Slashdot Mirror


Copy-Protected Digital VHS

DragonMagic writes: "BBC carries this story regarding the comeback, certain studios hope, of the video tape against the dominating sales of the DVD. Fox, Universal, Dreamworks SKG and Artisan Entertainment are releasing a series of blockbuster movies onto the format D-VHS, developed by JVC. DVHS offers High Definition TV technology and the possibility of copy prevention, and is able to play old VHS tapes as well."

7 of 444 comments (clear)

  1. I think most people already equate VHS with bad. by Spazntwich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It'll be difficult to convince people to go out and buy VHS tapes now that DVD has already been billed as the 'totally better' replacement for tapes, even if D-VHS is better.

    As for the media, how many people have bought a VHS player recently enough for it to have the "D-Theater" ability? People aren't going to go out and buy another VCR when they just shelled out 200$ or more on their DVD player.

  2. Some cool features by crow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DVHS promises 4 hours/tape of HDTV or 50 hours/tape of regular TV.

    For some people, the 50 hours/tape feature may be exciting. That's about 70 hours of TV if you cut out the commericals.

    Personally, I think this will go the way of DAT. Digital audio tape was a cool idea, and is still used in niche markets, but with recordable CDs isn't terribly interesting to consumers. With consumer-grade recordable DVD just around the corner, there's no real market here for a new tape format.

    1. Re:Some cool features by gwernol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For some people, the 50 hours/tape feature may be exciting. That's about 70 hours of TV if you cut out the commericals.

      As we know from the non-consumer electronics world (i.e. computers) tape is a great archive mechanism but is lousy for random access. The problem with putting 70 hours of TV onto a digital tape is that I rarely want to watch 70 hours of back-to-back TV shows. More likely I'll want to find that kicking episode of Buffy that's somewhere on the tape. I don't want to have to play through 35 hours of other things to find it.

      So although 70 hours of TV on a single tape sounds appealing, in practice I suspect that this format is going to lose out to recordable DVD technologies.

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
  3. Ask yourself this..... by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Studios should be asking themselves, "who are your early adopters?"

    DVD is too new for your average consumer to want to run out and buy a new player (even if it plays VHS too).

    High-end videophiles will know better. Random access media has too much going for it in terms of non-linear content (think "the making of" and trailers) and fast search forward or back. They also know that tape involves more moving parts, and thus more wear.

    So, they've got to be targeting the low-end videophiles who know just enough to be dangerous. Oddly enough, the vast majority of THAT market segment are college students or recent graduates, and would be the most likely to be turned off by the new copy-protection features!

    Oh yeah, this is going to be lucky to go as far as DIVX (the DVD format, not the video codec) did. ;-)

  4. Re:No Market by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that DVHS offers advantages only to people with HDTV. But right now that is a very small minority. DVD offered not only far superior picture quality to VHS, but also better sound and random access. DVHS loses that all important ability of random access and has for the regular viewer no advantage over DVD.

    Except for, presumably, being writable on a standard consumer-level system rather than requiring an MPEG-2 encoder and DVD burner?

    That will be where its value comes in -- as a way of consumers making their own recordings in digital format.

    Si

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  5. Is piracy really that much of a problem? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I buy a lot of DVDs. I mainly buy them because I think they're an excellent value. For the most part I pay just under $20 for new releases, sometimes less. In fact I've bought more DVDs than CDs. And with LD and VHS I was never really motivated to buy much. But lately the studios have been releasing some great special editions of various movies such as Holy Grail, Shrek, Star Trek The Motion Picture and so on with tons of extras for really good prices. I'm happy to spend my money on things like that.

    Even if I did find pirated movies, how much would I save? And what would the quality be like? In the case of some bootlegs, I've heard they're pretty poor. About the only reason I'd ever go for pirated DVDs is if its something I just can't get here legally. And if George would just release his movies on DVD, I'd never even have to think about it.

    Personally I think a lot of people are more like me than the handful of pirates the studios are so worried about. The studios are making a ton of money on DVD, probably with the addition of DVD they're now making more on home video sales than ever before. If they continue to provide quality products at reasonable prices, they got nothing to worry about. Besides, those determined to steal it will find a way, they always have before.

  6. Re:Not yet... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They only need to come up with a bulletproof enough CSS2+supermegaextra copy prevention system first.

    And then have it broken in 3 days by a kid half my age from a country with no electricity.