Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Viral Software Recommendations?

Kris_J asks: "My InoculateIT Personal Edition anti-virus scanner will no longer be updated from around mid-March. I've really enjoyed this package, particularly the price (it's free for personal use). The company is complaining that so many new ways are being found for virii/worms/trojans to spread that they can't afford to keep the personal edition updated. Whatever. Does anyone have a recommendation for either a particular anti-virus package/bundle, or a good place for trusted, independant, reviews of anti-virus software, or even products to avoid. (If Zonealarm Pro was bundled with an anti-virus option I'd just get that.)" For those of you who have to deal with operating systems where viruses are a problem, what software do you use to detect them and weed them out? How about software that will scan your entire network?

18 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. I don't use windows, but by leviramsey · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have heard ver nice things about GriSoft.

    1. Re:I don't use windows, but by pmsr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could it be it uses imperial, not metric measures? Two pounds of UDP packets, one pound of icmp unreachable packets ... you get the idea.

      /Pedro

  2. Re:AVGuard by boopus · · Score: 2

    Because if the Windows machine is behind a NATing firwall, it isn't possible to access any services from the outside without specificaly configuring them.

    IE/Outlook viruses still have a fair chance of course.

  3. Re:Who needs anti-viral software? by larien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, there have been cases where e.g. cover disks for magazines have been infected with virii, as well as some other disks. Even if you only open 'trusted' attachments, you can still get hit. Also, some viruses have been able to launch themselves despite not being explicitly opened in some cases.

  4. Norton Internet Security 2002 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a great product. It includes Norton's AntiVirus product (much better than McAfee, in my experience), as well as their 'software' firewall product (based on AtGuard). It also can block web ads in your browser. Very nice product, lots of features, and well worth the price.

    1. Re:Norton Internet Security 2002 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      Probably only a problem with the perl _compiler_ - if you just want to use ActiveState perl, that doesn't happen - I should now, cuz I have ActiveState perl on the same Win2k box I use NIS on, and I've never had a problem.

  5. AV solutions by ReluctantBadger · · Score: 2, Informative

    At work, we use Sophos for Windows 2000 and 98 workstations. Antigen for Exchange 2000 (which utilises McAfee & Sophos engines in our config, but there are more). Norton with wrapper for Mailsweeper. Personally, I use Sophos on my Win2k workstation. It is constantly updated, and the support from Sophos is great. Plus it's a UK company ;) so I'm biased!

    1. Re:AV solutions by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

      Antigen is GREAT. A lot of people haven't heard of it, but they should. It beats every other Exchange anti-virus tool, hands down.

      We had a lot of problems with GroupShield at work and just went to Antigen. So much better. Everywhere I've deployed GroupShield there has been problems. The general answer in their KB is REINSTALL! Which is not a good thing on a production mail server.

  6. Mcafee or Panda by troels · · Score: 2, Informative

    Im personally using Mcafee, mainly because i have good experiences with it from work where we have it running both on all windows clients and linux file servers. And if you aren't behind a "real" firewall it does come with McAfee firewall included, which i haven't actually tried myself. I think there is a trial version but im not sure. And if you like all kinds of other crap^H^H^H^Hutilities then you can get it from McAfee as well.

    An alternative i have heard some good things about though is Panda antivirus. One of the good things is that you can get an evalution version so you can try it before shelling out the money.

    Another one i haven't seen mentioned on here, and that i actually own but havent tried (came with my motherboard) is PC-cillin. This one allows you to download an evaluation version as well.

    I could mention a few others, but they have already been mentioned by others... (Norton antivirus for instance)

  7. I do use windows and by techstar25 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recommend Grisoft's AVG. It's doesn't seem to slow my XP at all. In comparison I installed Norton and my machine slowed to a crawl. It checks all email and can be intergrated into the shell making it very easy to scan files. I download sharware and other programs a lot so I need to scan them. You can download updates regularly also. I has so far found a couple infected files and let me delete them safely.

  8. Re:Norton Antivirus Coperate Edition by Llama+Keeper · · Score: 2

    Norton Corporate also works well in the stand alone mode as well. I send a copy home with all my Physicians at home. The licensing is pretty flexible and its quite cheap. I also like the fact that Norton Corporate can be set to check for update automagically. It is absolutly the best product for business applications or personal use.

    --


    Rule of Life Number 2: Remember, it can all go to hell at any minute. --Jimmy Buffet
  9. I use McAfee by Eigenray · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unfortunately, I can't tell you what I think of it.
    Uh oh, by telling you I use it you might assume that I think it's great, so let me tell you right now that may or may not be the case.

  10. False Alarms by Detritus · · Score: 2

    I've had annoying problems with McAfee "finding" viruses in files that contain digitized data from scientific experiments. Plus, it seems to be somewhat buggy, crashing when it gets confused.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  11. You *need* a server side virus scanner by Nailer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Scanning for and removing mail viruses should be handled by your mail gateway (as well as your desktops for the following reasons).
    1) This way viruses are removed from your network at first opportunity
    2) You can bounce messages and let the sender / recipient / admin know the sender has a potential virus problem
    3) One server is easier to maintain than a few hundred desktops
    3) 2 layers provide more protection than one
    4) Why waste resources getting virus laden enail to desktops? A mail gateway provides a convenient choke point to get this stuff out of your network ASAP.

    With that in mind here's a guide I wrote for my employer for doing so at clients, using Red Hat Linux, Postfix, and Sophos MailMonitor.

    In the setup outlined below,
    1) Postfix accepts incoming mails on port 25 and leads them to a content_filter.
    2) The content_filter is Sophos MailMonitor, which takes over the mails on port 10025. After the mails have been scanned, they are placed back to postfix on port 10026.
    3) Finally postfix delivers the mails.

    Anyway, you should be able to read the guide at my rather unfinished website in a short while. If it isn't there yet, it will be soon.

    1. Re:You *need* a server side virus scanner by Nailer · · Score: 2

      Me>> Scanning for and removing mail viruses should be handled by your mail gateway (as well as your desktops for the following reasons).

      But what about other ways for virii to enter the network? Not everything comes in via POP/SMTP.

      Yes. That's why I just said that :).

  12. Re:Norton Antivirus Coperate Edition by Sabriel · · Score: 2
    Norton Corporate also works well in the stand alone mode as well. I send a copy home with all my Physicians at home.
    My school has NAV Corporate 7. The standalone version has no email support for anything that isn't Outlook (or Lotus, I think). "Hi, an email with a virus has arrived, I'll just lock your inbox file while the client is still trying to save other incoming emails to it". ARGH!

    NAV Personal 2002 however parses emails before they reach the client program; very nicely done. I wish Norton had included their Personal edition instead of the sucky standalone version of their Corporate edition.

  13. Re:Who needs anti-viral software? by larien · · Score: 2
    Hehe, I remember when we eventually got our AV installations done when I worked at a university. 90% of the machines were infected (mostly with Ethan), some with 2 viruses!

    Of course, we were running in a fairly unregulated environment with internet access and floppies/zip drives/CD-Rs being rampant. Once we got the virus scanners in place, we managed to get a handle on it, but it shows how much you need anti-virus software in almost any organisation.

  14. Re:Norton is Aggravating (most anti-virus are) by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    Thanks everyone. In the end I paid US$9.95 and "upgraded" to the commerical replacement.

    BTW: I like Sophos too, but a personal licence is around A$295.