Slashdot Mirror


Vermont Goes Opt-In, Corps Unhappy

jeffy124 writes: "Beginning Feb 15, a new Vermont consumer protection law takes effect requiring companies doing business with people in VT to require opt-in before they can sell/share that customer's personal information. Naturally, companies aren't happy, and trade groups are suing the state, claiming the law will raise costs of doing business and hurt consumers."

3 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Raises costs, hurts consumers... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Raises Costs: Sounds like they view easy profits as an entitlement, and expect the state to pass corporate welfare legislation rather than consumer protection legislation.

    Hurts Consumers: Mebe we should ask the consumers about this instead? (Why the heck do they suppose the legislature passed the law in the first place?)

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  2. Catching up with Europe.... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Over hear in the land of the unfree we already have these protections. We also have some other consumer protections that might be worth having

    1) They can't sell your data unless you let them (two whole tick boxes)

    2) The data isn't considered a company asset when the .com goes tits up.

    And as for hurting consumers.... bollocks, totally and utter. Reducing SPAM, being in control of your own information. Hell this _is_ what consumers want.

    Go Vermont, full credit to some law makers who aren't just in the pockets of big business.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  3. I did this for a long time by legLess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend of mine works for the USPS, and she turned me on to it. It helps pay her salary, plus those business reply envelopes are expensive. She said the key was to get enough crap in the envelope that it weighed over an ounce.

    As a bonus, I made little flyers on bright paper: "This complete waste of your time and money was brought to you by [name, address] who would like to be removed from your mailing lists." I'd wrap a flyer around an ounce or so of ripped up paper and stuff that in the envelope.

    I viewed it as a lark, just a fun thing to do when I got home every day. But you know, after 6 months of it, my junk mail dropped dramatically. From 3 or 5 pieces a day to just 1 or 2 a week. In short, I'd strongly recommend this to anyone plagued by direct mail.

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."