Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

High-End Apache

Posted by timothy on from the upper-crust dept.

BoarderPhreak writes: "Everything Solaris today posted a follow-up to the original 'Apache: The Basics' article entitled, 'Apache: Handling Traffic' which goes into detail about various methods of load-balancing and redundancy and mentions using Rsync for replication."

1 of 20 comments (clear)

  1. Re:apache is dying by Christopher+Cashell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would you like to back up your statements with facts, or should I just file your post under the "useless trolling post filled with garbage passed off as facts"?

    The latest Netcraft survey shows Apache having gained, with IIS having dropped slightly, and Apache is still well over 50%.

    Apache 2.0 is progressing nicely, and the latest 1.3.x release was made only a few weeks ago. How exactly does that show that 2.0 isn't slated for release, and the code is going closed?

    Lastly, even if your groundless statements were true, why in the world would we start over writing a web server? We've got the source for Apache, and it's a pretty slick web server. Don't you think it'd make more sense to continue it's development, forked if needed (which isn't needed)?

    Bah.

    --
    Topher