Posted by
michael
on from the we-don't-need-no-steenkin'-patches dept.
cybercyst writes: "You know the drill... Lets go hit those servers!" As usual, see kernel.org for the download or the changelog. Anyone using 2.5 for anything except testing?
Looks like it's devel kernel for sure
by
Turmio
·
· Score: 1, Offtopic
Damn, no ATA RAID for me, then:)
This one has been reported on the LKML some weeks ago but AFAIK now fix is made public yet...
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/ide'
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o ide-mod.o ide-taskfile.o ide.o ide-features.o ide-adma.o ide-dma.o ide-pci.o pdc202xx.o via82cxxx.o ide-proc.o
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o ide-probe-mod.o ide-probe.o ide-geometry.o
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c ataraid.c
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_ioctl':
ataraid.c:73: invalid operands to binary &
ataraid.c:72: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_open':
ataraid.c:83: invalid operands to binary &
ataraid.c:82: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_release':
ataraid.c:94: invalid operands to binary &
ataraid.c:93: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_make_request':
ataraid.c:105: structure has no member named `b_rdev'
ataraid.c:103: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_split_request':
ataraid.c:182: structure has no member named `b_rsector'
ataraid.c:193: warning: passing arg 1 of `generic_make_request' makes pointer from integer without a cast
ataraid.c:193: too many arguments to function `generic_make_request'
ataraid.c:194: warning: passing arg 1 of `generic_make_request' makes pointer from integer without a cast
ataraid.c:194: too many arguments to function `generic_make_request'
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_register_disk':
ataraid.c:233: incompatible type for argument 2 of `register_disk'
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_init':
ataraid.c:249: `hardsect_size' undeclared (first use in this function)
ataraid.c:249: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ataraid.c:249: for each function it appears in.)
ataraid.c:280: warning: passing arg 2 of `blk_queue_make_request' from incompatible pointer type
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_exit':
ataraid.c:289: `hardsect_size' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[3]: *** [ataraid.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/ide'
make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/ide'
make[1]: *** [_subdir_ide] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2
moderators shmoderators
by
Penrod+Pooch
·
· Score: 0, Offtopic
Shouldn't moderators actually click the link before they give an informative mod?
Re:Use The Mirrors, Luke!
by
biglig2
·
· Score: 1, Offtopic
Is that moded redundant because people start screaming about this every time slashdot posts a new kernel release? I'm not sure you're meant to do that, else everytime a story gets posted twice we'd have to mode every comment redundant;-)
-- ~~~~~
BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
You kinda forgot...
by
roie_m
·
· Score: 0, Offtopic
First post (-1, Off-topic)
Re:Usability.
by
saintlupus
·
· Score: 1, Offtopic
Oh, and to the gibbering fucksticks with the mod points - it's generally considered "Flamebait" when I call into question the ideals of the Great Slashdot Hivemind, not a "Troll." Thanks.
"Lets hit those servers"???
You've got to be kidding?
An early release of a development kernel?
As if....
Damn, no ATA RAID for me, then :)
This one has been reported on the LKML some weeks ago but AFAIK now fix is made public yet...
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/ide'
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o ide-mod.o ide-taskfile.o ide.o ide-features.o ide-adma.o ide-dma.o ide-pci.o pdc202xx.o via82cxxx.o ide-proc.o
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o ide-probe-mod.o ide-probe.o ide-geometry.o
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c ataraid.c
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_ioctl':
ataraid.c:73: invalid operands to binary &
ataraid.c:72: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_open':
ataraid.c:83: invalid operands to binary &
ataraid.c:82: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_release':
ataraid.c:94: invalid operands to binary &
ataraid.c:93: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_make_request':
ataraid.c:105: structure has no member named `b_rdev'
ataraid.c:103: warning: `minor' might be used uninitialized in this function
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_split_request':
ataraid.c:182: structure has no member named `b_rsector'
ataraid.c:193: warning: passing arg 1 of `generic_make_request' makes pointer from integer without a cast
ataraid.c:193: too many arguments to function `generic_make_request'
ataraid.c:194: warning: passing arg 1 of `generic_make_request' makes pointer from integer without a cast
ataraid.c:194: too many arguments to function `generic_make_request'
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_register_disk':
ataraid.c:233: incompatible type for argument 2 of `register_disk'
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_init':
ataraid.c:249: `hardsect_size' undeclared (first use in this function)
ataraid.c:249: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ataraid.c:249: for each function it appears in.)
ataraid.c:280: warning: passing arg 2 of `blk_queue_make_request' from incompatible pointer type
ataraid.c: In function `ataraid_exit':
ataraid.c:289: `hardsect_size' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[3]: *** [ataraid.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/ide'
make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/ide'
make[1]: *** [_subdir_ide] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers'
make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2
Shouldn't moderators actually click the link before they give an informative mod?
Is that moded redundant because people start screaming about this every time slashdot posts a new kernel release? I'm not sure you're meant to do that, else everytime a story gets posted twice we'd have to mode every comment redundant ;-)
~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
Oh, and to the gibbering fucksticks with the mod points - it's generally considered "Flamebait" when I call into question the ideals of the Great Slashdot Hivemind, not a "Troll." Thanks.
--saint