Slashdot Mirror


"Disposable" Cell Phone Actually Repackaged Nokia

ewhac writes "Hop-On.com apparently started distributing the first versions of their disposable/recyclable cell phones, which will offer 60 minutes for $30. Hop-On claims their proprietary technology makes this possible. However, the San Francisco Chronicle is reporting that, upon cracking open the phones, they found not the kind of disposable cell phone technology covered earlier on Slashdot, but a jury-rigged Nokia. When confronted, Hop-On CEO Peter Michaels dodged by saying the phones the Chronicle took apart were, "promotional samples only. They are not Hop-On production phones." The article also calls into serious question Hop-On's other claims, and also points out California revoked Hop-On's corporate status last month."

6 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. More pollution by yggdrazil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the point about disposable mobiles anyway? It's just more pollution. Less quality. It's just plain idiotic.

    There should be a big fee on disposable mobiles to cover the recycling costs of the stuff.

    Plus mobiles are terminals which do a lot more than voice telephony. This trend will only accellerate in the years to come.

  2. Terrorism by clark625 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disposable phones are perfect for a terrorist, drug dealer, or other criminal. Simply go to Wal-Mart ot Target, pay cash for the phone and the minutes, and leave. Or have one of your "associates" do the purchase so that you're not on the store cameras. Currently, someone has to use a credit card and pay some money to sign of for service--that's not difficult to do but does present some barrier.

    I'm not trying to troll here--it's just that a disposable phone is ideal for someone trying to remain anonymous and under the radar of the authorities. That's a huge advantage.

    Myself, I have thought that I would like a mobile phone--but I'm not willing to pay upwards of $150 for a phone plus the monthly contract. And I'm all about pre-paying because I don't plan to use the phone much anyways. A disposable phone with 60 minutes would likely last me a year. At that point, I think I should be allowed to toss the thing since I know many people who get new phones every year at the $300 price tag. I doubt much of this will ever see the light of day, though, since the possibilities for criminals are huge.

    --
    Long, cute, or funny Sigs are just another form of over compensation, used by geeks, nerdz, etc.
    1. Re:Terrorism by MoNickels · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everything can, and is, used by criminals. Grocery carts, street signs, road maps, mailboxes, elevators, stairs, 411, electricity, tap water, pens, pencils, water colors, lawnmowers, yard rakes, credit cards, checks, cash, coins, incense, books, the Internet, public transportation, libraries, televisions, radios, walkie-talkies, handerkerchiefs, laundromats, diners, off-ramps, on-ramps, overpasses, optometrists, public education, gas stations, restaurants, liquor stores, scissors, glue and tape.

      You jackass.

      --

      Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect

  3. Re:disposable cell phones by mpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It consisted of a thick "business card" phone -- a circuit printed on plastic and wrapped in paper, slightly larger than your average business card. The phone had about 60 minutes of talk time, couldn't receive calls, and had a single large button on one side. The idea was that you could buy a sheet of these phones for about $5-10 per, print your business card on them, and "burn" your own number into the phone. Pressing the button on the phone dialed that number.

    I don't see the point of this over a generic pre-pay mobile. This thing still needs to interface with the network and the time used had better not be recorded on the phone. Otherwise it can trivially be hacked into a free network access pass.

  4. Their Web Site by cjsnell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You think that they'd be embarassed to have this Web site up. Did you notice...

    - The "mock-up" phone on their front page is actually just a peice of Photoshop handiwork?

    - The bogus Time article. While I don't doubt that they made Time (it's amazing what $$ can buy you), their fake "page curl" effect that shows their product on page 3 is a bit much.

    - I love how, in the article, they credit the Hop-On CEO as the "inventor". Inventor of what? I'm sure he's hardly the first to think of a disposable cell phone. The technology is obviously not his, nor is it Hop-On's. What did he invent?

    - Is that Scooby-Doo rip-off kangaroo thing missing her lower jaw? Or is she just as dazed as the investors? Her joey looks pretty stunned by the whole mess.

    - Check out this page. Look at the "models" on the bottom left. It looks like they Photoshop'ed the phones into their hands.

    - I couldn't help but think, the "Our Future" link at the top should have lead to here.

  5. Hop-on 100% scam by jquirke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I initially was wondering if the US-based Hop-on was related to the Australian Hop-on.com.au.

    The Australian Hop-On.com.au advertised for months a free Internet service on the back of Taxis, except, it never came. Here is their website, don't bother going to it, it no longer exists.

    After going to the US-based Hop-on, I discovered it was in fact the same company, as their mascot was that Kangaroo, the same cartoon character that appeared on the Australian taxis.

    So, this didn't really surprise me to hear that their promised disposable phone was a fake after all.

    --jquirke