Slashdot Mirror


Inexpensive Network Servers?

Linuxthess asks: "I work in a small company with only 20 or so employees. Being the most tech-savvy of them I find myself doing less work as a salesman, and more as their non-paid tech support. I was asked for a solution to create a domain for login authentication, a DHCP server, a webserver, file & printer services, and e-mail. I found three such companies with an inexpensive, yet solid products aimed at what we need: one is Celestix with their Aries and Taurus products; there is a company in Chicago called Dartek which sell a custom-built box called iMass which comes in three flavors; and lastly a company in Canada named Net Integration Technologies Inc who has a box named Net Integrator that is available in various flavors. Does anyone have experience in regard to these solutions? I think we will go along with the Taurus, but I want to hear a little more regarding the quality of doing this job inexpensively (these things start from $800 and go until $3000). I spoke with a tech-support guy, and he told me customers buy a couple of these since they're so cheap for redundancy, and clustering."

45 comments

  1. Get a used one. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Save you 1/2 the money, and you generally know if the models gonna be a lemon or not. Youre not gonna need the top of the line server for office stuff anyway, just something reliable.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  2. Start them off right.... by tfurrows · · Score: 1

    Since you apparently have the opportunity, why not get them started right. When choosing your software solutions, make sure you go with open standards, not proprietary ones. Also, follow the FP's advice and get used HW if you can... or at least not the top-of-the-line. Perhaps it's just my freedom-fighting hippiness, but I'd take an opportunity like this and run with it (as I have here, implimenting 4 Linux servers in our NW/NT environment).

    1. Re:Start them off right.... by nadie · · Score: 1

      That is what the writer is doing. All of the machines being looked at already come loaded and configured with Linux. $800 for a supported Linux machine isn't a bad deal.

  3. simplicity? by AlienSquid · · Score: 2

    you pretty much just described every flavor of linux and *bsd running samba, sendmail and a dhcp server.

    just grab an old workstation, install Slackware(or whatever flavor you like) and you're golden.

    plus as time goes on, you can upgrade to your heart's content with off the shelf components.

  4. Samba... by Slipped_Disk · · Score: 1

    If your company isn't dead set on having a commercial solution, a commodity PC ($500 or less) with samba, dhcpd and a pop/imap daemon would more than suffice for your needs. Windows 2000 domain support isn't all it could be, but if all you need to do is set up file/print sharing and login authentication for the domain that will work.

    This has the advantage of costing only whatever you spend on the PC and your time setting it up (Linux/BSD & the associated programs listed above are all freely available), but unfortunately you would be on your own to admin and support it. In the end I think that it would balance out in the company's favor though, as well as providing relatively easy upgrade paths for the future.

    --
    /~mikeg
  5. Before anyone opens their damned mouth by AnalogBoy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Stay away from Linux if you want to be taken seriously by investors. Stay away from samba - Get a windows (NT4 on the cheap) solution for your domain needs. A *nix box will suffice for most everything else.
    I suggest one of the Free BSD's.. Make sure you take in the political and long term financial ramifications of any decision you make.

    $0.02, not flamebait, nor troll.

    1. Re:Before anyone opens their damned mouth by Slipped_Disk · · Score: 1

      If you're going to go with an NT solution, it would make sense to buy a $5-800 mid-range PC system and slap on a copy of W2K server (dont recall the price offhand).

      This would be capable of acting as your mail/dhcp/domain auth server in the same way as a *NIX box like the ones described by myself and others above, and would save the cost (money, equipment and time) of admining two machines.

      Before anyone starts flaming or modding me down for mentioning the W-Word, a properly secured W2K or NT box (disable all unneded services, ditch IIS) is secure enough for most environments as long as the admin keeps up with service packs and security fixes. There's a windows update link on the start menu - USE IT.

      --
      /~mikeg
    2. Re:Before anyone opens their damned mouth by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't the most sense be to theme a KDE/Gnome install to look just like Win2k/WinXP/WinNT, and run Linux/*BSD under it?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Before anyone opens their damned mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not a troll, not flamebait, just incredibly stupid.

      A BSD box would work fine. So would a Windows box (though I would go with 2000 since it is orders of magnitude more reliable than 4.0). So would a Linux box.

      As for investors, its obvious you've never dealt with any. They care about what OS is running on your file/email/DHCP server about as much as they care what brand of vacuum cleaner you use.

      This guy is looking for his options in purchasing a tool to get a job done, not a religion. While its nice that your particular religion happens to be BSD, that isn't really relevant.

      Some advice to you for next time you "open your damned mouth": expect to be taken much more seriously if you lose the irrational religious zeal. It doesn't work for the Dirty Gnu Hippies and it doesn't work for you.

    4. Re:Before anyone opens their damned mouth by aminorex · · Score: 1

      The problem with that theory is that the service
      packs break your software. For example,
      Win2k's SP2 broke Microsoft Exchange. It
      doesn't do you much good to have a "secure"
      (in the very limited sense of 'no exploits known
      to microsoft which they have been both willing
      to admit to and able to release a fix for) "secure"
      server, if it doesn't SERVE!

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    5. Re:Before anyone opens their damned mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking about saving money, the first thing to get rid of is Exchange - both because it's a seperate box (usually with SCSI and RAID), but also the expensive licences.

      It's simply not needed in smaller offices. There's various cheapy/free IMAP systems you can use.

    6. Re:Before anyone opens their damned mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, he is a 20 user office. That is going to add at least $1k for access licenses. If they grow that is more money they have to fork out. Not a cheap solution. Plus he wanted a web server so he couldn't just ditch IIS.

  6. Mitel SME Server by jvhaarst · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd go for the Mitel SME server, a _very_ easy to install Linux distribution made for these kind of situations.
    Installation and maintenance is a no brainer.
    I think Mandrake and Suse also makes similar products.

    1. Re:Mitel SME Server by Partisan · · Score: 1

      Yes! Yes! Yes!
      Very newbie friendly.
      Very featureful. Does all the original poster asked for and more.
      Try it for free and then buy support later if you need it.

    2. Re:Mitel SME Server by danpbrowning · · Score: 2

      I concur.

      --
      Daniel
  7. Cobalt? by pmz · · Score: 1

    I don't have experience with them, but I have seen that Sun markets Cobalt servers that might be appropriate for your needs.

  8. Very very easy by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

    Go get an old pentium, with lots of harddrive space. USe freesco, a free linux router/ server project. There are addons such as samba, mail server, ftp server, ssh, all kinds of stuff.
    Check it out.
    www.freesco.org

  9. Flamebait AND Troll by Gothmolly · · Score: 2

    I've been trolled, so I'll flame.

    My company uses Linux extensively, and was just given $25million in 2nd round VC. So take that, troll. Just because you can't explain how Linux fits into the overall picture, doesn't mean that everyone else can't either.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  10. Solaris + PCNetlink by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Informative

    Solaris 8 ships free with their hardware, and the PC NetLink package can be downloaded for free. $999 for a 1U rackable Netra server gets you native NT4-style PDC and BDC support (NOT Samba, licensed from AT&T way back), DHCP, DNS, HTTP, etc.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Solaris + PCNetlink by Magus311X · · Score: 1

      Not only is it cheap, Sun has absolutely incredible tech support. You really can't beat it.

      As long as you're comfortable with a System V based UNIX, this is a VERY nice option.

  11. Comodity and ease by itzdandy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    just how computer savy are you?

    do you have linux experience?, BSD?

    i would suggest that if you are, that you go with comodity hardware, only the best equipment, and dont confuse highest quality with top of the line.

    AMD chips have proven themself very reliable and very fast for the price.
    Get a good ASUS,Soltek,Soyo,Abit, or Tyan motherboard and an AthlonXP 1500+, this is all you should need for a small office like you have, in fact prob. a little more.

    get crucial, corsair, or mushkin DDR memory. Some others are fine to but GET GOOD RAM!

    you can build a modest server for $600-$800 and run a Linux or BSD. You choise of distro but some are easier than others. For a super easy distro, mandrake8 has everything you need including samba, DHCP, and email servers on the disk, and it can be downloaded for free OR a version with some tech support can be had on the cheap from mandrakesoft.

    Also, Redhat offers setup and tech support for a good price on servers. They would come and set your system up for you and get you started, make your life easy for not too much $$. And RedHat is a very solid distro.

    Debian is GREAT, but hard to set up if your not a "guru"

    you can make a VERY good performing comodity PC function just fine for you until your company grows to need a higher end system.

    1. Re:Comodity and ease by Xavier+Shirin · · Score: 1

      In my admittedly small experience, I have not had many problems with Debian, and I have been using Linux for only 9 months. I haven't had any experience with setting up samba or a server of any kind, but the Debian install was quite intuitive, especially if you know someone who has done it before.

      But I would go with Red Hat unless you try Debian at home first. Red Hat is MUCH easier to install.

      --
      We do not cater to idiots.
  12. That's great. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    Now, can you explain how to use Linux reliably as a full-featured NT Domain Server? Easily? The guy needs a domain server that does file and print serving, DHCP, web serving, and SMTP. In an hour and a half, I could have a Windows 2000 server up and running doing all that. To suggest a salesman-turned-pseudo-techie waste his time learning Linux, how to configure Apache, SAMBA, dhcpd, sendmail, and some godawful clusterfuck solution like samba + CUPS/lpng/etc. would be absolutely laughable. Which is, of course, why everyone in this thread is suggesting it.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:That's great. by vertical_98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So a salesman-turned-techie is going to be able to setup a Win2K box, easier then a Linux box? Samba is fairly simple, even from a newbie point of view. DHCP? A cheap 486 with a Freesco disk stuck in it can handle his office.

      I used to work with people like you every day. We had a Compaq Prolient that served as a RAS server in our office. When it came time to replace it, I convinced the management to let me install a cheap box, running Freesco. I replaced a Pentium III - 800 box with 2 - 9 gig SCSI drives and 512M ram, with a P75 with 16meg RAM, no HD, and it did the job just fine. The NT Admin wanted to go out and by a brand-new Win2K server with all the trimmings, and refused to believe I could accomplish the same feat on a machine, I bought for $20.
      If he is going to get support, why does it matter if he runs, Windows or Linux? Is the Linux support worse than that provided by MS?

      Vertical

      --
      72 CD D7 52 D0 7E D8 47 44 91 D5 84 D1 59 F1 A9-This is my 128bit integer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:That's great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      E-smith.

    3. Re:That's great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the NT guy is waiting for your ancient Pentium powersupply to burn up so that he can go night of the longknives on you politically. Nobody ever got fired for buying a Proliant.

    4. Re:That's great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a salesman-turned-techie is going to be able to setup a Win2K box, easier then a Linux box?

      I know it sounds crazy, but yes. I've already said my act of contrition and done my five Hail Marys for even daring to suggest that someone should use Windows for a Windows domain and a bunch of other tasks that are point-and-drool in Windows.

      I used to work with people like you every day.

      No, you didn't.

      - A.P.

  13. Dartek = Bad by camt · · Score: 0

    I have never dealt with dartek directly, but I have dealt extensively with another company under the Systemax/MarchUSA umbrulla - Global Industrial Supply. I have to say that is the worst company I have ever dealt with in my life. My company no longer buys anything from Global Industrial nor Global Computer, simply because they had a 100% record of failing to fulfill our orders properly, etc. It took weeks to work out the returns and credits to our account.

    So...if they are anything like Global..I would avoid them like the plague.

  14. My opinion by joeblowme · · Score: 0

    If you want a plug in and work solution almost any of these things will work. You will definately need 2 of these things in case you have a problem. Since they aren't just regular computers you can't just throw new parts in them. This is a big set back for using them. Personally I'd just Buy a computer and stick Windows 2000 server on it. And buy a copy of exchange for that small of an organization you could easily do it for under the $3000 mark. You should also make sure you buy an internal tape backup for the computer. It's kind of confusing awnsering your question because you didn't mention what you may already have. If you have some sort of router, that may be able to be used for the dhcp. You get IIS when you buy Windows 2000 server. Also with windows you will have no problem getting your printers to work. Plus this solution is sure fire for expandability and upgrading later on. The nicest thing about going with the Windows solution is that if there is a problem you can always find someone to come out and fix it. I'd say to use linux but in a small organization it's been my experience that it's too hard to find qualified people to come out and work on them and any money you'd save on software you'd spend on tech support. Cost breakdown Computer with Pentium 3 1Ghz, 2 X 80 gig hardrives, 768mb pc133 ram and tape backup $1200 Windows 2000 server 20 user $680 Exchange $1100 Those are ball park figures but they should be close.

    --

    If your not cheating your not trying. If your not trying your not winning and if your not winning why play?
  15. Nice job everyone by xinu · · Score: 1
    Ok, I just noticed this thread of full of hostility. Wow. I'm amazed.

    I just went to that iMass website that was presented as a link in the post and I got a cute little banner advertising to all slashdot visitors. So now that everyone has done their trolling and flaming and even got some targeted advertising do we feel better? It's amazing how we have the epitamy of the web all bundled up into facad of a discussion.

    Use whats right for you at work. If it's an appliance, Linux, *BSD, UNIX(tm), or a Windows then so be it.

  16. ... in my professional opinion ... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Informative

    You're missing some essential information, such as how many users is your web server going to serve (the 20 office people, or 100k customers), is DHCP for the 20 workstations, or 1000 dialup users, and is your company Email intensive? Are the 20 people working there doing support Email for Microsoft, or just normal idle chatter?

    I'll assume it's a small company, with small company needs, with a little room for growth. If there are different needs, you'd probably need an additional server or two for whatever your loads are.

    I'll also have to assume you have a working knowlege of NT/W2K and Unix (Linux specifically). If not, this won't work very well for you. If I was hired at your place today, and told to do it, this is the way it would be done.

    First off, build the servers yourself, if you know how. I would build two servers, usage to be outlined below. This would be the order to my hardware vendor. They'll work within these specs, and have the parts to me the same day.

    -Fastest and most cost efficent CPU. Probably just over 1Ghz of either AMD or Intel
    -*GOOD* CPU Fan (you don't want to worry about it in a year)
    -Asus motherboard w/ integrated LAN & video
    -Crucial memory 512Mb. is a good start.
    -2 Western Digital IDE Hard drives. One smaller one (~16G) for the OS, one larger one (~100G)for any stored data.
    -Case. CalPC 1U Rackmount (for rack use), or Enlight midtower if you don't have a rack. ($300 cheaper for the midtower).

    Your cost should be betwen $800-$1000 per machine, depending on how bad your hardware vendor rips you off.

    You probably also want to buy a CD burner for your workstation. Tapes are cool and big and the bosses like having the tapes safely tucked away in the office vault, but it sucks waiting 8 hours for a restore to roll through, just to find out it didn't store even though everything looked like it did. Have a nice little stack of CD's with all the important stuff on it, and burn new ones occasionally (monthly?). CD's are a *LOT* cheaper than tapes anyways. (less than 50 cents each in bulk).

    You could save more money, buying a cheaper motherboard, or cheaper hard drives, but you'll find out it's really not worth it. Which would you prefer, having hardware that never fails, or getting a call every morning at 8am when the staff comes in and can't log in because the PDC is dead.

    Now you have two nice stable affordable servers, which will never cause you hardware problems or have mysterious crashes. We build out similiar machines for workstations, since they're cheap.

    If you're only doing a little file sharing, that's fine. If you're doing serious file storage, you should consider getting a RAID 5. I personally like the external IDE RAID's. It attaches to a SCSI card in the server, and has 5-6 IDE hard drives in it. There are quite a few companies that build them. IDE is a good choice, they run cool and are cheap if one fails. Because it's RAID 5, you just yank the broken one out, and stick in a new one, without doing anything (ours auto-rebuilds).

    On the first machine, set up WinNT/Win2k (forgive me).. Make this your PDC (for login auth), and Print server. That's it. Nothing else. Not a workstation or anything. You *could* let it be a workstation, but the gods of security will laugh at you.

    On the second machine, install Linux. I like Slackware (slackware.com). Configure dhcpd, httpd, samba, sendmail, pop3, and possibly imapd. To give you a hint of how easy it is, sendmail pop3 and imapd are already done. dhcpd takes all of about 5 lines in a conf file. httpd is already done, but you'll want to eventually customize. samba isn't all that hard, especially if you've done it before. I copy the same smb.conf around all over the place, just changing the machine's name and share specs.

    I've never set up samba to be a PDC or BDC, but it is very possible. It's documented, I've just never done it. You can make the Linux machine BDC, or use a low-end spare (Pentium 166 or so), or volunteer a NT4/W2k workstation.

    Honestly, you could have the slackware machine completely done in an hour.

    This way is probably a better choice in the long run. Those other companies may be out of business or not supporting your box in a year, and if something needs done, you could be screwed (buy a new box from us). With this solution, you're wide open to being able to fix things yourself. Do windowsupdates on the NT server, install the patches from TechNet. Fix whatever needs fixed on the Linux box (it's easy, honest)..

    Here's what it takes to do upgrades on the Linux machine.

    cd /usr/src/
    wget http://[whateverpackage]
    tar xvpzf [package].tar.gz
    cd [packagedir]
    ./configure
    make
    make install

    You won't even have to reboot. :)

    I apologize to anyone who thinks this is an unpopular approach, but it's worked very well in several businesses that either I've worked with or simply know someone working at. Little pieces change depending on use. Like, if you're trying to be a hosting company, you'd have multiple independent web servers.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:... in my professional opinion ... by MadCamel · · Score: 2

      I can vouch for that. A Windows machine to handle the really windows-ish stuff, and a slackware box for the heavy lifting is a good, balanced solution., and has worked very well for me in the past.

    2. Re:... in my professional opinion ... by Tower · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just another note - Get ECC memory. It costs a few bucks more, but if your chipset supports it (and almost all do since the BX) it is well worth it in the long run. A cheap, effective increase to data integrity is always a Good Thing.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  17. Anyone else notice.. by Judg3 · · Score: 2

    That at the bottom of the Dartek page for the iMass they have a banner which says "Attention Slashdot readers: Receive an instant rebate off the iMass of your choice"?

    The exact link to the pic is here. Odd eh? Talk about targeted advertsing

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:Anyone else notice.. by joe52 · · Score: 1

      The funny part is the line of text at the bottom of that graphic:

      "Instant rebate offer expires 1/31/02"

      When did they post that graphic? Assuming that it was in response to this article is that date a typo or is there really no rebate?

  18. Sun Netra X1s by lw54 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you don't decide to buy a premade solution, we're very happy with our Sun Netra X1s and at $995, they're quite affordable.

  19. a couple of them? by Snafoo · · Score: 1

    Salesguy: "Er, yeah, actually, our customers usually buy, like, a dozen or more. Because they're so good. Er."

    Tech: "Really? How many do you think *I* should get?"

    Salesguy: "What's your credit card limit like?"

    --
    - undoware.ca
  20. Netra X1's... by chris_martin · · Score: 1

    The are very small, 1U and can be racked in a rack, no need for a cabinet. A lot of intel 1U servers are so deep that you can't rack them in a 19" rack, you need a cabinet to support the back of the server. I currently have 12 of these things doing DNS, DHCP, web serving, WebObjects app serving, LDAP server, and file serving. Standard IDE HD's, you can mount two of them. I have one with 2 100GB drives. They also take standard PC-133 ECC RAM, up to 2GB. They also don't use much power.

    --
    -- Chris Martin, System Administrator
  21. Cobalt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://store.sun.com/catalog/doc/BrowsePage.jhtml? cid=60308&parentId=26829

  22. Cobalt and Celestix are both good choices. by SlashChick · · Score: 2

    The Cobalt Qube and Celestix servers are both excellent. The Qube 3 is actually exactly what you are looking for. Play with the demo here; get product information here.

    I would recommend against going with a barebones, non-appliance box. The reason I recommend Cobalt/Celestix is that they are a cinch to set up. They both have web-based UIs that let you set up email lists, file shares, etc. easily. I've used the Qube3 extensively and it simply rocks. I haven't used the Celestix stuff personally, but I've heard that it is just as good as Cobalt.

    Both are supported by a company that is used to supporting non-technical users, and neither require you to have a full-time Linux guru on staff.

    Your other choice is to run a Windows 2000 server, which is also pretty easy to set up and maintain. The Windows server will be more flexible for the future. Still, for as small a company as you have, an appliance would be a better solution for now.