Slashdot Mirror


No-Tech Schools In Tech Land

manyoso writes: "This article in the Oregonian tells how some hi-tech parents at Intel are opting for a school without computers for their children. From the article: 'Conventional wisdom holds that children can only benefit from exposure to technology', but children, 'shouldn't spend first-grade skipping coloring and learning to keyboard... Emphasizing computers doesn't seem to enhance students' creativity and could even stifle it... We want them to eventually see what a computer can do for them, but only after they know what they can do for themselves.'" Clifford Stoll has argued and written along similar lines.

2 of 465 comments (clear)

  1. *stifles* creativity?? by MathJMendl · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    If anything, I think that computers encourage creativity. If you have a fast mind, the computer might be the only thing that can keep up with you, and think of all the possibilities on a computer! Coding lets you do nearly anything, and you could do graphic design or play imaginative games (I still remember playing Cosmic Osmo several years ago, a game by the creators of Myst that let you explore worlds)! I think it would be ok to do other things *in addition* to computers, but definitely not instead!

    --


    "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
  2. Re:Here here! by enneff · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    "I am a father of 5, and we home-school the children."

    Quite frankly I find this worrying.