Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Domain Name Dispute Process Called Into Question

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the is-anyone-shocked-by-this? dept.

Chemist109 writes "The Register has an article about a study of the domain name dispute resolution process. The study accuses domain arbitrators of "actively choosing judges who favoured complainants (trademark holders)." Since the complainant in a domain dispute is allowed to choose where a case is heard, this ensures the arbitrators continued revenue."

5 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. grammar??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    "situation has got worse"
    what a moron

  2. As my mother is always telling me ... by Account+10 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... life isn't fair.

  3. Title? by Lethyos · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Domain Name Dispute Process Called Into Question

    I was under the impression that this dispute has been ongoing for quite a long while. The whole process is inherently flawed and geared to please corporations (how many domains held by individuals have been seized by corporations?) and is a matter of controversy. Silly /. journalism! I thought this site was about news. :)

    --
    Why bother.
  4. Hold on a sec... by JatTDB · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    So.

    "Scrotor"

    *giggle*

    What kind of crack were you smoking when you came up with that name for a business? Sounds like a fucking villain in Orgazmo.

    And I wonder...this statement: "Posting anonymously, because I don't want to reveal my name nor the name of my company."...so...is Scrotor not really the name of your company? Maybe there's help for you yet...

    --
    "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
  5. Please explain Anonymous Coward by Garry+Anderson · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Please explain why the solution is wrong - if you can.

    As to being a raving nut - my logic is reasoned and rational - please explain what is not - if you can.

    How can a post to these threads be spam - if it is on topic?

    The fact that you have not seen the solution before, bares witness to the fact it needs repeating - does it not?

    If you do not answer these points, then you clearly are a coward - no wonder you wish to remain anonymous ;-)