Hosting Problems For distributed.net
Yoda2 writes "I've always found the distributed.net client to be a scientific, practical use for my spare CPU cycles. Unfortunately, it looks like they lost their hosting and need some help. The complete story is available on their main page but I've included a snippet with their needs below:
'Our typical bandwidth usage is 3Mb/s, and reliable uptime is of course essential.
Please e-mail dbaker@distributed.net if you think you may be able to help us in this area.'
As they are already having hosting problems, I hate to /. them, but their site is copyrighted so I didn't copy the entire story.
Please help if you can." Before there was SETI@Home, Distributed.net was around - hopefully you can still join the team.
As far as I can figure out, the only people who would be "strongly interested in cryptography" would be cryptographers, terrorists, money launderers, and purveryors of kiddie porn. Call me nuts, but unless you fall into one of those groups, I don't see why the interest (paranoia) is warranted. I agree with the first poster. My cycles go to medicine. Whether or not it's commercial, I don't care. If my cycles help to invent a cure that I have to BUY somewhere down the line, I'll gladly buy it.
The only reason you "submit" blocks is to get stats. If all the clients just did random blocks of keys you'd expect the key to be found equally as fast.
To top if off the finder of the key gets the *full* 10,000$ if they don't go thru d.net.
What incentive is there for d.net now?
Tom
Someday, I'll have a real sig.