FreeBSD Gets a New Security Officer
ve2asm writes "As sent to the freebsd-announce mailing list, Kris Kennaway is resigning as Security Officer. The core team has approved Jacques Vidrine as the new security officer.
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
IMHO it would be a better idea to be able to select the features securelevels imply individually. That way, one could still use the securelevel settings in /etc/rc.conf by just making /etc/rc setting a group of individual "securesettings".
I mean, just because I happen to like rewriting my firewall rules doesn't mean I want anybody to be able to write to kmem, or to remove noschg!Programming can be fun again. Film at 11.
am I the only one who thinks that securelevels stink?
Nope. Every time the topic came up in freebsd-security, Kris used to lead the "securelevels are broken, don't use them" charge.
To be fair, they could be a useful security feature (although a more fine-grained control would of course be superior), but you'd have to do all sorts of stuff in order for that to happen. They are still quite useful as an anti-foot-shooting device, however.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid