Slashdot Mirror


Constructing a Home Recording Studio on a Small Budget?

Pinball Wizard asks: "I would like to put together a home music studio. When it comes to keyboards, effects, and other electronic goodies, the choices seem pretty straightforward. But when it comes to guitar and recording other analog instruments and voices, the world of home recording seems bewildering. What are the best ways of recording analog sounds onto hard disk? I'm a lot more interested in a clever technical solution that costs less than $1,000 than I am taking out a loan and buying ProTools for $10,000 or more. What are the different pieces of equipment (microphones, preamps, etc) that are needed to do this well?"

24 of 49 comments (clear)

  1. Low budget home recording studio by Metrollica · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a book on Amazon here that might be what you're looking for.

    Book Description
    Practical guidance in the design, construction, and operation of your own affordable acoustics studio. Every aspect of designing and building an audio studio is fully discussed: floor plans, control rooms, wall and ceiling treatments, reverberation time, air conditioning, noise considerations, and more! The authors carefully describe procedures, necessary equipment, likely cost, and possible design parameters. Emphasis is placed on low cost studios designed with your specific needs in mind. From studio plans, sound lock and acoustical treatment, to studio proportions and noise factors, this revised edition provides everything needed to:Set up a listening room, a recording studio, and a control room.Achieve good sound in a listening room, a recording studio, and a control room.Control background noise in these rooms.Make acoustical measurements. Learn how the new type RPG diffusors work. Use the new Tube Traps and more.

    If you don't want to buy a book, look at this site that explains how to use a PC in a homestudio.

    Another few sites are here here and here.

    Hope that helps.

    --



    --Metrollica
  2. Equipment Providers by phpAbUser · · Score: 3, Informative
    I work as the technical director for an internet radio station (Brentwood Radio.com), and we have been doing the Digital->Analog/Analog->Digital thing for some time.
    The equipment I suggest you acquire varies on what sorts of sounds you want to record.
    • Obviously you'll need a good sound card, Creative's Sound Blaster Live! is comparitvely cheap for the value you get.
    • You'll need good microphones, also (it's amazing the difference quality makes). Nice mikes will let you record any instrument, electric or not. I would suggest the company Shure.
    • Next on your list would be a mixer, I would highly suggest Mackie boards, and for slightly cheaper tastes the Behringer line.
    • Another key component is good cabling. It's tempting to just run over to Radio Shack and buy what you need... but I've found those cables to have crappy shielding, almost no jacket, and die after about 2 years. I would suggest Hosa cables, or, if you have extra cash, Monster cables.
    • Lastly you might think of getting a headphone matrix. This is mainly useful if you want to record a band/mutiple people at once. It allows you to amplify the sound a person is making back to them.Also it will allow you to have 6+ headphones w/o splitting the signal.
    Well, that's all I have to offer.

    -Mark
    P.S. Actually one more note, don't jerry rig things unless you really need to.
    --
    PHP, it kicks ASP!
    1. Re:Equipment Providers by ktakki · · Score: 3, Informative
      All in all, this is pretty good advice.

      But...

      I would suggest Hosa [hosatech.com] cables, or, if you have extra cash, Monster [monstercable.com] cables.


      I think you bracketed the solution here. I've found Hosa cables, particularly their snakes, cheap, noisy, and prone to failure. Conversely, the Monster stuff is expensive and overkill. I'm not sure their buzzword-laden technology even works as they claim.

      My advice would be to seek a middle ground: buy Belden cable and good connectors (Neutrik or Switchcraft) in bulk and get a good soldering iron. Knowing how to solder is pretty a useful skill for a recording engineer. You'll also save money, for a small tradeoff of time and effort. Plus, when your bassist trips over his cable and rips the jack out of his instrument, you'll get to be a hero.

      So far as snakes go, Whirlwind makes pretty good gear. I've built my own snakes and they're a pain in the ass to do. If your setup is small enough, you can even get by without one. Just keep your runs short and don't bundle the cables too tight.

      k.
      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  3. Re:It would be helpful by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
    Well, my subject line was changed a bit, so it looks like I need broad information on constructing a studio, but really, all I asked for was some pointers on recording analog sounds like guitar, drums, and vocals onto hard disk.

    I've found cards with 24bit/96kHz specs for under $200 yet other cards with the same specs(maybe more I/O options) that sell for $800 or more. So I'm really trying to find people who have the experience to know what to buy and what not to buy from the point of getting the most bang for the buck.

    So basically, my question is: how do I record analog sounds to my PC with the highest quality possible at a reasonable price?

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  4. go to www.homerecording.com and try again by ruebarb · · Score: 3, Informative

    www.homerecording.com has an entire discussion forum related to computer mixing/mastering...including computers and the soundcards.

    --

    ----------
    ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
    1. Re:go to www.homerecording.com and try again by ameoba · · Score: 2

      www.sonicstate.com has some good stuff as well. There are a -lot- of places more well suited to finding out about this. As far as comming out with something usable for $1000, good luck. Music gear is sickly overpriced and depreciates slowly, so buying used doesn't even help -that- much.

      While going with the 'leet Protools setup might be overboard (even though they have a basic 8-track version available for free) there are some things that you really can't skimp on. A solid multi-IO soundcard and a -good- MIDI interface are key components. So are good microphones and monitor speakers (trust me. Even the nicest PC speakers just don't compare to a cheap set of reference speakers for mixing). Just those components alone will set you back a grand, and that's before buying the computro.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  5. Re:It would be helpful by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Informative
    Avoid game cards. There's a recent Sound Blaster (Audigy?) that freaking _resamples_ all audio that passes through it to 48K and back again- insanity! When I was researching a new sound card purchase what I was hearing was: MAudio Delta (cheapest- Audiophile 2496, which I ended up getting- has Linux drivers, apparently!), Echo Layla, Echo Gina etc. If you want to get hardcore, RME Hammerfall. How many inputs do you need, what kind of breakout box, etc?

    Come up with some prospective names and do a google _news_ search to see what people are saying about such cards in, say, rec.audio.pro. DON'T go by what you can find on the Web or on 'reviews'...

  6. Re:It would be helpful by clifyt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dude, few of the Under $200 cards are REALLY going to give you 24 bit. They MAY record at 96k, but the noise floor of these things will effective lower the bit level to something much less.

    Then again, I generally go with the Echo or MAudio cards, some of which WILL fit the under $200 budget.

    I've seen suggestions of SoundBlasters...the minute you hear ANYONE suggest a SB for ProAudio on ANY budget, you can discount their advice on anything else. Still the one guy makes mention of the Mackie vs. Behringer...for my money, Behringer makes a damn good board. Its all Chinese manufacturing and done very inexpensively, BUT it isn't cheap. I played with their new board at NAMM a few weeks back and I'm kinda regressing my higher end Tascam board.

    As another guy mentioned and is entirely on -- Hosa IS crap for most work (unless you are a plug and forget person that doesn't move equipment) and Monster sucks big time...for christ sakes, they sell ETHERNET Monster cables and try to tell us that the gold plating and unoxidized cable makes digital audio downloaded over the internet sound better. I don't care HOW cheap Monster is, I will never buy their products after that crap.

    Anywho, this is NOT something that should be asked on Slashdot. Geeks like to look at specs and buy according to those (yeah, I double duty as a geek in both the Music Industry AND in a day job that is slowly becoming more of a hobby as my music stuff paid more last year than my university research). Look on Usenet or one of the most excellent websites out their like ProRec or even a site like my own -- http://sonikmatter.com. My site ISN'T geared towards a lot of the things you are looking into, but if ya decide to use Proaudio software such as Logic Audio, it WILL be the place to learn about these as well as building a DAW (Digital Audio Workstation).

    Find a forum (NOT /.) and ask the same question there.

    As a side note, I am actually taking a break from working on my latest DAW. Its a midrange audio box...just threw a 1.8Ghz and a decent server Motherboard into a box with 512M of memory (will expand to 1.5G as soon as I get other things tweaked). Matrox dual 450 card - great for audio work as its stable and doesn't screw with the PCI bus as most gaming cards will. Echo Darla...this isn't going to be recording more than a stereo pair in, BUT will need to use all 8 outputs occasionally. UW SCSI is a must on this box, I need at LEAST 64 tracks internal before grouped to 8. Gigasampler, Reaktor and Logic Audio Platinum 5 will be installed on this in the next week (as soon as 5 gets here). So far, it has cost me about $800 and most of this box is new (except for the software which was sent to me for beta testing and reviews and the older SCSI stuff that I've pulled out of servers as I upgrade them). Add about $800 for the high end audio software (and there ARE a lot that are lower range and will do what ya need).

    You CAN do this on a budget, but ya have to plan everything out and watch Pricewatch / Pricegrabber like a hawk and make sure you get EXACTLY what you planned on, not just what ever might work...audio is picky about what ya put in your machine...especially if you are appreciative of stability. Windows CAN be stable...hardware is mostly the same, its drivers by irreputable companies that keep it from being stable.

    Thats enough of my sharing...read what ya can and get an idea from that. Check out the websites and check on Usenet.

    clif - sonikmatter.com

  7. Um, dude... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    My Neumanns alone cost $1400. What do you plan to record on a $1000 budget? Do you want it to sound good? Are you going to attempt multitracking without something like Peak, Paris, or Protools? Please think about what you're trying to do and realize that, sometimes, you *really do* need to spend money on things.

    There is no Linux pro audio solution. There is no Open Source microphone preamplifier. You can not do more with less in some hobbies. A SM57 is cheap and it sounds it; there's no magic way to change it.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Um, dude... by Garak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your Neumanns are over priced.

      There are lots of mics for under $300 right now that sound just as good as any Neumanns.

      The Studio Projects C1 I have sounds alot like the u87. Many people who have reviewed it like it more and are shocked when they find out its only $229.

      The m-audio Audiobuddy is the best preamp under $1000 in alot of peoples books and it only cost $79.

      The SM-57 is an ok mic. Most of its fame comes from how much abuse it can take and still sound the same.

      There are a few mics that are around the price of a SM-57 that sound really good. The marshall electronics MXL603 is one of them. Its a Small condensor mic.

      N-track studio is starting to mature and its under $100, Cool edit pro has been around for a while and I use it in the studio all the time, its around $200 I think. You can certianly multitrack with that software.

      The M-audio Audiophile 24/96 soundcards are only $150. Thats 24bit 96khz and they sound way better than the Soundblaster soundcards. Their Delta soundcards are a little more pro with balanced +4 inputs.

      Pro studio quality gear is now becoming within reach of the hobbest.

      --
      God, root, what is the difference?
    2. Re:Um, dude... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

      KM140s actually; imported (grey market) from musiciansgear.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    3. Re:Um, dude... by gordguide · · Score: 2

      "... Your Neumanns are over priced. There are lots of mics for under $300 right now that sound just as good as any Neumanns. ..."

      Well, they might be overpriced but I know a few people who would pay twice as much for them, if that's what it took.

      I have heard a lot of very good albums made without the benifit of a studio ribbon, but I have also heard CDs essentially remade after a group signs a contract. Compare the (very good) Indy release with Sony Music's release, and you can hear the Neumanns do their magic, believe me.

      I have always used mikes from Sennheiser, AKG and Beyer Dynamic as well as a few others.

      I agree that the Marshall is a good compromise (and of course every mic is a compromise). In my opinion, the Shure SM-57/58's are pure road gear, though.

    4. Re:Um, dude... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

      Yes, I did. Basically, all that needs to be done is a little rewrite of part of the linux SCSI tape driver code to enable it to recognize audio DATs. The DATlib software comes with 2.0 linux patches, but I was running 2.2 at the time. I ended up porting the patches for 2.0 to 2.2. Basically, for 2.2, they rewrote the entire st driver and changed a lot of the function/syscall names, and so the port/patching mostly involved renaming stuff in the original patch (a lot of source code comparison.) In the end, it worked fine.

      The DATlib software itself now seems to be maintained by Wayne Hoxsie; he has modified it to work (better, I imagine) with Linux. You can get it here.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  8. My setup and where it's going... by cmowire · · Score: 3, Informative

    So my last album was recorded in 16 bit/44kHz off of a Soundblaster AWE64 Gold. Not the greatest audio performance, but better than the 48kHz resampled SB Live.

    You should have one or two pieces of analog gear. You probably want to have a mixer, especially if you want to record drums. Mackies are a safe bet and are not much more than the generic stuff. I used to be able to borrow a Mackie, but that's on my list of things to buy.

    It's also extremely convenient to have an external compressor or two. I have two compressors and that's more than enough, but I don't do drums.

    You want to make sure that your inputs (i.e. the sound card and mic) and the outputs (i.e. the speakers) are of good quality. So make sure you get a good set of studio monitor speakers, a good pair of headphones, and a good sound card. That's been covered already by other people. A new Echo card that does 24/96kHz is also on my list of toys to buy.

    Guitar/Bass Multi FX processors are your friend. At least, if you do my kind of music. Last time, I borrowed a digitech processor. Now I own one. The speaker simulators are much less trouble than a real amp.

    You probably want to go to a music store and pick out a microphone in person. But you want at least one good vocal mic. If you have an instrument other than a guitar/bass, i.e. a piano or a violin or something, pick up a good instrument mic, too. Shure SM57s are a good bet for instrument mics, but you can probably do better if you look.

    You don't need an outboard FX processor, except for guitar/bass FX units. Most good multitracking programs have most of the FX you need built in.

    Now, as far as saving money, you are going to end up spending at least $500 on a good set of monitor speakers, either self-powered or speakers and a power amp. Your audio card is at least $400. Your mixer is $400. Your guitar processor is $200-400. Your mics are going to be $200-400. All in all, it'll probably be closer to $2000.

    Which is a little much. Most people accumulate things over time. So you don't bother with a mixer right off, just plug a SM57 into your input port. Maybe you already own a guitar processor. Skip out on good monitors and switch between computer speakers and your headphones for the time being. You get the picture.

  9. Minidisc by Nater · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A friend of mine does a lot of home recording. He records using a stereo microphone plugged into a minidisc player/recorder. Later, he plays the disc back into his computer and captures it to wav format, which he then mucks with using various tools (audigy comes to mind), and finally convert it to ogg and mp3. You can listen to some of it here. His stuff doesn't go through much production after it's recorded so a lot of it is very raw sounding, but if I read your question correctly, you've already got that part figured out and you're just looking for a way to get the sound waves into the computer. This works pretty well.

    --

    I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
    "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

  10. Kit list for $1000... by Manic+Miner · · Score: 3, Informative

    My brother is the real expert (eg. actually qualified in these things) but here's my best shot:

    • Sound card with audio in, soundblasters are ok - if you get a good one I know about 10 people with an SB live, some are great, some are noisy as hell. If you get a noisy one I suggest you take it back and get a swap - $40
    • Small mixer, something like a Sprit notepad is just fine for small applications, it has a few mic channels and a stereo in.. Ideal for small time recording - $200
    • A good general purpose microphone, I agree with a shure, probably a SM58 is a good starting point - $90
    • A mic cable, most of these will be pretty standard - $12
    • A mic stand, essential - $30
    • Audio samplign software, cool edit pro is very good, and you can try it shareware first - $400
    • Misc connection cables - $50

    Total: $822

    This should give you a good start.. however you will also need some decent speakers - monitor speakers not just your hi-fi ones - and an appropriate amp for them. You could start with your hi-fi stuff but you need to something better pretty soon. I don't know if you were looking for something more than this for $1000 but this would be a good starting point. All I can say is that this is an expensive game, but very fun ;)

    --
    If you ever drop your keys into a river of molten lava, let'em go, because, man, they're gone.
  11. Great Timing by ScumBiker · · Score: 2

    This article couldn't have come at a better time, since we're buying a new house with enough room for me to dedicate to a home studio. W00T! I've decided to buy a 12-track Behringer mixer at first and dump that to the HD of a Win98 or Win2k box. SM57's for my amps. Soundforge and Acid for mixing, Cakewalk for writing midi sequences and drums, although I'll probably use a ton of Acid loops for drums and other rythyms at first. Later, I'm going to get the Digi 001 w/ ProTools le and probably a Mac tower. Not sure about the Mac though.

    My preference would be to do all this stuff in Linux. No, I haven't looked around much yet, I'd like to get some wisdom from here. I know I will burn my cd's from an existing Redhat box with my burner on it.

    I spoke of drums earlier. I'm a guitarist not a drummer (hence the house... :)). I really don't know shit about drum patterns and how to creatively write them. Some good resources for that would be way cool.

    --
    --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  12. Punt Soundblaster by wfrp01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Creative makes boards for games. Not for serious audio.

    I happen to prefer M-Audio, because of their broad platform support: http://www.midiman.com/products/digital.php.

    Their low-end card (Audiophile 2496) is cost-competitive with Creative's high end, and would probably do you very nicely.

    You'll see most pro gear moving the D/A stuff external to the computer, to reduce noise.

    --

    --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
  13. Used by bluGill · · Score: 2

    Look for a recording studio that is going out of buisness and attend their auction. Sometimes you can get deals, soemtimes not. (Don't pay too much)

    Most cities have some hole in the wall used recording equipment place. Find them.

    Don't be afraid to go analog. Avoid making extra generation copies, and you will be fine. Those old reel-reel tapes are good, better than CDs until you get too many generations out of them. (with good tape, and otherwise good habits to keep it good) In fact my understanding is a lot of professionals have given up on digital for mixing, and they often will use analog recording. The big advantage of analog as it has been a known quality for years, you can find perfectly good equipemnt for the 1960s that will work, though modern stuff might be better quality.

    1. Re:Used by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A word of caution-- reel-to-reel tapes are actually quite a lot worse than the best CDs. Signal/noise for current Ampex studio master multitrack analog tape is 64.8 dB. Digital recording with a good A/D converter, if it's true 16-bit (not just byte size, but actual resolution), would give you 96 dB. And people can generally perceive a difference of as little as 3 dB in signal/noise (I know because I've tested this). There are other noise and distortion sources in the signal chain, both on record and on playback, so your actual figures will be worse than that (which is one of the reasons that some CDs sound so crappy compared to old studio tape). The other reason is that recording engineers in those days knew how to mix and master so that the noise and distortion were less noticeable.

      The other thing with tapes is to beware of media cost. Multitrack reel-to-reel is very costly compared to CDR or even DAT tape.

      One way to save money on digital is to consider the added value of 24-bit versus 16-bit technologies. Theoretical max signal-noise for 16-bit is about 96 dB. The very best 24-bit analog/digital converters give about 103 dB s/n (ignore the phony "A-weighted" number), and 95 dB THD+N (a more perceptually relevant noise figure that includes total harmonic distortion). That is, really not much better than 16 bits: 103 dB is under 18 bits. The only big gain in having 24 bits versus 16 is that you get some guard digits that are helpful when doing long, iterative calulations, such as the ones that happen in digital reverbs or some kinds of SFX; also handy when doing lots of sub-mixes. But 16-bit digital technology is far less costly and not much worse in terms of actual sound quality. And some mixing and FX software tacks on the guard digits anyway.

      --
      Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
  14. Some basics... by gordguide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Repeat after me:
    Pro is pro, and consumer is consumer.

    Ignore specs, numbers, "just as good as...", "same as [insert expensive gear] but costs only..."

    Pro gear always exceeds it's specs, under all or nearly all conditions. It probably has good, stable power supplies that typically cost more to make than the "just as good as.. " product does all together. Build quality and component selection is done to impress a knowledgable and discerning crowd, not to look like a good deal at Best Buy.

    It is usually rugged where it needs to be; but it could be quite fragile if that makes better sound, because it is assumed Pro users know how to treat it.

    Some pro gear is made to go into a rack and sit there for it's lifetime, and some gear is made so drunks can load it into a too-small van at 4 AM and it still works the next night 300 miles away. (No attempt to portray roadies/musicians as drunks; I'm sure sober furniture movers and any respectable airline could also serve to test ruggedness). Good road gear and good studio gear are usually not the same, so don't assume you want what a live band uses. Some very famous microphones are popular because Punk Rockers can't break them even though they don't sound all that great, and some sound fantastic but will spontaneosly explode if you look at them funny. But, you need good microphones, and it's an unwritten law that you can't have too many.

    There is nothing wrong with Analog; but Digital is the way of the future. Because of this, you may fit your budget and get better sound by picking up used Analog gear.

    You will hear a lot if opinions about what to use and whether Analog is junk or Digital is 'da bomb but for the most part Digital is done poorly (it's consumer gear) and the good stuff is very pricy. Get the good stuff if you can afford it (about $500 or so for your sound card, and you're just beginning).

    Don't pay too much attention to S/N for your recording media (assuming you are using good stuff, not a cassette deck) because anything better than 60+ db (without noise reduction) is fine, provided you don't play with it much (overdubs, bouncing tracks, etc).

    16-bit digital boasts 30+ db better, but the reality is everybody will be playing your music back with gear that doesn't give you more than about 40 db of dyamic range and typically a LOT less, sometimes less than 3db. Very good playback systems sound excellent with material that has a -60 db noise floor, and 90% of your music will be played back on boombox level gear, at best.

    Don't buy NEW digital gear that doesn't support 24-bit/96Khz at a minimum. If you can go 24/96+, then you're on your way to overcome the majority of problems Digital had over Analog so there's no need to worry about which format to use. 16-bit Digital wins some, loses some when it comes to sound quality over Pro Analog.

    Get some good speakers and some cheap speakers, and mix/master/produce so it sounds good on both. Use Pro speakers or one of the few consumer models pro's use.

    I strongly recommend finding/talking to/hanging out with people who have already done this and do it seriously. They made a lot of mistakes and so will you, but you will make far fewer than if you try to do this on your own.

    If you're broke, Stereo is the only way to go. You can't afford 5 of everything.

  15. Re:It would be helpful by gordguide · · Score: 2

    All you really need is:
    Good Software. Spark ME is free, and will get you going but you will come up against it's limits pretty quickly (does 24/96 though). Expect to spend a few bucks on your digital SW. For budget software needs, go here:
    http://www.hitsquad.com/smm/

    A good (don't even think soundblaster) sound card. I like products from RME but others have mentioned pro-level alternaltives at lower prices.

    Good microphones; you can start with just one but you will be buying more as time goes on. A good mic stand can be had fairly cheap, used.

    Good cables. The poster who mentioned a Belden catalog and a soldering iron is on the right track. You really don't need to buy cable premade and these skills will save you money for the rest of your life.

    You might be able to meet your budget if you're careful.

  16. MOTU by kfs27 · · Score: 2, Informative

    if yer using a mac or pc for hardware i would go with MOTU...they have a few firewire audio interfaces that have 8 or 12 tracks of digital audio over one firewire cable!

    midiman makes the quattro which is USB 4 tracks in and out for 350 dollars

    software wise....cakewalk makes the best stuff for a pc probably....

    mac i'd use digital performer....

    pro tools is awesome, but expensive. keep in mind that digidesign just put out some brandy dandy new system so prices may be dropping on the older stuff.

    have fun and good luck

    --
    Kenny Sabarese
    www.kennysabarese.com
  17. My current setup.. by sid_vicious · · Score: 2

    I'm just running a SoundBlaster on a dedicated PC. I've got my old Digitech RP-1 preamp/multieffects running into a Behringer mixer (four mono and four stereo channels) which cost me about $200. If I ever get around to it, I intend to add a Line6 Bass POD to do my bass effects, and a Roland V-Club electric drum kit.

    Oh, and of course, I've GOT to have a Gibson Les Paul Custom to replace my old Ibanez 350EX.

    I've also got an old Peavey microphone that does a pretty decent job with vocals (maybe $80) - but since I don't sing, that hasn't been a problem.
    I'm running Cool Edit Pro on the PC. Great for multitrack recording, but don't rely on it for effects.

    All in all, it's a pretty decent setup for the almost-nothing it cost me to put together. It's certainly not a professional solution, but it's probably more along the lines of what you're looking for.

    --
    If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.