Slashdot Mirror


ICANN CEO Proposes Radical Changes

Froomkin writes: "ICANN CEO Stuart Lynn today released a plan for a "strong" ICANN that would have 5 of 15 Board members selected directly by governments and the rest by registrars, registries, plus a few Board-squatter-like ringers chosen by the ICANN Board or staff. The main justifications offered for this shift are that in order to be "strong" ICANN needs more money, more support, and less "process". Of course, promises Lynn, ICANN's "core values of openness and broad participation" should be "preserved". (Don't laugh. It's not funny.) "Meaningful participation" will be achieved by cutting out any direct representation for end-users. Oh yes, ICANN wants a much bigger budget, and to be independent of the US Dept. of Commerce, and to get direct control of the root server operators too, all so as to ensure that ICANN has unimpeded ability to execute its (undefined, growing) "mission". ICANN was supposed to save the Internet from governments; since major interest groups such as the ccTLDs and RIRs won't do what ICANN wants, and won't pay it, ICANN now turns to governments to save it from the Internet. See the Press Release here, and then look at entire plan, then visit ICANNWatch.org for updates and commentary." Yep. The proposal would eliminate any pretense of At-Large involvement in running ICANN - it would be solely a governmental and corporate body.

9 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. not a big deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sort of thing would only cause me concern if I felt that governments and corporations didn't have my best interest and whole-heartedly good intentions in mind.

    1. Re:not a big deal! by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 4, Funny



      If that's not flambait, then I'm a giant purple penguin that can, for some reason, use a computer.

  2. In related news, ICANN changes its name... by Lendrick · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to UCANT.

    (Universal Controller of All Network Traffic)

  3. oh many happy returns by twitter · · Score: 3, Funny
    Though many in the traditional Internet community react strongly against the very mention of governments, it is simply unrealistic to believe that global coordination of the DNS can succeed without more active involvement of governments. Indeed, it has been for decades a bedrock principle of the Internet that technical managers should stick to what they know and do best, and leave to other organizations what they in turn do best.

    The great benevolence of govenments such as China should serve as a shining model and example of plans like this. Who knows, the Chinese government may be able to bring down it's great wall, even Saudi Arabia as ICANT makes the internet safe for all good corporate citezens. What a glorious day this is for public networks and the independence of the North American Directorate. Can you feel the goodwill coming in from WIPPO, and DCMA? Every state will have it's say as the national borders go up in the name of unity. Intelectual property will be safe as will the big pubishers will no longer fear competition. Telcos can loose their fears of loosing their franchises as new more centralized and stronger means of information interchange are devised by ICANTs board members like Microsoft and Sun. The freedom this will bring is unbelievable. Like an advert flier says, there's no limit to the internet is there? Only strong government control will be able to squash the emergent wireless internet, they had better hurry!

    Oh well, I did not expect more. As the people of the United States accept violations of the first and fourth amendments, the experiment that was the Bill of Rights dies. It started with regulation of the airwaves. It will end with electronic publishing. As all the dead tree acid paper rots and people are taught that obsolete communications methods are not to be trusted and the ideas contained in those rotting pages are no longer valid, and all electronic publishing comes under the control of the government and two or three large companies.

    Bill Gates really can see the future. He's buying it.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  4. Re:Oh come on Stuart, you know the real solution by kimba · · Score: 2, Funny

    What would happen to Montserrat?

  5. In other news... by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists report a massive change in the Earth's orbit. This change has been traced to the gyroscopic effect of Jon Postel spinning in his grave.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  6. This just in by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stuart Lynn, CEO of ICANN, announced today that the board has appointed a new member - Mr William Gates. Lynn said: "Mr Gates will help ICANN function as a strong organisation, dedicated to core values and open participation".

    Mr Lynn also announced that the Internet will now be officially renamed .NET and all domain names which do not include ".msn" will be banned.

    Jon Katz, infamous /. reporter, asked whether "all our domains are belong to Microsoft?" which Mr Lynn dismissed by stating: "You are either with us or against us".

    --
    * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  7. What ICANN *really* means... by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 5, Funny
    A while ago somebody at work asked me, "What does ICANN stand for?"

    I had one of those annoying on-the-tip-of-my-tongue experiences, but I felt like I had to say something. So I stammered and blurted out:

    "the...International Conspiracy to Assign Network Names!"
    Unfortunately, that expansion is now stuck in my head.
  8. Re:Eyes Glaze Over -- and Bad Writing has its Purp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Because what people can't understand, they can't criticize."

    You, sir, are apparently not from the United States.