Microsoft Tech Specs Prohibit GPL Implementations
abartlet writes "As described in this Advogato entry, MS is trying to pull a swifty with their latest 'release' of their CIFS (the networked filesystem Samba implements) Technical Reference. The licence specifically prohibits any GPLed or (or LGPLed) program from implementing it, defining it as an 'IPR Impairing Licence'! Fortunately the CIFS community is about to release its own Technical Reference based on earlier MS documents and long experience in attempting to interoperate with the MS product." Microsoft's claim is completely ungrounded - nothing written by a third-party can take away Microsoft's intellectual property rights. But it makes a good (read: confusing to the general public) justification for preventing others from interoperating with their software.
It just goes on and on and on. It's like those people in the antitrust trial are lost in space, wasting vast amounts of time and effort dwelling over finer and finer points of legalese (which is exactly what Msft wants, splitting hairs indefinately) while the abuse of power goes on and on and on.
try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
Obviously he's not getting any advice from anybody.
"ungrounded" isn't even a word.
Perhaps he meant groundless? Or unFOUNDed.
Ugh is right.
B: (A) excluded, you STILL deserve mod points for getting the spellings of 'Wookiee' and 'Kashyyyk' right. Self-proclaimed Star Wars freaks who keep blowing 'Wookiee' get on my nerves...
GTRacer
- Yes, I do have better things to do, and No, I don't care
Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!