Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Ximian to Change License for Mono

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the winds-of-change dept.

A Commentor writes: "According to news.com Ximian is changing the license to Mono from GPL to a variant of the XFree license. Apparently this is due to a partnership with Intel." Update: 01/28 15:03 GMT by T : There's a story at NewsForge as well, where RMS weighs in firsthand on the license choice.

4 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. Headline misleading? by MisterBlister · · Score: 5, Informative
    From my reading of the article, they changed the license of the classes, not the whole of Mono.


    This makes quite a bit of sense in terms of acceptance as if the root classes of the implementation are GPL that pretty much forces every application built to use Mono to be GPL. You can debate whether the classes would have been better off XFree-ish or LGPL, but they shouldn't be GPL (IMO), just as the gnu libc isn't GPL.

  2. License change. by miguel · · Score: 5, Informative
    The license change only applies to the Mono Class Libraries, and the precise license that we are using is the MIT X11 license.

    Miguel.

  3. Re: Intel is putting HUGE resources into Linux by Glasswire · · Score: 5, Informative

    -Intel officially supports 2 OSes, Win and Lin.
    -Intel writes the fastest C/C++ and Fortran compilers and parallelization tools for Linux
    -Intel is a founder of the Open Source Development Lab
    -Intel is working on dozens of Linux projects including OSCAR cluster, ethernet, gig E and embedded StrongARM work.
    -Itanium has over 500 applications for 3+ OSes while Hammer doesn't even have a finished OS yet.
    (Just don't tell Microsoft...)

  4. Re:DotGNU Portable.NET by miguel · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Mono runtime is released under the LGPL.
    The compiler is released under the GPL.
    The class libraries are released under the X11 license.

    The X11 license is a free software license (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#X11 License.
    It is also an Open Source license (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.ht ml

    All of it free software.

    If they were not `truly free software' we would have bigger problems (someone would have to start a reimplementation of X11, telnet, Kerberos, Expat, LibXML, Mesa GL, ftp, Tcl/Tk, BIND, DNS, and anything else released under the X11, the Ousterhout or the BSD licenses, because they are in essence the same thing).

    Miguel