Does Open Source Software Really Work?
reflexreaction writes "This article on NewsFactor does a decent job of covering some of the issues facing Open Source Software (OSS). It points to Linux's growth area, non-mission critical projects in mid-sized companies, and its main weakness, the desktop. It also briefly discusses Linux's potential growth into mission critical applications if scalability issues are addressed. Quick easy read. My favorite quote from the article "Linux on the desktop is toast.""
The main problem of OSS like linux for companies, I think, is that either it isn't up to date or it's not stable (enough). The latest stable linux release (potato) is really old compared to, say, win XP (i'm not saying this one is stable, but at least a lot of people THINK it is). If you want to make linux make better use of your cutting-edge-of-technology-hardware, you'll have to use the unstable release (or at the very least the testing release). I can imagine a company doesn't like to use software that is labeled 'unstable'.
In the end I think it's a matter of who do you trust more, some people who programmed an OS in their spare time, or Bill Gates. Hard decision when lot's of money relay on that software...
this sig has intentionally been left blank
Linux is programmed by the customers/users themselves.
No. Linux is programmed by geeks, for geeks. The average customer/user has neither the time nor the inclination to program it themselves.
"Information wants to be paid"
"Information wants to be paid"
...bloated system requirements...
*Cough* KDE or Gnome + Star/Open Office *Cough*
A combination which will bring a machine to its knees with constant swapfiling and slow sssllllooowwwww running.
The same machine will quite happily and quickly run Windows and Microsoft Office without any difficulty or memory issues whatsoever.
Pot. Kettle.
"Information wants to be paid"