Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Clearest Photos Ever Of Horsehead Nebula

Posted by Hemos on from the looking-deeply-into-the-continium dept.

angkor writes "A new composite image created from high-res photographs. Wow, just wow. You can see it at SpaceFlightNow."

9 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. If you look closely enough... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can almost make out the words:

    Be sure to drink your Ovaltine.

  2. European Southern Observatory by edgrale · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can be found here, http://www.eso.org You can find the link there to the images, or you can use this direct link: http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2002/phot -02-02.html Have fun!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:European Southern Observatory by dy_dx · · Score: 5, Informative

      close... it's actually at http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2002/phot -02-02.html (no space in the uri). it sure does make for a good background at those higher resolutions though...as do a large archive that page points to: an "Astronomy Picture of the Day"

  3. Re:very nice but... by at_18 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It must be enormous, but how enormous? Anyone?

    Using the Angular size calculator (beware: Excel xls file), given a distance of 1.700 light-years, and an apparent width of about 6 x 4 arc-minutes, we have that the nebula is roughly 3 x 2 light-years across.

    It doesn't sound much, but it's almost 30,000,000,000,000 kilometers tall, with a width of 20,000,000,000,000 kilometers. The 3rd dimension is not known, but probably on the same order of magnitude.

  4. Damn, still not good enough! by mr3038 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one trying to find Magrathea from those photos?

    --
    _________________________
    Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  5. alternate picture by talleyrand · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's am image what of the astronomers used to see.

    --

    "My fingers Emit sparks of fire in Expectation of my future labours." William Blake
  6. DPI? by mindstrm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has always bugged me.

    You can't refer to digital images via DPI. It just doens't translate. It's meaningless.
    You can't measure data with a ruler.

    So.. why do you say it's 72dpi?

  7. Clearest photos? I don't think so by Seenhere · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Hubble Space Telescope imaged it last year. They ran an internet poll to pick a target for the Hubble to observe, and the Horsehead won (Cowboy Neal was second, maybe). The Hubble Heritage Project published the result (it's a composite with some ground-based images filling in the edges) and it is better than the VLT picture, IMHO. You can see it here , along with lots of information about how it was made, and high-res versions.

    --Seen

    --
    "I used to be a dilettante. Then I thought I'd try something else for a while."
  8. Re:Clearest photos? I DO think so by mybecq · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, I think ESO's is a clear winner.
    Compare ESO's version (largest is 4.6MB JPEG @ 1951x2366)
    and
    any on Hubble's page (wide @ 800x813, closeup @ 1000x800).

    NOAO has better images than Hubble's too, but they're also wide angle (but still really nice)...
    Hubble's MPEG movie animation is very cool though.