Slashdot Mirror


WIPO Music Control Treaty Ratified

Greyfox writes: "Here's one that slipped through the cracks. The WIPO (You know, that unelected, unaccountable organization that lives in the Corporate back pockets) has ratified a anti-music piracy treaty which will go into effect on May 20. It apparently has anti-circumvention measures similar to the DMCA and will carry the force of law in the USA and other member countries." We had a more informative story about these two treaties a few months ago. The only new information is that the Phonograms and Performances Treaty now has enough signatures to go into effect in May.

4 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. The Truth about WIPO by Hal_9000@!!!@ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (You know, that unelected, unaccountable organization that lives in the Corporate back pockets)
    WIPO is a treaty. If one of the 177 countries is unhappy about being part of the WIPO treaty, they can leave. So the fact that a country is part of WIPO is indicitive of the will of the lawmaking body of the country. Furthermore, the treaty had to be ratified by each country, so it was elected. And to say that it lives in corporate back pockets indicates that you don't know much about WIPO. While it has capitalist goals, it is by no means controled by any company in any country.

    --
    My email is real.
  2. That's what your government wants you to believe by October_30th · · Score: 5, Insightful
    unhappy about being part of the WIPO treaty, they can leave

    Are you trolling?

    This treaty has been SHOVED down the throats of the "177 countries" by threats of catastrophic loss of trade agreements and obscene tolls by the USA. It's a "you're either with out entertainment industry or you're against us" treaty.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  3. WIPO got it's eyes on the prize by danspalding · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because the treaty was ratified by 177 countries doesn't mean it was democratic. After all, what does the US do if we don't like other countries' policies? We strongarm investors to suck all their capital out of the country until they do what we tell them to. And if they go along with our policies, we reward them (or at least their corrupt leaders) with massive loans from the World Bank or IMF.

    The point is that these policies are getting more universal and more severe. Take a look at the article last week about the Chinese government's firewall built by eager US corporations. We're getting to the point where the internet no longer guarantees that information will be free (like speech or beer).

    Between laws enforcing intellectual property, technology that can monitor and censor internet traffic, and governments cracking down on terrorism and digital theft, we risk losing the promise of the internet.

    International treaties like this one are as important to the slashdot community as anything Bill Gates or George Bush does.

    (Now we just have to find effective ways to fight back)

    --
    Teaching, coding, coffee, revolution.
  4. Region codes for music would be an atrocity by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's bad enough that there are some great foreign films that will be probably never viewed in the United States because they are a different region (which negates travelling and legally buying the DVD and brining it back) and distributors do not consider the films worthy enough to port over to region 1. But to think that one day people might be denied exposure to music from the world's many cultures for the same reason is barbaric.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!