Tom's Hardware Reviews the Xbox
steddyj writes: "Tom's Hardware released this article which looks deep into the Xbox, its peripherals, and just about everything from every angle, and compares it to the PS. Incredibly detailed article."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
I wonder how long it will take for someone to port xbill (which would be more popular than Quake according to the xbill homepage) to the XBox... there is a port for Win32 available, so it shouldn't be too impossible.
It's been out for ages. Why no version of Linux for the box yet? I remember lots of little penguin people claiming it wouldn't take long to crack the box and get their favorite kernel running on it. So where is it? Or are Microsoft actually smarter than the smelly unwashed masses?
For another, Microsoft must approve every piece of software that runs on a home XBox so that the company can make up the money it spent marketing the console.
That's not the problem. Swap penguins and Billies, have Microsoft gratefully approve it (I bet they won't even demand any money for it) and include a hack for the icons to switch back after a fixed date.
The only problem
with Tom's hardware is
the ammount of information
that they display
per page, in order
to get as many
advertisment
views as possible
.
sig?
That's right. The Liberty Alliance is going to be much better. It's not controlled by money-grubbing evil companies. Oh wait. It is.
"artical"? "compeditors"?
Your competition is obviously the Webster's Dictionary.
It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
"I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
I don't think Microsoft studied the history of the gaming systems market. Anybody remember some of the failed systems. I beleive there was the NeoGeo. The wasn't a whole lot of games out for the system. THe graphic rocked for the time, but the just wasn't that many games. (Of course, I am also ignoring the high cost of the system.) Sega also had a few failed systems becuase they just didn't have the games.
The PS II has been estimated to have 400+ games including PS I & PS II games. I know the XBox doesn't have that much games out. There are more likely to be games I like when there is a lot of them. I know I am thinking about getting a PS II. I won't consider an XBox. It just isn't worth playing the waiting game for games!
At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
Yesterday I zapped through the German TV-Channels and then I just decided to watch NBC Giga. They wanted to show a game, tried to load it 3 times and only a black screen was there. Of cource it wasn't blue :-)
Another game needed 4 Minutes to load!! But when the intro was successfully loaded it was time for commercials.
Just have fun with that xbox *lol*
So how stupid do I have to be to tell the people that the xbox is a must?