NVIDIA Unveils (And Tom's Reviews) The GeForce4
EconolineCrush writes: "NVIDIA has finally revealed its GeForce4 Titanium and MX graphics processors. Tom's Hardware has a some benchmarks comparing the new offerings to current products, and the results are pretty interesting. Meanwhile, The Tech Report does an excellent job cutting through the hype with an examination of each new chip's features. Both articles are well worth reading to get the full story on the latest from NVIDIA."
I'm sick of these reviews with a line like "The results are *interesting*". Lets just agree that if the results weren't interesting, it shouldn't have been posted in the first place. By posting the article on slashdot, the "interesting" part is implied.
Please, go out on a limb, put on some body armor, and have the guts to say ONE MEANINGFUL SENTENCE about the results other than that they were "interesting". It's not that hard.
Of course, maybe I should learn to proof-read my own posts. :(
I hate to say it, but the GeForce4 Ti series is FASTER THAN MY OWN COMPUTER.
What the hell? Isn't that ridiculous? I'm running a 266MHz P2, and now these graphics cards are running at 300MHz. I know P2 MHz != GF4 MHz but even still.
Now all I need is for Intel to stop dragging their feet about releasing the mobile P4 and I'll be quickly snapping up one of their 1.7GHz mobile P4s with a GF4Go video card.
Then maybe another few years down the line the new graphics cards will be faster than my CPU. Go figure.
> Improving products should be banned!
It's an idea whose time has come! I mean, look at Microsoft; they're doing great!
Want Linux games? HERE.