Slashdot Mirror


9th Circuit: Thumbnails Are Big Enough For Fair Use

An anonymous reader submits: "According to an article from law.com, yesterday's decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (U.S.) will have far-reaching effects on web publishing. From the article: '... The court found that reproducing photographs to create thumbnail images is a fair use of the material, but displaying full-sized images violates the copyright owner's exclusive right to publicly display his works....But the court found that displaying the full-sized images through linking and framing was not transformative and harmed the market for the original photographs.' One lawyer is quoted as saying, 'It's basically going to do away with linking or framing without permission.'"

3 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. So what is a thumbnail defined as? by CaptCanuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Based on what they stated, any adjustment to the actual image can be considered enough of a change. One could scale to 99% the width and 99% the height and use that image to link to. Or perhaps just use the img width and height tags to display the linked image in a smaller size; you may be linking to the image but it's displayed in an altered form.

    I wonder if that's sufficient to get around the ruling.

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  2. This is not a troll... by catsidhe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... but is a serious question.

    What effect does this decision have on everyone in the world who isn't in the USA?

    Would enforcement rely on a Skylarov effect, or an 'effective place of publication' ruling, or both?

    --
    "This is a Hollywood movie: when it comes to the Laws of Physics, they're lucky if they get Gravity!" --- my wife