Underclocking for a Quiet Machine?

Posted by Cliff on Tuesday February 26, 2002 @10:21AM from the one-of-the-holy-grails-of-home-computing dept.

The Fun Guy writes "I'm running a PIII 600MHz, which I'm thinking of upgrading. If I could get rid of the fan and run more quietly, I'd love to. I run office-type apps, so I don't need the fastest processor around, but I also run d.net, so I'm constantly pegged at 100% usage. Aside from the obvious fact that your CPU is running slower than the listed speed, is there any downside to buying, say, a 1.8GHz chip and running it at 900MHz without the fan? Any experience or FAQ's to share on this?" We've covered this topic several times before, with some good feedback, however most of the approaches don't discuss the use of underclocking to accomplish this, although one common suggestion from the comments is to use a non-Intel processor, if you can. Have any of you tried underclocking your CPU to allow it to run silently? How far do you need to underclock a processor in order to enable it to run without a fan?

2 of 62 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

here's a whole line... by Anonymous Coward · 2002-02-26 10:22 · Score: -1, Troll

A Berlin-based company, Leichmann-Dietzer Ltd., specializes in quiet PCs and components. Cases, fans, mobos, procs, etc. Check them out.
Note to self: by Anonymous Coward · 2002-02-26 11:23 · Score: -1, Troll

Eat a BAG OF HELL 'fun guy'
Maybe if you weren't pegging the system with bloated, useless cycle-wasters such as DNET, you would have a quieter system. You stupid back-porch withered john-apple. Dirty GNU/Pillock.