FreeBSD Gets a New Security Officer
ve2asm writes "As sent to the freebsd-announce mailing list, Kris Kennaway is resigning as Security Officer. The core team has approved Jacques Vidrine as the new security officer.
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
IMHO it would be a better idea to be able to select the features securelevels imply individually. That way, one could still use the securelevel settings in /etc/rc.conf by just making /etc/rc setting a group of individual "securesettings".
I mean, just because I happen to like rewriting my firewall rules doesn't mean I want anybody to be able to write to kmem, or to remove noschg!Programming can be fun again. Film at 11.
You want something like Linux's capability bits.
Of course, to actually use them in a non-trivial way you pretty much HAVE to roll your own distro from scratch.
am I the only one who thinks that securelevels stink?
Nope. Every time the topic came up in freebsd-security, Kris used to lead the "securelevels are broken, don't use them" charge.
To be fair, they could be a useful security feature (although a more fine-grained control would of course be superior), but you'd have to do all sorts of stuff in order for that to happen. They are still quite useful as an anti-foot-shooting device, however.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid