Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Java Native Compilation Examined

Posted by michael on from the just-in-time dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes: "DeveloperWorks has an interesting article about compiling Java apps to run as native appplications on the target machine without the need for a JVM."

3 of 455 comments (clear)

  1. New name... by SlashChick · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...compiling Java apps to run as native appplications on the target machine without the need for a JVM."

    In other news, they have also decided on a name for this wonderful new technology: C.

    --
    Simpli - Your source for San Jose dedicated servers and colocation!
  2. Java- Write once, run away by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know, I would be a lot more impressed with Jawa bytecode. The label "utinni" would stand for any register- let the computer worry about it. If it was English it would be like saying "move 0x203 over there".

    graspee

  3. Re:It's about time! by LoseNotLooseGuy · · Score: 1, Funny

    You loose reflection support and similar low level access to the runtime environment.

    I do not think you would "let loose or release" reflection support and similar low level access; it is more likely that you would fail to retain this functionality. The word you were looking for is lose.

    Congratulations! You have been participant #14 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error. (I nearly permitted you to escape due to your .de address, but upon reflection I realized that my message must reach the masses.)

    --
    Proudly correcting Slashdot's most irritating linguistic error since 2002.