Slashdot Mirror
FCC's Powell On Monopolies
A reader writes: "According to this Washington Post article, the FCC's Michael Powell wants to do via rulemaking what Congress wouldn't - give a big wet kiss to the Baby Bells. Proposed rules would exempt future investments in broadband from unbundling requirements that make competitive local exchange carriers like Covad viable, instead considering (pretending?) that cable, satellite, DSL, and whatever future broadband the Bells choose to deploy are sufficient competition. Says Powell: "our greatest challenge in promoting broadband is deciding how best to stimulate enormous private sector investment." Consumer advocates are of course not amused."
This is going to nuke ISP's that use MegaCentral from qwest, not Covad who gets their own unbundled line elements.
Unbundled lines wont be going away anytime soon.
-- dieman - Scott Dier
I just submitted this story to slashdot. In any case, here is an article on Newsfactor, explaining how this decision will release the phone companies from their obligations to open their networks to rivals. Here is the action by the FCC, and here is a dissent by Commissioner Michael J. Copps, who warns that the commission is committing itself to "specific and potentially drastic changes to our precedent that carry with them enormous impacts in the market".
Michael Powell isn't the FCC's as a institution. He is the man George W. Bush appointed.
Don't go blaming the FCC for sucking up to big businesss contributors, and their attempts to stifle competition using political influence. It's not them.
Remember people, elections have consequences.
Of course they're related. What do you expect?
c net
http://news.com.com/2100-1033-251314.html?legacy=
Whatever Happened to Broadband? Return competition to the marketplace, find out why the Tauzin-Dingell bill will destroy the high-speed internet marketplace instead of expanding it and who's responsible.