Slashdot Mirror


Patent Nonsense

ziriyab writes: "This article from The Guardian, after a few paragraphs of corporation bashing, gives an interesting history of two countries (Switzerland and the Netherlands) who flourished without IP laws. The article, while not necessarily suggesting that the abandonment of patent protection is an essential precondition for development, seems to indicate that it can, in the right circumstances, be an effective tool."

2 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. The corporation bashing isn't COMPLETE nonsense by ragmana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't skip those first few paragraphs. While there is a bit of a bias, the article talks about the sale of cheap medicines to third world countries. It's true that large, highly profitable companies are outpricing these nations on things they need.

    When will some people recognize that some rights - like food and medicine, i.e., basic health and survival - trump capitalism, intellectual property, and other protections which are fine to call "rights" in prosperous nations but do not deserve that designation in the Third World?

  2. Two Types Of Invention? by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps there are two types of invention: Those that will occur without protection, and those that won't occur without it.

    Obviously, not having protection won't hinder all invention, as the "inventive spirit" is something that most of us believe exists.

    Also, while there may have been invention during that time, there was probably also more trade secrecy, something the article doesn't explore at all.

    If the patent process slows business, it may actually be because it requires disclosure. Companies go for the "sure thing" by patenting, but give up the possibility of perpetuating their monopoly through secrecy which can be *very* effective. Thinking Coca-Cola? Chump change. Consider Ziljan (the cymbal people) IIRC, they kept the process a family secret for something like 400 years or more. If all the Ziljans get hit by a bus, nobody will ever be able to make those exact cymbals again. So, what was that about patents being bad for society?

    Of course this is all just speculation and stuff. Nobody has the time to do an unbiansed, rigorous, statisticly valid study and present it in such a way so that laymen could understand it. That would be... a lot of work!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?