Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

When Looks Can Kill

Posted by michael on from the smoldering-glance dept.

Ben Sullivan writes "From the Los Angeles Times: "Test pilots here are flying with sophisticated helmets, resembling a bug's eye, that allow them to aim their weapons and sensors simply by looking at potential targets on the ground or in the air. The helmets, when coupled with a highly maneuverable new missile that is close to deployment, would enable fighter pilots to look over their shoulders and fire instantly at targets, a feat that until now has been matched only in science fiction movies." Development was done by San Jose-based Vision Systems International, a joint venture of defense electronics maker Rockwell Collins Inc. and Israeli's Elbit. Raytheon makes the sharp-turning AIM-9X missile."

9 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. About time! by vjlen · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Russians have had helmet mounted sights and versions of the Archer AAM that can come off the launch rail at absurd angles for versions of the Mig-29 and Su-27 for some time now. Coupled with an infrared search and track sensor, they can mount a passive attack, no radar warning at all.

    1. Re:About time! by singularity · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am not one to complain about people not reading the article, but this seems like a clear case of it. Almost all posts on this story so far have been about how the Soviets and the Apache helicoptor have had systems similar to this before.

      The article mentions the fact that the Soviets designed such a system years ago.

      The Apache system also only used a machine gun.

      This seems to be much more advanced however.The article mentions the ability to target ground targets for sateelite targetted missles. In addition, this system coupled with AA missles able to make very tight turns means that the pilot does not have to be behind the other plane in order to take down the target.

      As the Slashdot story says, the pilot would have the ability to *look over his shoulder* and still target and take out another plane. This would require an AA missle capable of making a reletively tight 180 degree turn and still be able to hit its target.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    2. Re:About time! by T-Punkt · · Score: 2, Informative

      And somewhat related:
      With the unification of Germany the Luftwaffe got some Fulcrums with AA-11 Archer missiles and noticed that it was superior to the current version of sidewinder missile they had (AIM-9L) in all ways (homing, maneuverability) and started with some other nations (Canada, Norway, Seden, Italy, Greece) devoloping a new missile called IRIS-T (AIM-120) which will work with a helmet sight like the AA-11 as well.

      Seems like the US of A is a little late here...

    3. Re:About time! by RKloti · · Score: 3, Informative

      NASA developed no such space pen. That is an urban legend.

    4. Re:About time! by Moofie · · Score: 3, Informative

      The AIM-120 is the best medium range missile in the world, and it is American (and widely licensed to our allies). It is a semi-active radar homing missile, meaning that it initially requires a radar fix from the mother aircraft to target the adversary. As it approaches the target, it activates its own radar for final intercept. It's a very smart bird, and is difficult for its target to detect.

      It also has a 100% combat launch to kill ratio.

      That's why the US hasn't been on the cutting edge of short-range missile development. They have been concentrating on improving their medium-range missile so that they never have to have a short-range fight, and then spending lots of money on pilot training.

      Not an ideal strategy, IMO, but it's been darn successful so far.

      IRIS-T is not the same thing. IRIS-T is a next-generation short-range missile, similar in capabilities to the AIM-9x.

      Incidentally, the major reason that the US has not employed helmet mounted sights is weight. The heavy helmets used by the Russians are dangerous to the pilot in an ejection, and it's not a risk the US has been willing to take. The next-generation lightweight helmets in development for the F-22 and JSF will solve this problem.

      So, yes, the US is sorta behind, but only in a very limited sense and for what I feel are good reasons.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  2. alredy been done... by sonicstorm · · Score: 1, Informative

    This isn't anything too ground-breaking, the Russian MiG-29 has had a similar system in operation for years now.

    1. Re:alredy been done... by JAZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the apache helicopter, been doing it for more than 10 years.

      --


      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -- Homer Simpson
  3. Re:Little too easy? by jpmkm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read the article -
    "When a target is in the display's bull's-eye, the pilot pushes a button to launch the missile."
    The helmet is just for aiming. You still push a button to launch.

  4. Re:Flares, Depth-Of-Field by jonnythan · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe this is helmet tracking, not eye tracking (similar to the Apache system).

    Point your head at the target, get it in the helmet visor-mounted HUD, lock, and fire.