Slashdot Mirror
gobeProductive 3.0 - Office XP killer?
Deffexor writes "It appears that gobe (that famous software company that made the invaluable "office suite" for BeOS) has unveiled their v3.0 release of gobeProductive for Windows and Linux. ArsTechnica has an excellent review of why this is such an important "office suite". While gobeProductive isn't as full-featured as OfficeXP, it certainly does garner a whole lot of Bang-for-the-Buck (especially with the FamilyLicense). The author does a great job of summarizing the superiority of gobeProductive in his conclusion when he says,"This review, which is fifteen pages of graphics and text (in the word processor), along with 5 separate sheets chock full of information, only uses 7MB of RAM while running. Microsoft Word XP (WINWORD.EXE), sitting idle with nothing open, uses 11MB of RAM."" Of course, RAM usage doesn't matter as much these days, with the standard RAM installed being above 128 megs, but still good to know. Update by RM, 8:58 US EST: Only the Windows version of gobeProductive v3.0 seems to be available at this time.
In general a pretty good program, but a little crude when compared to MS Office. We will see if it can hold up to the onslaught.
does anyone know how this compares to star office
Anyone know if this will work under the Linux emulation layer in the *BSD family? I'd love to give it a try, but my only x86 box is running OpenBSD and I doubt they'll release a LinuxPPC build so I can try it with the penguin.
--saint
You're absolutely right, but the problem is that if someone already has office, what's the incentive to switch to something that's not even 100% compatible (in Word documents, especially)?
So I use it at home, several of my office mates use it at home, and since I'm a developer and they didn't give me office on my work machine, I used it there, too - until they sent me a form to fill out in Word and I couldn't make it work with StarOffice. Now I have Office. It's not any better, but it can read 100% of the crap they send me.
Sure, I could use WordViewer, but then I couldn't fill in the form. That was the problem.
Since I only use it five minutes every two or three weeks, it was a giant waste of money, but hey - they wanted it in Word format. Whatever. They didn't even just give me word, they gave me the whole of MS Office. The model of inefficiency.
Stupid sexy Flanders.
Utterly essential that this works for communicating with the outside world.
Cheers,
Ian
I remember back when LightWave first came out for Windows. Newtek thought they would crush 3dStudio becuase of its price/features. To their amazement, sales were low. When they researched to find out why it wasn't selling, they found many companies ignored it because it wa TOO CHEAP. The old saying, "You pay for what you get" made purchasers think that if Brand X is half the price of Brand Z, there must be a reason. What did Newtek do? They raised the price by $1000 and Lightwave sales took off!
The same thing is happening today with stuff like StarOffice, GoBe, and Linux in general. People that don't know better assume that if it is cheap or free, it must be something wrong with it. Maybe the solution is to charge outrageous prices (with deep discounts for personal uses).
Why is everyone treating Office XP like it is the best thing that ever happened to office apps? It almost drove me insane. Little icons popping up all over the text - without clicking on anything, those docked dialogs appearing on both sides of the document when least needed, dynamic toolbars that never seem to stay docked... I was glad it was just a 30day trial and I re-installed Office 2000 a few days later.
:)
I really have to try some of the alternative office apps. Tried StarOffice beta on Linux. Liked it a lot.
There does not appear to be a demo version available on their website. At one level I understand that there are issues with demos that are difficult to get around. (I used WinZip and Paint Shop Pro for YEARS without registering them) But if they really want to make a dent in the Microsoft Office Monopoly they are going to have to earn the trust of the techs. There is simply no way that I will recommend to my boss that we switch away from the most popular piece of software ever without being able to play with it for at least a month. How am I going to justify buying another TOTALLY EXTRANEOUS office suite, just to test it out? Something for the Gobe guys, or any other MS competitor to ponder...
I think the whole approach to 'killing' Office by coming up with a Linux/Unix/Bewhatever office suite is wrong. These guys have the right approach. First take a big slice of the Office-on-Windows pie. Once you have this action you'll also have the cash to finance less popular versions for discriminating OS users. If this works as advertised it will take a big slice of the pie. I can't wait to see how long it takes for Billy to show up with lawyers guns and money.
Open a pdf in your web browswer and tack on another 20+ until you manually kill the acrobat task.
Ok, so i'm sure this has been discussed elsewhere, but why is this necessary. I've noticed it too and cacn't see why acrobat keeps a process running that consumes a big chunk of RAM even after I'm done looking at a PDF ion my web browswer.
"Prior to the Linux version's availability, packaging will include a coupon redeemable for a Linux version CD."
For those of us who use multiple platforms, it would be nice if their license was for any version on any platform. Any one see anything about a Mac OS/X version? An office suite that is uniform an consistient across Linux, Windows, and Mac OS/X would be useful. (I know that an Open Office port to the Mac is underway, so perhaps OO will be the solution).