Slashdot Mirror


Where Music Will Come From

em.a18 writes "There is a good article in the NYTimes about how we use music and how it changes after Napster. The article even suggests some good business models. Nicely done!" Yeah you need a free registration to read it, but it's a good piece. I like the quote 'With digitization, music went from being a noun, to a verb, once again. '

2 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Abuser galore by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    If the Times provides these pages (which, by the way, are loaded with ads to subscribe to the Times) without registration, what is the problem with accessing them?

    How is loading a publicly-available webpage "cheating?" Especially when people have quite legitimate issues about spreading their personal info around -- we all have to make our own choices about what justifies revealing ourselves.

    Note: I've been registered with NYT for several years.

  2. Re:Abuser galore by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I am not harming any companies by exercising my right to free information on the Internet.

    A little bit of trolling is like a little bit of spice. When the spice takes over the dish, it's too much.

    On the off-chance that you may not be troling, however...why would you have a "right to free content on the Internet," but not have a "right to free apples from the orchard by the highway?"

    Just like an apple taken by you could be sold to another (thus depriving a farmer of income), the bandwidth you use could be provided to a "paying customer." What intrinsic difference are you talking about in these two exchanges?

    (To moderators: Before hitting that "off-topic" checkbox, consider the same principles applied to this gentleman's "right to free music on the Internet.")