Slashdot Mirror


Disinformation.com

Sure, we are being lied to by bloated, corporatized media all the time. What else is new? The great promise of the Net and Web has always been more truth: a great, hyper-linked network of diverse, individual expression, a vast, linked alternative subculture. There is hope. You can go to the Disinformation Web Site to see that idea in action, despite the AOL-ing and MSN-ing of cyberspace. This trove -- its content ranges from "The X-Men" and "Space Mutation" to "The Matrix" to pieces on the Real Jesus and Radiohead -- is what the Web is really about. It offers perspectives you definitely won't find anywhere in the mass media. Don't miss Marty Beckerman's "Death to all Cheerleaders 1." (Marty, whose piece became a book, was canned from a daily newspaper for observing that cheerleaders were "a urine stain on the toilet seat of America.")

The site's left-of-center-pieces -- with generous links to other POVs -- vary wildly in quality and usefulness, but you can find some real gems on disinfo.com. Taken together, the stories on this important, possibly even landmark site are a sharp indictment of the humorless and tepid way the popular media screen out opinion and commentary that's different, provocative or original.

We know too well that most mainstream media -- TV networks, major newspapers and newsmagazines, commercial news web sites -- have been corporatized, homogenized and mass-marketed by profit-obsessed corporate execs from Disney and General Electric. They could as well be -- and simultaneously are -- selling them park tickets and light bulbs as ideas and opinions. Newspapers have grown stupefyingly boring, their commentary relegated to snoozy op-ed pages. Cable TV, once the great hope, is becoming a nightmare of fragmentation, eternal argument and dogmatic fanaticism. Except for slight variations -- Fox News' interesting right-wing tilt, for example -- most mainstream news organizations stock to a militantly moderate point of view, veering a wee bit to the right or a tad to the left but never much further.

The target audience of most major media, from your daily paper to Time and CNN, is the appliance-and-car acquiring middle class, who seem to like their politics tepid and lite, the way AOL users like their Net. With media so firmly in the grip of market research, it's tough to know what they might cover if they were left to their own imaginations.

"Disinformation" is, to say the least, different. It was launched in l996 by Richard Metzger, now edited by Alex Burns. It's arguably one of the best-designed and most interesting alternative news and underground culture sites online. Apart from its own content, the site provides a subculture search engine which directs a reader to sites and relevant links. The site's political bias is clearly leftish, but its links are refreshingly open-minded, incorporating ideas, opinions and responses far beyond traditional definitions of "progressive." In fact, Disinformation is really, in many ways, a dogma killer. Despite the editors' viewpoint, readers get drawn into all sorts of opinions and debates any time they pursue a story or essay.

Apart from the excitement generated by a website that circulates about alternative ideas -- ideas the Net helps to keep alive -- Disinformation is beautifully designed. There's a Disinformation store, of course, offering T-shirts and books. There's easy access to stories by popularity and topic -- from activism and aliens to media, mind control, spirituality and technology. For all the ballyhoo and media hype about sites like Slate, with its heavy Microsoft subsidy, Disinformation really seems to get the fusion between interactivity and ideas. It's an exciting place to browse.

From the beginning, the Net was meant to open up information and give voice to different kinds of people and points of view. The Web, with its hyperlinking, took that idea still further. But in the past few years, that notion seems to have grown tired, in between the copyright wars, the dot.com era and the so-called Net slump. It seemed that corporate America -- Yahoo, MSN and AOL -- was devouring the Web whole. That's why sites like Disinformation are so important. They are the real heart of the Web.

3 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Opposing Viewpoints by zpengo · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    If you really want opposing viewpoints, just let me know. I can pretty much guarantee that I oppose whatever you believe. That even goes for you lefty pseudo-radical Gen-Xers who fancy yourselves to be rebellious. Come get some.

    Of course, I probably shouldn't be saying that here, the site most known for modding down anything that goes against the party line. :-)

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  2. Re:How is this different? by freeweed · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    And just how is Marty Beckerman's taunting a cheerleader different from the "cool kids" taunting "geeks"

    Because cheerleaders are known to get laid... and rather often at that :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  3. Re:Indymedia and WRH are crap by schmaltz · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Nooo, that's riiight, we all need to just shut up and let our "elected" "leaders" pilot this thing wherever they want to take it. Whether perfectly truthful or not, Indymedia and its cousins are doing what early American press owners were doing: making available information about their "leaders" that would otherwise be difficult to come by.

    Of course, use it with your own judgement. Many of the statements made on WhatReallyHappened.com are not easily proven. However, they need to be made, and some of them are not all that implausible.

    For example, as a New Yorker, I am still angry that our military had no timely protective response to two, count 'em, TWO! commercial jetliners crashing into my city's tallest buildings. And it opens up a passle of questions that remain unsatisfactorily answered to this moment. Why weren't fighter jets in the air over DC, like immediately?? Why didn't Bush order protective action? After decades of cold-war alert, did the military really just do a deer-in-the-headlights routine? I don't buy it. It's clearly on the record that he allowed himself to continue to be preoccupied -and did not engage his advisors or military liaisons- with his visit to a school, even after being notified of the attacks. That's plain suspicious.

    So, if our government won't investigate itself, others must. Balance is necessary in our universe.

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?