Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Instant Messenger Virus Sweeps Net

Many people have reported a Warhol virus affecting users of Microsoft Instant Messenger. If you get messaged, "Go To http://www.masenko-media.net/cool.html NoW !!!", or any similar message (apparently there are several websites with the infection code), I suggest not following the link. A brief discussion follows.

Sequence: Get messaged "Go To http://www.masenko-media.net/cool.html NoW !!!" or something similar with another URL. Follow the link. That webpage contains malicious code which gets your messenger contacts and sends a similar message to your contacts. It looks like it uses a vulnerability in formmail.pl as well, although I'm not exactly sure how (I'm not an expert in ECMAscript, sorry, and I have no systems that could possibly be affected by this to test with). I'm sure some of our readers can provide more information in the comments below.

There appear to be several webpages which carried the infected code, not just masenko-media.net. Some webmasters are already taking them down.

Sophistication: moderate. Damage: only your pride.

Solution: probably the latest mega-patch for Internet Explorer will fix the Microsoft bug that allowed this.

Risks: obviously, the code could have done worse than just messaging your contacts. With Microsoft making "messaging" an integrated part of the operating system, any flaws in it can be exploited to affect millions of people instantly, so it is a high-value target. Does it have commensurate high-strength security?

16 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. First Post by Metrollica · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Suck it!

    --



    --Metrollica
  2. Darn, too late by Guspaz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just submitted a lengthy story about this. Oh well. On another note, have you signed the futurama petition? Fox is canceling it. http://www.petitiononline.com/futufu/petition.html PS: First comment? By me? Wow!

  3. Re:this didn't infect me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    How in the hell is this 'informative'? Moderators, put down the pipe and get your asses back in school.

  4. Re:this didn't infect me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Nice to see this getting modded up!

    I have 49 karma and usually don't post AC but I didn't want moderators thinking I used that software...you know, linux. It's kind of embarrasing, you know, since all my friends are Windows users.

  5. Evildoers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    USA please execute these terrorists.

  6. My Slashdot Commenting Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Sorry, but I have to post this anonymously as I don't want to be moderated off-topic.

    My Slashdot Commenting Study

  7. Mod Parent Troll DOWN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    this luzer used WWW, they didnt whois it right, the domain exists

    whoever modded this luzer up was smoking crack

  8. Re:interesting article on the reg by calags · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You know a really virulent virus is coming when Microsoft insiders sudden sell as much MS stock as they can. Just like the Enron higher ups they'll cut and run.

    This brings up a question: If a real devastating security flaw is reported to them; they keep mum about it and then a massive security breach occurs that wipes out most MS OS machines out there (you know it's bound to happen :) does that mean that the SEC can move on them due to insider information?

    --
    Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  9. See you at school? by Omega · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Anna says:
    See you at Masenko-Media!

  10. Re:ToO mAnY cApS!!!11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    HaHa j00 R tEh funAY!

  11. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Do you really think /. is a place for reasoned and civil discussion of interesting topics?

    Your User ID isn't brand new... Weird...

  12. What is .NET? by bahwi · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    What is .NET?

    Well, here's the answer. =)

  13. KDE is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Some KDE Myths.

    KDE Myth: Koffice owns, Kspread, Kword..they own, Gnome-office sucks.

    Truth:
    o Gnumeric has made some huge steps in the last 6 months, with the
    semi-intergration of Guppi (graphing)...its a very stable Spreadsheet
    application, offers many features that kspread dreams of. More Functions,
    more file filters,.. Kspread is more like a budget/cutdown version of
    Gnumeric.

    To put it blutantly KDE toolbars and general gui design are/have always
    been a mess.

    o Abiword also offers similar benefits of Gnumeric (features and File
    Filters) hey does Kword have a good import/exprt RTF?! alpha-quality? wtf?
    How long has Kword been in-existence? and they still cant properly render
    RTF still? Even the list of known filters (export and import) available
    looks very sad. http://www.koffice.org/filters/status.phtml

    Considering Abiword is also being developed for many other platforms, its
    done pretty well so far. Can you say WYSIWYG?

    o Kivio doesnt offer everything you would want, and if you want specific
    stencils, you have to fork out for them...Is this where FreeSoftware is
    going? We get cutdown versions of a product,... DIA isnt bound to a
    company hard bent in making a profit. So when DIA starts employing some of
    these Stencils, what happens then? you spent $$$ for nothing?

    http://www.thekompany.com/products/kivio/stencil s. php3

    KDE Myth: Konq ownz mozilla, netscape etc...

    Truth: Mozilla is truely more standards complient, as of late 0.9.4+
    series, The Mozilla engine is really starting to shine now, Konq has
    always had a hard time rendering any DHTML/Javascript, even with some
    webpages the fonts are screwed.
    Mozilla isnt Perfect, but hey, everything renders properly. Konq trys to
    hard to be "Internet Explorer" on the linux desktop, Its time to
    completely drop the KHTML shit, If theres a better, more mature
    engine...use it. KHTML was once needed, now its not.. And if you want to
    Compare Gnome Galeon,..I dare you.

    Nautalus was once critised as being a slow, dog, rah rah.. well it was,
    yeah it was slow,...but it has improved, but it seems kde users still like
    to think that. Well if it makes you happy. Nautalus is very themeable

    http://jimmac.musichall.cz/screenshots/ximian-so ut h-metatheme.jpeg Its a
    welcome change away from the Windows File Manager look.

    KDE Myth: GTK+ is just damn ugly

    So you havent tried the abundance of GTK+ themes? cleanice? eazel?
    thinice? pixmap?
    Yeah, Gtk themes that have been around longer than kde2... and with the
    upcoming release of GTK2, themes are getting better and faster. Themes
    under KDE just dont look "pretty". Even Gnome icons are better. So
    customising Gnome to look differently isnt that hard..however KDE just
    looks like that, Mosfet just looks tacky.

    KDE Myth: We have all the cool appz. QT/KDE rulesss!

    Oh really? So lets now count Evolution, GIMP, Red Carpet, Xchat, XMMS,
    Galeon, Balsa, Gnumeric, Pan, Abiword, mplayer, Glade, Anjuta ...Gnome/GTK
    has plently of cool apps.

    KDE Myth: Gnome is loosing, its dead, just use KDE.

    Well considering most new distros have KDE preinstalled as default, ie,
    Mandrake, Lindows, Caldera, Corel, Suse ..and some other I missed out, its not
    surprising Gnome is losing *some* support, But with Ximian and Redhat
    Gnome/GTK will keep on living. QT is hardly community developed, GTK+ has always been community developed...and thus we as the linux community we _should_ support it.

  14. CAPITALS ARE GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    THNK Y R WRNG BT T MNY
    CPS. S CMMDR 64 CMPTR T
    CNNCT T TH NTRNT VN NC
    WRT JN KTZ T TLL HM BT TH
    MVS DWNLD T WTCH LK BRB
    WR LK THT N WTH TH WMN
    PML WH DS NT CHS TH BRQ.
    THNK T S VRY GD THT M
    LLWD T S LL CPTL LTTRS T
    PST T SLSHDT ND HP THT T
    DS NT HRT MY NGLSH.

    YR FRND,
    JNS.

    P.S. T S VRY SD THT TRRRSTS
    HV TTCKD TH MCRSFT
    NSTNT MSSNGR. N FGHNSTN
    W GRV FR THS LSS.

  15. KDE Myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Some KDE Myths.,,

    KDE Myth: Koffice owns, Kspread, Kword..they own, Gnome-office sucks.

    Truth:
    o Gnumeric has made some huge steps in the last 6 months, with the
    semi-intergration of Guppi (graphing)...its a very stable Spreadsheet
    application, offers many features that kspread dreams of. More Functions,
    more file filters,.. Kspread is more like a budget/cutdown version of
    Gnumeric.

    To put it blutantly KDE toolbars and general gui design are/have always
    been a mess.

    o Abiword also offers similar benefits of Gnumeric (features and File
    Filters) hey does Kword have a good import/exprt RTF?! alpha-quality? wtf?
    How long has Kword been in-existence? and they still cant properly render
    RTF still? Even the list of known filters (export and import) available
    looks very sad. http://www.koffice.org/filters/status.phtml

    Considering Abiword is also being developed for many other platforms, its
    done pretty well so far. Can you say WYSIWYG?

    o Kivio doesnt offer everything you would want, and if you want specific
    stencils, you have to fork out for them...Is this where FreeSoftware is
    going? We get cutdown versions of a product,... DIA isnt bound to a
    company hard bent in making a profit. So when DIA starts employing some of
    these Stencils, what happens then? you spent $$$ for nothing?

    http://www.thekompany.com/products/kivio/stencil s. php3

    KDE Myth: Konq ownz mozilla, netscape etc...

    Truth: Mozilla is truely more standards complient, as of late 0.9.4+
    series, The Mozilla engine is really starting to shine now, Konq has
    always had a hard time rendering any DHTML/Javascript, even with some
    webpages the fonts are screwed.
    Mozilla isnt Perfect, but hey, everything renders properly. Konq trys to
    hard to be "Internet Explorer" on the linux desktop, Its time to
    completely drop the KHTML shit, If theres a better, more mature
    engine...use it. KHTML was once needed, now its not.. And if you want to
    Compare Gnome Galeon,..I dare you.

    Nautalus was once critised as being a slow, dog, rah rah.. well it was,
    yeah it was slow,...but it has improved, but it seems kde users still like
    to think that. Well if it makes you happy. Nautalus is very themeable

    http://jimmac.musichall.cz/screenshots/ximian-so ut h-metatheme.jpeg Its a
    welcome change away from the Windows File Manager look.

    KDE Myth: GTK+ is just damn ugly

    So you havent tried the abundance of GTK+ themes? cleanice? eazel?
    thinice? pixmap?

    Yeah, Gtk themes that have been around longer than kde2... and with the
    upcoming release of GTK2, themes are getting better and faster. Themes
    under KDE just dont look "pretty". Even Gnome icons are better. So
    customising Gnome to look differently isnt that hard..however KDE just
    looks like that, Mosfet just looks tacky.

    KDE Myth: We have all the cool appz. QT/KDE rulesss!

    Oh really? So lets now count Evolution, GIMP, Red Carpet, Xchat, XMMS,
    Galeon, Balsa, Gnumeric, Pan, Abiword, mplayer, Glade, Anjuta ...Gnome/GTK
    has plently of cool apps.

    KDE Myth: Gnome is loosing, its dead, just use KDE.

    Well considering most new distros have KDE preinstalled as default, ie,
    Mandrake, Lindows, Caldera, Corel, Suse ..and some other I missed out, its not
    surprising Gnome is losing *some* support, But with Ximian and Redhat
    Gnome/GTK will keep on living. QT is hardly community developed, GTK+ has always been community developed...and thus we as the linux community we _should_ support it.

  16. source code by daverr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    where can I get the source code? I love learning about how virus' work and how they control apps remotely