Slashdot Mirror


The Root of All E-Mail

wiredog writes "A Washington Post story about the DNS, the VeriSign NOC, and some of the security therein." Especially interesting in light of the recent security lockdowns throughout much of the Western world. The havoc of losing the A root server would be bad, like Staypuft Marshmallow Man bad.

4 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. Sheesh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hemos said...

    Especially interesting in light of the recent security lockdowns throughout much of the Western world. The havoc of losing the A root server would be bad, like Staypuft Marshmallow Man bad.

    Absolute proof that the Slashdot editors don't even bother to read the articles, and just depend on their wrong understanding of things.

    From the article...

    "The DNS is built so that eight or more of the world's 13 master root servers would have to fail before ordinary Internet users started to see slowdowns, according to John Crain, manager of technical operations for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

    ICANN manages the DNS and sets policies for registry operators and domain name retailers.

    "Theoretically, if 'A' were to disappear, we could pick it up from one of the other servers," Crain said. "Moving the place where the zone is picked up is very simple."

    In other words, don't panic. The A server is just the highest profile target.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  2. Re:Next target for terrorists? by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The slashdot post is misleadingly sensationalist (I know, shocking!)

    The article states that 8 of the 13 root servers (which are located throughout the US) would have to fail simultaneously before internet users would even notice something was wrong. I think that qualifies as "a little redundancy"...

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  3. Taking down enough DNSs... not easy! by Gruturo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a world map with root-servers pointed on it, looks like the area in which the A server is (Virginia, Maryland) hosts not one but six (A, C, D, G, H and J) servers, some of which (like H, run by US Army) are probably veeery well defended...
    I found a link to the same pic on the net:
    cs.ucla.edu

    ...or maybe just nuke the whole area and you take down 6 of them

    --

    Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
  4. Re:Distributed DNS? by L-Train8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    DNS is already distributed. You're friendly neighborhood ISP caches the most often used DNS info, and 80% of internet traffic is resolved there. Only a small portion of traffic has to be escalated to a root server. That's why, as the article said, 8 of the 13 root servers would have to be taken out simultaneously for users to notice any slowdown. An attack on the A root server would be more symbolic than actually damaging. Even if it was done by the Stay-Puffed Marshmellow Man.

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.