Slashdot Mirror


Domain Name Dispute Process Called Into Question

Chemist109 writes "The Register has an article about a study of the domain name dispute resolution process. The study accuses domain arbitrators of "actively choosing judges who favoured complainants (trademark holders)." Since the complainant in a domain dispute is allowed to choose where a case is heard, this ensures the arbitrators continued revenue."

3 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. As my mother is always telling me ... by Account+10 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... life isn't fair.

  2. Title? by Lethyos · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Domain Name Dispute Process Called Into Question

    I was under the impression that this dispute has been ongoing for quite a long while. The whole process is inherently flawed and geared to please corporations (how many domains held by individuals have been seized by corporations?) and is a matter of controversy. Silly /. journalism! I thought this site was about news. :)

    --
    Why bother.
  3. Please explain Anonymous Coward by Garry+Anderson · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Please explain why the solution is wrong - if you can.

    As to being a raving nut - my logic is reasoned and rational - please explain what is not - if you can.

    How can a post to these threads be spam - if it is on topic?

    The fact that you have not seen the solution before, bares witness to the fact it needs repeating - does it not?

    If you do not answer these points, then you clearly are a coward - no wonder you wish to remain anonymous ;-)