Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Uses DMCA to Delist Critic's Website

touretzky writes: "Scientology has used a DMCA threat to force removal of a large number of pages from xenu.net from the Google search engine. Some of the pages Scientology is objecting to contain no material owned by the cult; other pages are clearly covered under "fair use". Scientology's ongoing abuse of Google is documented here. Of course, the Norwegian owner of xenu.net could write a counternotification letter, but that would require him to agree to the jurisdiction of a US court in a district of Scientology's choosing." The posting by Heldal-Lund agrees with what we can observe at Google - the pages listed in the posting aren't in Google's database, though many others are. Update: 03/21 14:16 GMT by M : Paul Wouters of xtdnet.nl (which hosts xenu.net) submits this page documenting Scientology's attacks against the ISP for continuing to host xenu.net.

25 of 576 comments (clear)

  1. Aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Scientologists banned from Germany as they are considered a non-serious organisation, or something similar?

    And, then how does Germany act upon Google and stuff?

  2. xenu.net usenet thread about being de-listed by SweenyTod · · Score: 5, Informative

    Andreas, xenu.net's owner announced all this on the usenet group alt.religion.scientology. You can read his posting here on google (hah!), where he talks about it, and what URLs were de-listed.

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
  3. Great! by BlackGriffen · · Score: 5, Informative
    Now the DMCA is being abused by a bunch of religious wackos! The worst part is, assuming that xenu.net is violating copyright (which I doubt), what the wackos have done is legal. Check out this paragraph from the DMCA:
    (From section 512)

    `(d) INFORMATION LOCATION TOOLS- A service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief, or, except as provided in subsection (j), for injunctive or other equitable relief, for infringement of copyright by reason of the provider referring or linking users to an online location containing infringing material or infringing activity, by using information location tools, including a directory, index, reference, pointer, or hypertext link, if the service provider--

    `(1)(A) does not have actual knowledge that the material or activity is infringing;

    `(B) in the absence of such actual knowledge, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; or

    `(C) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material;

    `(2) does not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in a case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity; and

    `(3) upon notification of claimed infringement as described in subsection (c)(3), responds expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity, except that, for purposes of this paragraph, the information described in subsection (c)(3)(A)(iii) shall be identification of the reference or link, to material or activity claimed to be infringing, that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate that reference or link.

    Pay special attention to subsection `(3). So even linking to copyright infringing material is illegal?!? wtf were those wackos who wrote this bill thinking? This is a serious freedom of speech violation (since software is, after all, speech, and links are just software written in a scripting language). The sooner that abomination of a law gets repealed, the better.

    In this instance, here's what xenu.net should do: register a new, and temporary, domain name. The scientologists will have conniptions hunting down his new domain names, he'll have to pay less than lawyer fees.

    I wonder if I should become a sci fi author and start my own relition?

    BlackGriffen

  4. Re:Clear this up please? by Misch · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm at a loss to understand how the US law has any sway in another country.

    In this case, it doesn't. It's being used against a company in the United States (Google).

    I don't think it's affecting Google in Italy, for example

    --

    --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
  5. I used to be a Scientologist by leereyno · · Score: 5, Informative
    Scientology is not a religion. Scientology is a mind control cult with the purpose of conning people out of large sums of money, enslaving them if possible, and of course world domination.

    I was a scientologist for almost eight years and worked out in LA at "Big Blue." This complex used to be the Cedars of Sinai hospital but was purchased by Hubbard and company back in the 1970's. It is where ASHO, AOLA, and the LA orgs are, as well as a good portion of OSA. They've remodeled most everything there so some things might have changed since then.

    In any case I am here to tell anyone who will listen that Scientology is evil. I don't make that kind of a claim lightly. Scientology is a cult made up of people who have ceased to think for themselves and are no longer acting in their own best interest but are instead being manipulated and coerced into living for the cult, to their own detriment. There are so many things that Scientology does that are wrong that it is difficult to know where to begin in detailing them all. Scientology is to me a weird conglomeration of Nazi-esque nonsense, corporate abuse of the public trust, and organized crime.

    Others whose words are far better than mine have already detailed the nature of Scintology's evil far better than I can at 7 am. The link below points to a website that has just about every significant book written that exposes the evil nature of scientology:

    http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/

    I applaud the owner of this site for having the courage to make a stand against one of the most evil organizations of our time.

    Lee Reynolds

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:I used to be a Scientologist by lermanet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking of dead bodies... I was rceently contacted by a lady that used to be high up in Scientology in Clearwater who had read this list of bizzare deaths at thier headquarters.

      http://www.b-org.demon.nl/scn/deaths/reports/00-su icide-reports-index.html#add She told me we only knew about the tip of the iceberg.

      All folks have to do to defeat scientology and send it to the scarp yard of history is to keep on getting the word out,

      Arnie Lerma
      Ferengi + Borg = Scientology
      I'd prefer to die speaking my mind than live fearing to speak.
      The only thing that always works in scientology are its lawyers
      The internet is the liberty tree of the new millennium
      Secrets are the mortar binding lies as bricks together into prisons for the mind
      http://www.lermanet.com- mentioned 4 January 2000 in
      The Washington Post's - 'Reliable Source' column re "Scientologist with no HEAD"
      You want Bigots? http://members.cox.net/bwarr2/Movie2.html
      --
      Ferengi + Borg = Scientology
  6. Re:What's with scientology? by ab762 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Canada, they've lost all the way to the Supreme Court - One case is Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995. It was a libel case, and the details will look pretty familiar. Holysmokehas an extract and this is the full thing. Umontreal's archive is linked from the official Supreme Court of Canada page.

    Great quote: "Every aspect of this case demonstrates the very real and persistent malice of Scientology." - from the Court itself.

    I know that there have been many other rulings in Canada against Scientology, but only this one is easily available on-line.

    Henry Troup - hwt@igs.net

  7. Speaking from Germany by kybernator · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nope, they are in no way banned here, even though two or three years ago they tried to get a lot of international media attention claiming they were opressed.
    Truth is: they lost a court case regarding exemption from taxes as a religious non-profit-organisation (I mean, c'mon, sc. and non-profit...) _and_ organisations and business firms that do training, coaching and counselling for gouvernment agencies have to sign a declaration that they are not a part of sc. and that they will not introduce scientologic philosophy and methods - this rule was introduced whe plans had leaked to take over the gouvernment by means of setting up counselling and advisory firms, introducing sc. methods in gouvernment offices and recruiting decision-makers.

  8. Re:What's with scientology? by The+Qube · · Score: 5, Informative
    A great book to read on the subject and their philosophy is "A Piece of Blue Sky" by Jon Atack.

    You can read it here.

    --

    "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

  9. Hey, Scientologists, now try Freenet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Clowns. A lot of your material is on Freenet, including the really juicy stuff that costs suckers $350,000 to look at. Go for it!

  10. Lies, damned lies, and Scientology by crath · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are two issues at hand:

    1. Is xenu.net posting copyrighted documents without permission of the copyright holder?
    2. Cults need to obscure the truth in order to deceive their prey.

    The first issue is a serious one, and in the past this has been the method which the C. of S. used to shut down critics: those critics were breaking the law by reproducing copyrighted works. The law allows for critics to quote limited amounts source material within the context of written criticism. The law does not, and should not, allow wholesale copying of other poeple's material; regardless of whether that material contains lies.

    The second issue is the real issue; however, as I've already noted, cults use the misbehaviour of their critics against them. Yes, let's put cults out of business; but let us also remember that "the end doesn't justify the means." Remember McCarthy and the mess he made while operating under and end justifies the means assumption.

  11. Re:They make enemies because they need enemies by thesolo · · Score: 5, Informative
    They believe that they are superiour beings (members claim to have gained superhuman powers by their Sc.-training). We, the non-members, are just stupid "wogs", who can be cheated, lied to, even killed at will. Hubbard actually promised his members the superhuman power of killing such enemies by mere thought.

    Exactly. Want to see how L. Ron Hubbard would deal with non-CoS members? Check out Scientology's plan for extermination. The CoS has a "tone scale", which they think everyone falls onto, and that you can predict someone's exact behavior based on where they fall on that scale. If you are a 2.0 or less on that scale, they believe you should have no civil rights at all. (Hubbard actually wrote that in one of his books, isn't that lovely?). You can read more on that scale here.

    Also, you can see a copy of Scientology Related Deaths here (thanks google cache! ha!)
  12. Most of the Scientology docs available via Freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    At the following Freenet key:

    SSK@WRhGF3h0ijFh1eVJnFu~H9OyIpAPAgM/antiscient/5//

    Now getting your Freenet node working in the first place ... that is another thing altogether! ;]

  13. Tell mroe about OSA by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    This complex used to be the Cedars of Sinai hospital but was purchased by Hubbard and company back in the 1970's. It is where ASHO, AOLA, and the LA orgs are, as well as a good portion of OSA.

    Lee, tell these folks all about the Office of Special Affairs. If ever there were a terrorist group operating on U.S. soil, OSA is it. Harassment, dirty tricks, stealing files from government offices, they've done it all.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  14. Federal law usually supercedes corporate policy. by CoreDump · · Score: 4, Informative
    I think the subject speaks for itself.

    If Google's policy is in conflict with Federal Law ( IE, the DMCA ), guess which one will be upheld?

    --

    ---
    Segmentation Fault ( core dumped )

  15. Scientology video footage on net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.lisatrust.net/Media/pickets.htm

    has some really scary or funny footage of Scientology representatives in Clearwater, Florida interfering with a peaceful picket of their headquarters following the bizarre death of one of their members, Lisa McPherson.

  16. Re:w/Google, won the battle but not the war? by Akardam · · Score: 3, Informative

    Clicking on the link above, one of the two Google Directory categories was Society > Religion and Spirituality > Opposing Views > Scientology. And, featuring promenantly on the top of that list, is Xenu.net.

    Yes, it's a teensy bit obfuscated, but the fact that just one additional click can still get you there shouldn't be ignored.

  17. Re:Scientology = America's Al Qaida by Arcturax · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is an article about their interference at ground zero.
    http://cisar.org/010919a.htm

    They also have been posing as mental health professionals:

    http://www.sptimes.com/2002/02/08/Worldandnation /S cientology_reaches_o.shtml

    or from their OWN MOUTHS here
    http://www.scientology.org/message/Scientolo gy-vol unteer-ministers.htm

    They claim to have been volunteering, but they were actually recruiting.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  18. Re:lots of techies into scientology? by Mr.Ned · · Score: 3, Informative

    Top-down was used by Christianity for a long time. When it became the official religion of the Roman empire, it was not the most practiced religion or even close - rich, powerful people had been converted (like Constantine and many of the emperors up to whoever actually made it official). When the Christians went to convert the barbarians, they'd target the leaders of the tribe (mostly because it was the leader's beliefs that dictated the beliefs of the tribe).

    But it is pretty effective.

  19. Re:Ignore the scientologists by Doctor+Nut · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only problem with that is Thats exactly what the Scientologists want! This attempt to get critical links pulled gets less attention put on the criminal dealings of Scientology. They would be more than happy to see "wogs" (non-scientologists in Hubbard-speak) ignore them completely so they can continue bilking their members for auditing fees. The problem is, they won't be ignored as long as they keep pulling lamebrained PR moves like this on. Operation Footbullet keeps rolling on!

  20. Re:Class-action Suit Against Scientology? by lermanet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well... It could be done now, if there were, perhaps 5 million dollars available to bankroll it.

    The scientology litigation machine uses litigation stress and expense to buy silence.

    see the graphicindex on lermanet.com


    arnie lerma
    ex-member Ferengi + Borg = Scientology
    I'd prefer to die speaking my mind than live fearing to speak.
    The only thing that always works in scientology are its lawyers
    The internet is the liberty tree of the new millennium
    Secrets are the mortar binding lies as bricks together into prisons for the mind
    http://www.lermanet.com- mentioned 4 January 2000 in
    The Washington Post's - 'Reliable Source' column re "Scientologist with no HEAD"
    You want Bigots? http://members.cox.net/bwarr2/Movie2.html
    --
    Ferengi + Borg = Scientology
  21. Re:Scientology = America's Al Qaida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    This was reported on xenu.net about a week after 9/11. According to the article fox news was scrolling a scientology number across the bottom of the screen as some kind of mental health hotline" for about two hours before they were notified that it was a Scientology number.

    Then, according to xenu.net, scientologists were swarming at ground zero trying to route psychologists away from the victim's family, and doing "touch assists" at the site.

    I'd link to the page at xenu.net but it seems to be down or /.ed at the moment.

    Here's (ironically for this story) the cached link on google:

  22. Never mind, found a clearinghouse by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Chris Owen exposes all.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  23. Live event in Mountain View TODAY by dmarti · · Score: 3, Informative

    We will be visiting Google's headquarters IN PERSON to search for Xenu information -- with cameras rolling.

    Who: The Mountain View, California Xenu Study Group
    (This means you)

    What: First meeting: "Finding Facts about Xenu on the Net with Google"

    Where: Meet at Dana St. Roasting Company, 744 Dana Street,
    Mountain View.
    Then, travel to Google HQ.

    When: 3:45 PM, Thursday, March 21, 2002

    Why: To make sure that accurate information about Xenu is available through Internet search engines.

    What to bring: 1. another video camera (we already have at least one, but could use some more shots)

    2. Your pen and paper for taking notes about how to find good Xenu (and Scientology) sites.

    Contact: Don Marti -- dmarti@zgp.org

  24. Re:What's with scientology? by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is why I think that "tax exempt" status for religious organizations should be eliminated. Why should the government decide what is a religion and what isn't?

    The original concept behind tax exempt status for churches was the separation of church and state idea. There's lots of things "churches" get away with, and lots of things that the state cannot do on church property (like arrest someone without the church's consent). But it also keeps the state from enforcing religious views (technically).

    There's lots and lots and LOTS of reasons why this used to be a very good idea. Like everything with good intentions, it was just a stop along the way to hell.

    Money and power have always been more important than friendship and happiness. Sadly, almost every religion is based upon the opposite.

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.