Verisign Responds to Wait List Criticism

spooge21 writes: "Verisign published new documents today regarding the proposed Domain Wait List service. The new documents include the revised VeriSign Domain Name Wait list Service Proposal, the VeriSign GRS Responses to Wait List Service Questions and the Wait List Service Justification Document."

Comments

Phirst Poast?

[Anonymous Coward]

Kathleen !worth good spelling or grammar.

Kathleen, I wanted to do this in this most potentially embarassing way possible, and I figured doing it here and now, in front of a quarter of a million strangers was as good a way as any. I love you more then I can describe within the limits of this tiny little story. We've been together for many years now, and I've known for most of that time that I wanted to spend my life with you. Enough rambling. Will you marry me?

Embarrassing. Double 'r', double 's'.

I also disagree with your use of then. Than is used to be comparative. Then is indicative of expressions of time or timing and consequence.

It's wiser being good than bad; It's safer being meek than fierce; It's fitter being sane than mad. --R. Browning.

Might I suggest a more heartfelt and serious way of proposal? What was the diamond on the ring? A penguin-shaped imperfect piece of shit bought at the mall last minute? Zales? I doubt Mr. JUBEI [cmdrtaco.net] machine knows an SI-J from a VVS1-E. You are very heavily 'included,' Malda. Can you think of s shittier and more clichéd day to propose, or is Valentine's Day king shit of that Tird Island? She must be a lobotomized retard, otherwise your would-be spouse would have spit in your face.

Hey, loserboi, don't forget to invite Larry Wall to the wedding and write your vows in a Perl Script. Then you can "chomp" down on your cake.

You don't have to be a Kreskin to see this loser elopement ending in the very near future.

This is crap, Malda. A fifth grader can be more romantic than this garbage drivel. I wonder how often you were dropped as a kid. This is pathetic. I feel bad for your wife.

What about improper deletion?

[www.sorehands.com]

I have seen many reports of Network solutions improperly deleting domain names. Then when someone else grabs it, Network solutions says, "Sorry, here is your registration fee back."

How will they correct this? Will they have an incentive to accidently lose registrations?

registration outage

[Perdo]

Un-scheduled domain registration outage. We have disabled the domain tool due to an un-scheduled outage of the .com/.net./org registry. At this time, we have isolated the source of the outage to the CNO registry operator. The expected length of this outage is unknown. We are closely monitoring this situation, and will continue to issue updates as new information becomes available. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Shared Registry

[Perdo]

The original Shared Registry System Protocol (version 0.9) was developed by CORE together with Emergent, Inc. in the context of the creation of a registry system suitable for the registration of the anticipated seven new top level domains. Due to the political change, CORE was unable to start the registration of those domains. Instead, CORE got the opportunity to register COM, NET and ORG (CNO) domains via the registry spin-off of Network Solution Inc. As the infrastructure had already been set up and was working, CORE decided to extend the registry system instead of the development of a new system specific to CNO domains. The server system was extended to synchronize its database with NSIRegistry's via the Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP). The payload of the SRSP was modified to conform to the new needs. The development was performed by Computer Service Langenbach GmbH, and the SRSP got the version number 1.0.

This document describes the version 1.1 of the protocol, which is mostly a cosmetic update of the payload and does not introduce much new functionality.