A Quick Peek at Longhorn

Kaypro writes: "The Register has an interesting article with some minor details regarding Microsoft's next OS. P2P, filesystem plugins and some thoughts from Hans Reiser, of ReiserFS fame make for an interesting read."

Comments

I submitted this story on Blackcomb in AUGUST:

[Artifice_Eternity]

For some reason, /. didn't consider a story on future MS operating systems important.

Read it yourself:

http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories/story/0,10 738,2802585,00.html

Re:This is an insult!

[CmdrSanity]

Incidentally, the code names are taken from a Canadian ski resort about 4-5 hours drive north of the MS campus. So if you ever go to Whistler mountain, look out for the blackcomb resort and longhorn saloon.

Version numbers...

[mech9t8]

Every version of Windows has a version number, and a build number (ie. Windows 2000 is NT Version 5.0 build 2195). Microsoft has just decided they're easier to market with all these other names. "Windows XP" is something new, "Windows 5.1" is just another minor upgrade.

Names like Longhorn are just internal codenames, just like, say, Debian Potato.

Windows 3.0
Windows 3.1
Windows 4.0 = Windows 95
Windows 4.1 = Windows 98
Windows 4.9 = Windows Me

Windows 98 SE was version 4.1 with a higher build number than Windows 98

Windows NT 3.1
Windows NT 3.5
Windows NT 4.0
Windows NT 5.0 = Windows 2000
Windows NT 5.1 = Windows XP

- There will probably be an XP Second Edition, which'll be version 5.1 with a higher build number
- Longhorn will probably be version 5.2. Who knows what'll actually be called - XP wasn't decided on till last spring.
- Blackcomb will probably be version 6.0

Re:Think Latin (was: Re:Scary future ahead)

[abde]

aaargh

read this:

http://www.perl.com/language/misc/virus.html

The. Last. Word.