"free" but not non-profit
by
benjamindees
·
· Score: 2, Informative
This is misleading. Everyone thinks that since the service was "free", it was non-profit. Napster profitted from advertising on its website, the only place one could download the Napster client. Thus, it profitted (although indirectly) from enabling people to commit copyright infringement. Although I would adamantly defend an individual's RIGHT to do this, corporations do not have rights. They are subject to laws and punishments such as this, paltry though it is (cease and desist).
-- "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
This is misleading. Everyone thinks that since the service was "free", it was non-profit. Napster profitted from advertising on its website, the only place one could download the Napster client. Thus, it profitted (although indirectly) from enabling people to commit copyright infringement. Although I would adamantly defend an individual's RIGHT to do this, corporations do not have rights. They are subject to laws and punishments such as this, paltry though it is (cease and desist).
"I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"