Networks and Studios Against PVRs
HiredMan sent in an LA Times story talking about more suits against PVR makers
like Replay and Tivo. The most bizarre quote to me is that the
suit argues that "it's illegal to let consumers record and store shows based on the genre, actors or other words in the program description." Huh?
Next thing you know they won't allow people to take snapshots in Vegas because they're afraid people will be seeing all there is to see.
Useless opinions, worthless observations, and more!
Users don't need to know when "Friends" is on.
Neither do I, but the rest of America makes sure I do. =P
"Anonymous Coward" is for whistleblowers, not unpopular opinions.
I agree this PVR trend has gone quite far enough! If we continue to let people use these "magic boxes" to record TV shows, pause them, skip the commercials, or pretty much view the shows as they want to view them, then its only a matter of time before we slip into total anarchy!
It's a snowball effect....even today, I've been hearing rumors of people that buy blank reels of magnetic tape and put them in short, wide, black boxes to record shows when they're not home! They even use other buttons on their new-fangled "remote controls" other than Play, Pause, and Stop."
Someone stop this insanity before the child-actors from "Different Strokes" become destitute and are forced to rob convenience stores!
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
...it'd be illegal to watch shows based on the genre, actors or other words in the program description. There would be only one channel. Advertisements 24 hours a day, except, if we're all good little sheep, we might get a half hour of news & traffic reports at 6:00 am and 6:00 pm.
I am the very model of a modern major general!
Editorial nitpick: An analogy typically involves a comparison between two different things. For instance, "the automobile replacing the horse-drawn carriage" can be half of the analogy, with "the PVR versus Television industry" battle being the other half. The "Buggy Whip Manufacturers' Association" part of your analogy, for instance, made sense.
But then you went and included the "Horse Manure Shoveler's Association".
I don't mean to nitpick, but, if both halves of your analogy talk about the entertainment industry, it's not really an analogy, is it? ;-)
Detroit, MI - Nations Bank, Wachovia, and Citibank have brought a lawsuit naming Ford, Chrysler, and GM as defendants. According to the lawsuit, the auto manufacturers produce powerful cars that make it easier for consumers, using the vehicles as "getaway cars", to rob banks.
A spokeswoman for the banks involved in the suit said that although the banks favor automotive advances, "new automobile technology must go hand in hand with financial institution protection" and that "the consumer should bear the full cost and inconvenience of protecting the financial interests of huge, multi-billion dollar banking empires."
You don't think shovelling shit has relevance to the entertainment industry? You don't watch much TV huh ;-)
Fast, cheap & reliable. Pick two.
1 billion Chinese can't be wong.
Asikaa
Come in, twenty-seventy-seventy, your time is up.
SONNY: How do you turn on this here teevee?
RIKER: Teevee?
SONNY: Yeah, boob-tube...
DATA(to Riker)Oh -- I think he means television, sir.
DATA(to Sonny)That particular form of entertainment did not last much beyond the year Two Thousand Forty.
Star Trek: The Next Generation - "The Neutral Zone"
If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating