Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

IBM 120GXP Revisited

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the spin-up-spin-down-repeat-until-dead dept.

Andrew sent us a link to an article about the IBM 120gxp controversy. This is about the fact that the drive has been declared unfit for server use, and to back that up, IBM says you should only use it for 333 hours a month. This is a good summary of the issues and worth a read.

5 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. You know when an article is good... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...when it manages a reference to Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy as an explanatory allegory. That's cool.

    Beware of the Leopard.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  2. This is sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Funny

    How will people use their 1,000 free hours of AOL in 45 days if their hard drive, and hence their PC, can only be on 333 hours per month?

  3. Unionized drives? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only 8 hours a day? Next thing you know the drives will be demanding 15 minute coffee breaks twice a day, full medical and dental, three weeks vacation each year, job security, and so on.

    -me

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  4. Re:8 hours a day? Please... by Zarquon · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm rather pissed off at this since I brought one of these drives a few weeks ago and it's running my desktop machine, which is on 25/7... it's OK so far but it would be a pain if it dies, but since /home/ is NFS mounted it wouldn't be the end of the world.


    Cool.. I always wanted to go to a planet with a longer rotational period. Can I come visit?
    --
    "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
  5. Pixie dust my ass by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess that pixie dust IBM uses isn't so magical after all.