Slashdot Mirror


TI Lands OMAP in a Pocket PC.

An anonymous reader writes: "TI has officially invaded Intel's territory, having landed its OMAP chip in HP's Jornada 928. TI also landed a SmartPhone reference design agreement with Microsoft, but so did Intel. See the article, and a picture of the unit at Forbes.com."

75 comments

  1. I'm dissapointed. by Bonker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't TI know they're supposed to rename any chip for portable/handheld use so that it's an Anime reference?

    *cough* Dragonball *cough*

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:I'm dissapointed. by Bonker · · Score: 1

      Should TI have called it EVANGELION or something?

      Man, I'd buy a handheld with an EVA or NERV branded processor so fast, it would make most geekboys' heads spin.

      I can see it now, "When you need a handheld as powerful as the Magi..." or "When you need data protection strong as an AT field..."

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  2. The article wasn't clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does this mean that the Jornada in question isn't a Pocket PC 2002 device any more?

    1. Re:The article wasn't clear by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      From the article: " The Jornada 928 combines a PDA based on Microsoft's PocketPC operating system with a mobile phone capable of handling e-mail and Web access using a technology called General Packet Radio Service."

      What's not clear?

    2. Re:The article wasn't clear by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does this mean that the Jornada in question isn't a Pocket PC 2002 device any more?

      No. The Pocket PC 2002 uses an ARM processor which can be made by anybody, and TI, Motorolla and Intel all manufacture ARM processors.

      I'm not sure which brand HP was using prior to this, but I was surprised to see this as 'news'.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:The article wasn't clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I see. I was under the impression that the SA line of chips was only manufactured by Intel.

    4. Re:The article wasn't clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Based on PocketPC OS" and "Pocket PC 2002" are not equivalent.

      The second is a specific (certified) subset of the first.

    5. Re:The article wasn't clear by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Older generations of HP Jornadas (the 54x series) used the Hitachi SH3.

    6. Re:The article wasn't clear by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      StrongARMs are only made by Intel; OMAP is ARM-compatible but it's not a StrongARM.

    7. Re:The article wasn't clear by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      ARM != StrongARM.

      This is very similar to how Athlon != IA-32. Don't confuse an architecture with an implementation of that architecture.

      --Joe
    8. Re:The article wasn't clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... Being that SA11xx was a requirement for Pocket PC 2002 Certification, perhaps this Jornada isn't a PPC2k2?

      Does anyone have a link to the certification requirements?

    9. Re:The article wasn't clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Looks like the requirement is for a 32-bit ARM-based chip. Here's an article that mentions it.

  3. Re:What the hell is wrong with slashdot!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all depends on your way of thinking :)

  4. Microsoft and "standards" by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Flamebait


    Umm two standards from Microsoft with one thing in common.....

    Microsoft

    Well what a suprise, in some ways this must be a massive boon to the people associated with Symbian as it means Microsoft has a fragmented strategy and is pissing off its partners. Could this be the beasts strategy for this market, lots of deals with lots of people so it doesn't progress anywhere ? Wait till Moore's law allows WindowsXP to run on Mobiles, probably 5 years by my calculations.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  5. To Intel from TI: by Cheetah86 · · Score: 1

    Don't mess with Texas (Instruments)!

  6. Who said this: by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "If you combine a cell phone with a PDA, you're either going to get a PDA that's a crappy cellphone or a cellphone that's a crappy PDA"

    As cool as this looks, I don't think the above has been invalidated yet. I'll STILL point to the example that came up with Qualcomm's PDA/Cellphone: What happens when you want to talk to comeone and LOOK AT YOUR PDA at the same time? (Nah, I don't carry the hands free earbud everywhere I go...it's got a CABLE...it gets TANGLED.)

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Who said this: by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2
      I don't remember who said that, but I remember the article. The problem stems from having opposing customer requirements.

      People want cell phones to be small and unobtrusive.

      People want PDA displays and interfaces as big as possible and still be portable and convenient.

      It's a 'have your cake and eat it, too' problem.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:Who said this: by DevilsTower · · Score: 1

      What happens when I want to use the PDA and I'm on the phone? I tap the "speakerphone" button for a moment and carry on talking while I look something up.

      It's a lot more convient than what happens when I'm on the phone and don't -have- a PDA with me.

    3. Re:Who said this: by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      But if your going to carry both a PDA and a cell phone almost always...

      Jeremy

    4. Re:Who said this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why carry two devices? Odds are good you will not have one around when you need the other; eventually you will lose or misplace one of them. Not a problem when you only have to worry about keeping track of a single device.

    5. Re:Who said this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score 3, "interesting"????

      You moderators are clueless. This should have been moded down as clueless, too.

      I have a Kyocera Smartphone. It is very easy to use the speaker phone and the Palm functions at the same time. Ridiculously easy. Transparently easy. As far as I know this is true of all the other cell phone/PDA combos, as well.

      Clueless naysayers, stop knocking something you know nothing about.

  7. Competition by Renraku · · Score: 2

    Wow. Some competition. Guess we'll soon start seeing Microsoft TI-89 calculators coming out.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  8. TI-85 by aardwolf64 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well... I guess with TI's calculator background we don't have to worry about any floating point errors...*grin*

  9. Re:VA is dying by Commienst · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is actually pretty funny. It should at least get a +1.

    -Commienst (anon so I do not lose karma for defending this post)

    --

    I am into the copy and paste.
  10. Nokia 9210 by MosesJones · · Score: 2


    Its a better phone (if a little big) because of the PDA functions, and the PDA is superb.

    And its actually available in the US as the 9290. Nokia are very smooth also can be used as a terminal emulator to plug into a switch or firewall via the RS232 cable it comes with.

    And as for the talking thing.... the Nokia has a full and very good speaker phone, so its open on my desk right now. You can do everything while on a call.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Nokia 9210 by Matey-O · · Score: 2

      You're not from here are ya? )/me looks at email address.) See, you're from _over_there_. You've had better phone stuff your YEARS! :P

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  11. ARM by Lewisham · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The ones to watch out for are ARM. They have a tendency to sneak their way into practically everything: cars, mobile phones, PSIONs, even your Gameboy Advance.

    They have their sticky thumbs in a lot of different pies and because of the practical collapse of PSION handhelds, are probably itching to get back into the palmtop market.

    Oh, they're also in your iPod too, and quite possibly your car :)

    1. Re:ARM by edremy · · Score: 2

      "Get back into the palmtop market"??? They've never left: the iPaq and a dozen other PocketPC devices are already StrongARM based.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    2. Re:ARM by Lewisham · · Score: 1

      Really? Their web site doesn't make that fact very apparent :)
      They seem far more interested in cars. That gets another menu layer :)

    3. Re:ARM by pecka · · Score: 1

      hmm, and i thought that intel owns all ARM's patents. So ARM = intel infact.

    4. Re:ARM by JordoCrouse · · Score: 2

      They have a tendency to sneak their way into practically everything: cars, mobile phones, PSIONs, even your Gameboy Advance.

      And this is a problem?

      The ARM architecture has consistantly shown to be a cheap and easy to use processor with low power requirements, and a complete set of integrated components. Whats more, the ARM chips are fully supported under both Linux and Pocket PC.

      It is not by chance that most of the PDAs being readied for production this year are StrongArm based (see here
      for a list of those PDAs that support Linux).

      I'm not one to support a monopoly for the sake of having a monopoly, but if a company manages to crawl to the top based on superior products, I can only say one thing: w00t.

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    5. Re:ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFM -- OMAP includes an ARM (generally an ARM 9) and a TI DSP

    6. Re:ARM by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should actually *read* the ARM website you link to.

      OMAP is an ARM core with extra DSP functions. TI makes it.

      StrongARM is an ARM core with lots of flexibility (ie reconfigurable pins). Intel makes it.

      XScale is an ARM core with some neat extra extensions and very high clockspeed. Intel makes it.

      NETsilicon makes a neat little ARM7TDMI core processor with an ethernet controller in it. Nearly a full system on chip.

      Other companies produce various ARM cores. Almost everyone and their dog makes ARM core chips. A project got shut down recently on Opencores that had an open design ARM core chip that you could make in your garage fab (shea)! It is very difficult to find someone NOT developing a handheld today on top of any other processor. All the PocketPC devices are ARM core. New PalmOS devices are (imminently) ARM. This handheld is ARM. Gameboy Advance is ARM. I have two telephones on my desk that have StrongARM's in them. (Another admittedly has a PPC core)

      Get back into the palmtop market? You must be smoking crack.

      ~GoRK

    7. Re:ARM by jonr · · Score: 2

      No. Intel licences the ARM core from ARM Ltd. AFAIK, ARM is still an independent company.

    8. Re:ARM by pslam · · Score: 1
      hmm, and i thought that intel owns all ARM's patents. So ARM = intel infact.

      The StrongARM was actually designed by Digital, not Intel. Intel bought up StrongARM along with Digital, but they didn't get the core patents with it. ARM is making quite a mint out of licensing their cores.

      TI has been one of ARM's rivals in the DSP business. I suppose this means TI has given up, now. The fun thing about ARM cores is they're pretty much as powerful as DSPs at an equivalent cost, even though they implement an easy to program architecture. I guess the DSP manufacturers are learning the hard way about how important ease of development is these days.

    9. Re:ARM by HoserHead · · Score: 1
      I suppose this means TI has given up, now.
      Not at all. OMAP is an ARM chip and a TI DSP.

      TI recognises that ARM does a much better job as a GPP (General Purpose Processor) than any DSP, and also that its customers want ARM. Bundling the two means that there is less memory and power required to run the devices. There's a good reason so many companies are now going with TI for their ARM needs (Palm, most cell phone manufacturers, now HP, etc) - they're good at making small chips which use less power than the competition do more.

      Another poster described the various offerings made by different companies in the ARM business. The thing which is different about OMAP and XScale, among others, is not that they have "DSP Features," but that they have a complete DSP on-chip. (Maybe even on-die; I'm not positive.) A similar technology is behind many cellular phones, such as the recent ones Nokia produces. The ARM runs the OS, and the DSP handles all the cell phone signal handling, as it was designed to do.

      Disclaimer: I also work for TI, with Mechanik.
      Double-disclaimer: We don't work in hardware.

    10. Re:ARM by pslam · · Score: 1
      TI recognises that ARM does a much better job as a GPP (General Purpose Processor) than any DSP, and also that its customers want ARM. Bundling the two means that there is less memory and power required to run the devices.

      Well, bundling just one core which is efficient at both (not unreasonable) would be more efficient on memory and power. Being good at DSP doesn't mean you can't be good at being a GPP (and vice versa). Most DSPs are bad at being GPPs because they have weird word sizes (like 24 bit) or weird memory architecture (program/X/Y RAM, no byte access), or blatant limitations (fixed size hardware stacks).

      I suspect the reason for going with ARM is to do with development effort. There's already tons of software written for ARM processors. And if you run Linux (or Windows CE) on it, you've got support for pretty much every device you can think of out-of-the-box. And all that code you wrote one day for a PC or other similar architecture in C will "just work" on it too. I guess there must also be a ton of software already written for existing TI DSPs - and that can all get reused.

      The thing which is different about OMAP and XScale, among others, is not that they have "DSP Features," but that they have a complete DSP on-chip

      From what I've read the XScale doesn't have a "DSP" as such on-chip. It implements ARM9 style 2x16bit SIMD operations, but they also bolted on a separate multiply-accumulate unit which can run concurrently to everything else. However, execution is issued from the same pipeline as everything else so it's not exactly concurrent and it's also (strangely) not single cycle. As far as I can tell it's only just faster than doing MACs without it. Perhaps I'm missing something :)

    11. Re:ARM by Jack+Greenbaum · · Score: 1
      • Maybe you should actually *read* the ARM website you link to.

        OMAP is an ARM core with extra DSP functions.


      OMAP is a single chip with BOTH an ARM core and a TI 55x DSP core (and a bunch of peripherals too).
    12. Re:ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If memory serves, ARM was born out of an alliance between Apple Computer and a British firm called Acorn. Apple wanted to use Acorn's processor in the Newton, and they set up a holding company called ARM Holdings (ARM stands for Advanced RISC Machines) to develop the chip and manage its patents. Acorn eventually changed its focus to something else entirely, changed its name to Element 14 and was later swallowed up by Broadcom. The Newton, as we all know, has been consigned to history. But ARM Holdings is still going strong. It owns a little peice of every ARM-based chip manufactured out there.

      Intel, if memory serves properly, got its hands on the core that eventually become StrongARM and XScale buy buying the semiconductor operations of Digital Equipment Corp. I don't recall if that was before or after Compaq swallowed DEC or not. I'm honestly not sure if Intel pays royalties to ARM Holdings (it's a public company, ticker ARMHY) for use of the ARM cores on StrongARM and XScale or not. Intel, being Intel, and DEC being what it once was, may have had an unusual exclusive relationship with ARM.

    13. Re:ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a beowulf ARM?

      Or an ARM beowulf?

  12. is it just me or.... by agilen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is this a terribly written article?

    "The intention is to make it easy for manufacturers to create SmartPhones easily."

    "The key difference with TI's and Intel's respective plans is that both call for producing phones that run Microsoft's operating system software."

    huh?

  13. Re:VA is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BAH! Pox on me! Forget to tick the post anonymously box! There goes my karma.

    -Commienst (anon so I do not lose karma for offtopicness)

  14. Just wondering... by CptNoSkill · · Score: 1

    Where does linux fit in to all this? I know of a few projets to port linux to the ARM platform, but what about the IT one? What *nix based/IT based handhelds are out there, or are being worked on?

    1. Re:Just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does linux fit in to all this? I know of a few projets to port linux to the ARM platform, but what about the IT one? What *nix based/IT based handhelds are out there, or are being worked on?

      What is the obsession here with making Linux fit into everything? Use the right tool for the job - and Linux is not always the right tool. If it works out that it is a good OS for a cellphone/pda, then fine. If not, then don't force it just for the sake of running Linux on yet another platform.

      Posting anonymously to preserve my karma - yes, it's because I'm vain.

    2. Re:Just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so vain. You probably think this post is directed at you.

  15. OMAP explained... by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Not!! Sorry, but is it just me who would like arcane acronyms defined once and a while. This one wasn't even on everything2.com

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

    1. Re:OMAP explained... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh My, A Pie!

      It's the name of their chip.

    2. Re:OMAP explained... by _Stryker · · Score: 2, Informative
      Is searching for it on Google really that hard?

      I'll save you the trouble and place a direct link to the OMAP page at TI.

    3. Re:OMAP explained... by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 1

      And yet you still haven't defined what OMAP is. I searched google and found the same "informative" site you posted. Yet no definition of the acronym. WTF? I'm serious. Thanks in advance.

      --

      nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

    4. Re:OMAP explained... by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      OMAP used to stand for "Open Multimedia Applications Platform" but from talking to someone at TI that works with OMAP they decided to drop the acronym and simply call it OMAP. So, now, OMAP doesn't actually stand for anything, it is just the name for the platform defined in the link I posted.

      Hope this helps.

  16. Good Thing by D_Fresh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Anything that challenges Intel's processor hegemony in emergent platform markets is fine with me. Not because I hate Intel, but because tying the future of any industry's hardware to a single vendor is just asking for trouble. Monopoly or not, excessive dependence on a single architecture smacks of too many eggs in one basket, which ends up giving the suppliers greater control than the customers over the capabilities and cost of the units. Any biologist can tell you that host diversity goes a long way toward stopping epidemics that threaten to wipe out the whole species.

    Perhaps the fabrication of these PDA chips will be a good toehold for the next Intel of the chip industry, since it's too hard to break into the current desktop market with the complexity of those chips.

    --

    Was that out loud?
  17. Other OMAP-related products by EricKrout.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    Other OMAP-related products:

    MICROSOFT AND TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INTRODUCE WINDOWS-POWERED SMARTPHONE 2002 AND OMAP(TM) REFERENCE DESIGN

    New 2.5G Reference Design Combines Strengths of Smartphone 2002 Software and TI's OMAP Processors to Enable Rich Voice and Data-Capable Phones in Small, Sleek Form Factor


    You can read the full article at http://focus.ti.com/docs/pr/pressrelease.jhtml?pre lId=sc02025.

    I also suspect that many other products will begin to appear similar to this new Jornada and SmartPhone. You can probably sign-up to be notified on ti.com (Texas Instruments' website).

    EricKrout.com :: A Weblog On Crack (updated daily)

  18. pictures... by zome · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who are not so lucky to get there quick enough, go here to see pics and screenshots.

    If I have to choose between HP and Treo, I would prefer Treo. It's smaller and I want a phone that can be PDA. This HP is PDA that has phone feature. but for someone who paln to do a lot of wireless web browser, HP beats treo to the ground.

  19. OMAP not just for Windows CE by Glock27 · · Score: 2
    From the "features and benefits of OMAP" PDF document, OMAP (an ARM based processor with DSP functionality) has good OS/language support:

    "Supports leading mobile operating systems such as Windows CE, Symbian OS, Palm OS and Linux."

    also

    "Use high-level programming languages such as C/C++, Java etc."

    Mmmmm, another nice mobile Java platform. =)

    299,792,458 m/s...not just a good idea, its the law!

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  20. Re:frist ps0t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. Within the bowels (ahem) of Texas Instruments. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    Somehow I could never imagine this completely bizarre development happening at Intel, although I could be wrong. Anyway, TI is, by many reports, a pretty messed up place.

  22. infoSync has a better picture by Raetsel · · Score: 4, Informative

    infoSync's article has a much better picture of the Jornada 928 than the token thumbnail Forbes provides.

    They also have an article about what has been added to WinCE (guess I know why MS calls it PocketPC now...) to turn it into a mobile phone-integrated PDA. There are six (!) pages of screen shots in that one. You can also look forward to "...Mobile Information Server (MIS) 2002 Enterprise Edition, which adds Server ActiveSync..." -- here's ANOTHER pie MS wants to sell you pieces of.

    The interesting thing is that ringtones -- which phone companies want to charge you for -- aren't there. Instead, you can assign .WAV files as ring tones, and specific files for specific callers. Wonder what the motivation for that move is...?

    Still... I want one!

    --

    "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
  23. They already do... it's called Embedded XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already do... it's called Embedded XP

  24. Linux runs on it by Mechanik · · Score: 1

    Where does linux fit in to all this?

    Let the karma whoring commence! :-)

    They already have Linux running on these, on both the ARM and the C55x DSP cores that comprise the OMAP chip. They even share the same process space, so you can initiate/control/kill processes on the DSP from the ARM. This is being done by a third party company called RidgeRun Unfortunately, the OMAP version is not quite out yet it seems, but they have versions out for ARM + C54x DSP.

    Read this PDF for more technical info.

    Compilers are gcc in the case of the ARM, and the TI proprietary compiler for the DSP (ported to Linux). Debugger in both cases is GDB.

    Mechanik

    Disclaimer: I am a TI employee.

  25. Intel's territory? by tiomapengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, I do work for TI.

    >> TI has officially invaded Intel's territory, having landed its OMAP chip in HP's Jornada 928.

    I would hardly call the cell phone and handheld market "Intel's territory." The cell phone market already dominated by TI (60%+ market share), while Motorola has a much stronger presence in the handheld market with its Dragonball processor. In fact, TI has signed up 9 out the top 10 cell phone manufacturers to use its OMAP platform.

    1. Re:Intel's territory? by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Maybe the post should have been a little clearer, but I took "Intel's territory" to mean PocketPC-based devices. Nearly every PocketPC-based device in its current incarnation uses an Intel StrongARM chip (including the current Jornada).

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  26. Funny you should mention that by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    Both of the chips mentioned (Intel's XScale and TI's OMAP) are built on the ARM core.

    Go ARM!

  27. Nokia Working with TI by boio · · Score: 1
    A little more interesting is that TI is working with Nokia to counter Microsoft's entry into the cell phone market. They're working on a standard that will be available to their competitors. Article here. Microsoft is working with TI and Intel too (that article is named Microsoft brings wireless to Windows, I think it should be more like Microsoft tries to toss Windows on Wireless... Who do you want to hang up on today?)

    Too bad nobody seems to be taking any open source based options for cell phones...

  28. 2.5 G! by MosesJones · · Score: 2


    So that means its got a life expectancy of around 12 months everywhere else but the US. Add in time to manufacture and get running and this really is a bizarre agreement. Its like signing an agreement for 56k modems as everyone else moves to DSL.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  29. Economic Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When an engineer uses "efficiency", it means getting the most output for the least input -- a good thing because it tends to conserve finite natural resources. [1] But when an economist uses "efficiency", it means "efficient distribution" -- a bad thing because it tends to deplete natural resources (all economic activity wastes finite energy stocks). Economic efficiency means the "correct people" (those who can afford it) get the "correct goods and services" (whatever they want; technically known as "Pareto Optimality", which incidentally, doesn't exist). Economic efficiency rewards people who are the most successful at converting natural resources into industrial garbage ... so they can invest in even more conversion of natural resources into industrial garbage.

    If one can think like an engineer (social scientists will have difficulty doing this), one can deduce from first principles, history, and observation that a society based on "economic efficiency" will crash and dieoff. Here's how:

    1). Visit the astronomy department at your local university and verify that Earth is indeed spherical. All spheres are finite, thus Earth is finite. Therefore, you can deduce that Earth's energy resources are finite too -- finite "energy stocks" (e.g., oil) and finite "energy flows" (e.g., wind).

    2). Visit the physics department and verify that: Energy is the capacity to do work (no energy = no work). Thus, the global economy is 100 percent dependent on energy -- it always has been, and it always will be. There are NO exceptions to the laws of thermodynamics.

    The First Law of thermodynamics tells us that neither capital nor labor nor technology can "create" energy. Instead, available energy must be spent to transform existing energy stocks, or to divert an existing energy flow into more available energy.

    The Second Law of thermodynamics tells us that energy is wasted at every step in the economic process. The engines that actually do the work in our economy (so-called "heat engines", such as diesel engines) waste more than 50 percent of the energy contained in their fuel.

    Energy resources must produce more energy than they consume, otherwise they are called "sinks" (this is known as the "net energy" principle). About 735 joules of energy are required to lift 15 kg of oil 5 meters out of the ground just to overcome gravity -- and the higher the lift, the greater the energy requirements. The most concentrated and most accessible oil is produced first; thereafter, more and more energy is required to find and produce oil. At some point, more energy is spent finding and producing oil than the energy recovered -- and the "resource" has become a "sink".

    3). Visit the ecology (or population biology) department and verify that "overshoot", "crash", and "dieoff" are common in nature. Dieoff occurs when animals run out of energy stocks (food). H. sapiens are running out of energy stocks (fossil fuel first, and then food).

    Now that you have deduced the dieoff scenario from the science, turn on your TV set and observe that "dieoff" is already underway in Russia and Africa.
    The only remaining question is when will "dieoff" come to a location near you? Many industry experts expect it in less than ten years. Some say it is here already.

  30. The actual winner in this race! by krazyninja · · Score: 1
    The actual winner in this market is, ofcourse ARM. And with this, the era of having a processor core/architecture as IP has arrived. With good development tools, and power and MHz, ARM has a good roadmap ahead. I wonder what happened to the competing MIPS core.

    --
    "Do something man. Right now."