two things:
    • Inspired stupidity. Think like the Airplane/early Naked Gun movies, where the gags are admittedly dumb, but dumb in such a creative, random way that there's a subversive intellectual quality underneath them.
    • Attempted inspired stupidity. They tried, but fell short. Problem is, falling short at all is death to this genre. I'm not sure why, but it seems to be an all or nothing thing.



    Unfortunately, the former comes along very rarely, and the latter comes around very often. Needless to say, I didn't hold much hope.

  8. Jeez Katz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You know, I'd take your movie reviews more seriously (especially the negative ones), if you didn't spend so much time watching so much crap and then coming here to tell us how it's all crap and we could do better.

    Need to see what I mean? Your review list lately reads like a direct-to-DVD-bargain-box roll call.

    Good movies that have come out in that time span:
    • Lord of the Rings
    • A Beautiful Mind
    • Ocean's Eleven
    • Gosford Park
    • Ali

    What's up, Katz? Afraid of actually cutting your teeth on something substantial?
    1. Re:Jeez Katz... by cheinonen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If he really wants to do reviews of films that people might acually use, why doesn't he go see some movies that aren't massive blockbusters? In the past two months, he could have gone to see In The Bedroom, The Royal Tenenbaums, Brotherhood of the Wolf (though I didn't like it), Amelie (best movie of last year, bar none), or Monsters Ball, which are smaller movies that people might acually go see if they read a good review of them. Kung Pow and Orange County have been showing me trailers for two months and they've looked stupid the whole time. Come on, do we really need Katz to do a review of Lord of the Rings? Was anyone NOT going to see it?

  9. Oh lighten up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I went to see Kung Pow expecting a low budget spoof of cheezy Kung Fu movies, and that's exactly what I got. This movie obviously wasn't aimed at up-tight no-nothings like Katz, it was meant for Kung Fu fan boys.

    Katz's review reminds me of all the bad press Godzilla 2000 got when it came out. People whined about it's crappy plot and terrible special effects... That's the whole point!

    Of course a bad review from Katz can do nothing but help the movie out in the box office. Anything that idiot hates must be good.

  10. ya but.. by AA0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    this guys too hard a critic. I mean, he'd probably give Booty Call 2 a bad review.

  11. Re:he thought the trailers made it look good? by grammar+nazi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Inspired stupidity. Think like the Airplane/early Naked Gun movies, where the gags are admittedly dumb, but dumb in such a creative, random way that there's a subversive intellectual quality underneath them.
    Back in college, I would have agreed with you. I've heard this argument applied to anime, Monte Python, Simpsons, 3-stooges, Laurel and Hardy, and many other things.

    Now though, I realize that there's no subversive intellect. It's just that smart people and dumb people both find the same slapstick humor funny. It doesn't make me smarter than somebody else if I see furter into a dumb joke than they do, because it's still a dumb joke. Just think about it for a second and I'm sure that you will agree.

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  12. Review? by UberOogie · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm sorry, that wasn't a review. That was barely a TV Guide summary of the movie.

    Amongst all all the other faults Katz has (*coughCommie64splayingmoviesinKabulcough*), his movie reviews tend to be nothing if he can't bring out one of his dead horses (Columbine, geek prejudice, globalism) to beat. And even then, it has no actual bearing on the movie review.

    And why is this even being reviewed here? Jesus, if Katz can't make at least a tenuous connection with some of his tropes, how does this fit "News For Nerds, Stuff That Matters"?

    And, granted that this was likely a horribly bad movie from everything I've seen on it and heard from others, Katz is still supposedly getting paid for this "work," so he can at least put some effort into it. I mean, hell, Mr. Cranky devoted more words to his review.

    --
    "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    1. Re:Review? by UberOogie · · Score: 4
      Evan, honey, if you actually believe the "Message From Kabul" story, you're not one to be calling people a moron.

      I understand that Commodore made other machines besides the 64. I own two. Hell, I still play with the 128 from time to time, but the Amiga crapped out and I haven't had time to fix it. It was just funnier that way.

      And while I acknowledge that the scenario (movies onto Commodore machines) is technologically possible, there is no way that a week after the liberation of a city in one of the most war-damaged "cities" in the world, that there was some linox haxor downloading full Hollywood movies over non-existant 28.8 ISP connections.

      And that's just one part of the story that's credability-bending.

      Katz has had plenty of time and prompting to prove his outrageous fabrication, but has not done so. I know that I would publically apologise to him for everything bad I ever said about him if he could document it to my satisfaction. But he can't, because he made it up and is now trying to brush it under the rug.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    2. Re:Review? by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A pundit who just gives his opinions on something, and doesn't care about investigating what he or she is writing, isn't really contributing much.

      That pretty much describes Slashdot.

      Okay, now that you've had your laugh, that's not actually a bad thing. A good pundit will toss out themes and concepts for the general population to chew on and discuss. I know that in most threads on Slashdot that I get involved in, one of three things happen (usually a small amount of all three): I am moved to change my position, I am exposed to a different position with at least some validity, or in stating my existing position and being questioned, I build up my own existing beliefs and strengthen them.

      Slashdot: A Million Pundits Arguing. Not all that bad a description, and not really that bad a thing. Of course, it's also nice to be in a forum where a Google search or peek into the online Brittanica or CIA World Fact Book can buttress your arguement. That eliminates all but the most pigheaded "But my uncle said Afgans are all rich" idiots.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  13. A REAL REVIEW! by batkiwi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think katz actually saw the movie, I think he got a friend's grumpy grandfather to see it and tell him what it was.

    This movie can be compared to one thing, and one thing only:
    An entire movie made off of the bruce lee spoof in kentucky fried movie.

    If you like naked gun/etc, you'll like this. If you don't, then what the fuck are you seeing a movie called "Kung Pow" for?

    Two people walked out in the middle of the movie.
    The other 60 of us in the theatre were falling on the floor we were laughing so much!

    This movie is about one thing, and one thing only:
    PHOTOSHOPPING.

    You know all those pictures of person X put into background Y? This is an entire movie of it.

    They took an old, REALLY BAD, 1970's kung fu film, and with a TON a greenscreen and computer wizardry, as well as some really bad dubbing, made their own movie out of it.

    Only the main character is "real." All of the other people/scenes/etc were from the cheezy old kung fu film. In the credits they show you some of the wizardry (before and after shots) and it's REALLY amazing.

    There is tons of changed faces, added people, time change bizzarement.

    You know when you and your friends are drunk, 2am, watching a kung fu movie and you start adding your own lines, and acting out parts? That's this movie.

    If you're into the photoshopping scene, you've GOT to check out this movie. Maybe wait for dvd if you're not into silly-stupid-drunken-funny humour, but check it out.

    I am eagerly awaiting the DVD... I hope they show more of the before/after/in progress stuff. It's amazing to see a scene of the original, then watch it again to see a completely new scene made out of it, with new people/etc added in.

    HERE'S MY SCALE OF 1-10 ratings:
    SOPHISTICATED WIT: 0
    JUST REALLY FUCKING FUNNY: 10
    PLOT: N/A
    TECHINCAL WIZARDRY: 10
    ACTING: N/A
    WACKYNESS: 10

    MY overall score: 9

    Like I said, if you like:
    -kentucky fried movie (bruce lee segment)
    -naked gun
    -crazy mad editing
    you'll love this movie.

    If you're not into at least 2 of the 3 above, you'll hate it.

  14. Re:he thought the trailers made it look good? by CaseyB · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think it's all about execution. Monty Python and the early Zucker Bros. films had incredible comedic talent and great direction. When you pull off slapstick with such style and with such subtle nuance, it's funny no matter how lowbrow the content.

    Perhaps when people that normally find slapstick humor boring catch themselves laughing at these movies, they just have to invent the "subversive intellectual quality" as an excuse.

  15. Re:Do we boycott the MPAA every other week or what by parliboy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Er... no, you only go see the movies that are worth your time, or at least wait til they hit the dollar theatre. In the last months, I've only seen a limited number of first-run movies: Shrek, Final Fantasy (which I know kinda sucked, but I still wanted to support the cause an view it for its aesthetics), Crouching Tiger (my second viewing), Monsters Inc. (I didn't pay, so I can't argue), and LOTR.

    Point to that waste of bandwidth is, I paid for movies that were truly worth it or that I had to see, and I just found something else to do with the rest of my time (as another thread points out, sacrificing one movie pretty much pays for one month of a MMO game). Don't boycott, just be judicious in what you see, and be willing to defend yourself when others try to convince you. Were my friend so strong, I wouldn't have convinced him to see Scary Movie. I still don't think he's fully forgiven me for that night...

    --
    "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
  16. Wrong title in America by _ganja_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apprently Donald Rumsfeld wants the name of the movie changed to "Kung illegal combatants".

    --

    A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

  17. I Changed Steve Oedekerk Show's Name by waldoj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sometime back in '96 (if memory serves), Steve Odekerk had a one-shot show on NBC, some kind of cyber-stand-up kind of a thing. (I'm a little sketchy on the details.) The name of the show was "steveodekerk.com." Being a mischevious young 2600-writing dork, I looked it up, and found that the domain wasn't registered. Naturally, I registered it. (This was in the heady days of no-cash-down-required domain name registrations.)

    A week passed. Nothing happened. Then something minor, but interesting, happened: they changed the name of the show. Now it was "steve.odekerk.com." They'd registered odekerk.com, lacking their own domain name.

    That was one of the greatest achievements of my 18-year-old life: getting NBC to change the name of a show. I'm not saying that was a worthwhile endeavor, nor that it was a good or useful thing to do in retrospect, but it sure thrilled me at the time. :)

    -Waldo Jaquith