theKompany's Shawn Gordon On The GPL
replicant_deckard writes "In this short but insightful essay Shawn Gordon, the founder of theKompany, explains why GPL doesn't work for software companies producing graphical and end-user friendly stuff. This reminds us that GPL has so far been useful just for infrastructure-level hacker stuff like operating systems, databases etc. " Of course, it's been used for end user - OpenOffice, GAIM, and other projects.
But i can't resist the temptation for a first post!
Don't trust him! He's the DEVIL!
Holla at dem bitchez!
Al you bitchez ready for some spring break akshun? Ill bring the GHB!!!!
Holla Back.
My penis is long and stout
If you're a man, you can try it out.
I don't like girls.
Not their tits,
Nor their curls.
I'm a Slashdot kind of guy.
Come close and lick t.
Bend over and I'll stick it.
Where the sun don't shine.
I'm a Slashdot kind of guy.
Call me a fairy.
My balls they are hairy.
Sniff them with your snout.
My penis is long and stout.
I'm a Slashdot kind of guy.
Ohhhhh YOU FUNNY MAN!!! Haw haw haw. At least it wasn't a GOATSE.CX link.
Gotta love that slashdot quality.
Furry cows moo and decompress.
There's only one possible explanation between the continued jabbing back and forth between the KDE and GNOME camps.
Two words.
"Sexual tension".
--------
Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...
The people who choose the GPL for their software do so because they don't care about making money but they don't want anyone else to make money
Almost. You just need to add from software sales on the end.
GPL'd software makes plenty of money for distributors, consultants, and businesses that run servers.
A lot of people fail to make the distinction. What if there were a strong GPL community for music? Then musicians would allow the RIAA to distribute without ever signing them, and they wouldn't allow other musicians to cover their tunes under contract.
I get a real kick out of people who whine about the RIAA's contracts, but think IBM using Linux is great for programmers.
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?