Slashdot Mirror


FreeBSD Gets a New Security Officer

ve2asm writes "As sent to the freebsd-announce mailing list, Kris Kennaway is resigning as Security Officer. The core team has approved Jacques Vidrine as the new security officer.

3 of 15 comments (clear)

  1. Re:BlatantWhoring: A good "secure your BSD" link. by __past__ · · Score: 2, Interesting
    BTW, am I the only one who thinks that securelevels stink?

    IMHO it would be a better idea to be able to select the features securelevels imply individually. That way, one could still use the securelevel settings in /etc/rc.conf by just making /etc/rc setting a group of individual "securesettings".

    I mean, just because I happen to like rewriting my firewall rules doesn't mean I want anybody to be able to write to kmem, or to remove noschg!
  2. Re:BlatantWhoring: A good "secure your BSD" link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You want something like Linux's capability bits.

    Of course, to actually use them in a non-trivial way you pretty much HAVE to roll your own distro from scratch.

  3. Re:BlatantWhoring: A good "secure your BSD" link. by cperciva · · Score: 3, Interesting

    am I the only one who thinks that securelevels stink?

    Nope. Every time the topic came up in freebsd-security, Kris used to lead the "securelevels are broken, don't use them" charge.

    To be fair, they could be a useful security feature (although a more fine-grained control would of course be superior), but you'd have to do all sorts of stuff in order for that to happen. They are still quite useful as an anti-foot-shooting device, however.