Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

OpenOffice 641d Released, Next Stop: 1.0

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the moving-towards-office-killer dept.

Damek writes "In the spirit of the proliferating news about Office alternatives and 1.0 versions this week, OpenOffice.org has released a new version of OpenOffice, 641d, the last planned release before 1.0. They're calling for help in pinning down and eradicating final bugs before they hit the big milestone: "...we would like you to download it, test it, and finally vote on the feature set.""

9 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. but by bouis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whatever happened to porting OpenOffice to GTK? Was this ever seriously considered or did I just imagine it?

    1. Re:but by Mister+Proper · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Whatever happened to porting OpenOffice to GTK? Was this ever seriously considered or did I just imagine it?
      I've wondered about that myself too. The nice thing is that Michael Meeks talked about doing that at FOSDEM, also he has mentioned the same thing on one of the GNOME mailing lists (can't be bothered to look this up).

      Miguel de Icaza too has said that time is better spent on improving OpenOffice rather than working on say Gnumeric (which he wrote part of too).

      So, nothing concrete but who knows, maybe Michael wil work on integrating OpenOffice with GNOME some day. Another possibility is that Sun will do the integration after they switch to GNOME (perhaps they could pay Ximian to do this for them?).

      Just dreaming out loud here.

    2. Re:but by Tet · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Miguel de Icaza too has said that time is better spent on improving OpenOffice rather than working on say Gnumeric

      Which is yet another indication that Miguel has lost the plot. Gnumeric is a stunning app that could seriously rival Excel. OpenOffice isn't close to rivalling either Word or Excel any time soon. But Miguel has long ago forgotten the Unix concept of small specialized tools, and is heading towards MS bloat at an alarming pace. OpenOffice is significantly better than it used to be (and light years ahead of StarOffice 5), but it's starting out on the wrong foot, by trying to be an "office suite", rather than a set of apps that work well together with a consistent look and feel. The sad thing is that I remember Miguel from when he was working on the SPARC and MIPS ports of Linux. How the mighty have fallen...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  2. Hooray for the team! by xophos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently had to convert 100 pages of M$-Word to Latex. There was loads of mathematics in it, and Open Office helped me a great deal in seeing what the original looked like, since i don't have any M$ on my machine.

  3. heated competition by morgajel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    with the recent stories about the implications of star office being charged for, it's good to see that openoffice is setpping up to the plate.
    if I were the developers working on openoffice, I'd be thankin my lucky stars(no pun inteded) that sun decided to charge for it. with the growing wave of 'open and free is better' I think they can capitalize on it.
    As a former BeOS user, I also noticed gobe productive made the news. sweet.
    Now comes the important part. in a month, I'm switching over to a completely linux system, and I'm gonna need a replacement for Office. so who's it gonna be?:)

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  4. OpenOffice at work by vandan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We were using the StarOffice 6-beta release, but when I heard of the 31-3-02 timebomb in it, we moved to OpenOffice 641C. Of course now there is a patch to extend StarOffice, but we won't be needing it.
    The 641 build is quite stable and complete. Oh - except for that Australian dictionary. Maybe I should go make one...
    I'm looking forward to the proposed changes to the toolbars (look under the 'Todo' section on their site). Looks very nice. Maybe it will come with a performance improvement too. Hint, hint!!!

  5. Re:sadly, it doesn't matter how well it works by tzanger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The main thing that matters to most people in an MS Office replacement is how well it reads and writes MS Office files. And that's, unfortunately, a moving target.

    Agreed on both points. My experience with 641C (win and linux) is that it reads and writes Office97/2000 files with ease. Really large excel files it barfs on, but your normal .doc with graphics, "normal size" xls files, etc. all work great. I was really surpised at how well it writes the files, too.

  6. WordPerfect import filters by AntiNorm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WordPerfect import ability would really help.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  7. Re:sadly, it doesn't matter how well it works by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was disappointed in how StarOffice 6.0beta handled bullets when exported to MS Word format. And while I can appreciate that issue may not be trivial, still... the end result was unacceptable.


    So I turned to Open Office 641c. And to my suprise, bullets exported in an acceptable format. Not perfect. I would still like to see improvement in that area. But its close enough for me to continue using OO rather happily.