Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

GameBoy Web Server

Posted by michael on from the why-ask-why dept.

Huma79 writes "Adrian O'Grady has successfully gotten TCP/IP and PPP working on his handheld Gameboy Advance for a web server. Pictures of the server running and a telnet session to it can be found at fivemouse.com."

15 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fpfpfpfp!

  2. You da man! by BerserkDog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I once made a mansion of toothpicks...it wasn't nearly as cool as O'Grady's Gameboy Advance, though...

  3. nfp by ObeyTheWerejackal · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    notfirstpost

  4. Re:People have too much time on their hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Ah, the mother fucking troll known as cscx. Incase you haven't noticed, your company (Microsoft) was found guilty of using its monopoly to crush its competition, that's why IE must go. Unless KDE has 80% of the market and take measures to prevent distros (or OEMs) from shipping alternate browsers such as mozilla, netscape or opera, there is no reason to remove konqueror.

    So quit bending over for your boss and get some common sense. That sig make you look stupid.

  5. Re:Uhhhhhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    "Offtopic"?

    Uh, just how? That was my first thought when I read the intro blurb.

  6. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Stupid fucking moderators with sheep mentality always follow the herd.

    First post must be moderated down, even if it is funny AND on-topic.

    You all suck. Fuck you all. Goodbye.

  7. Re:Uhhhhhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    If I had my mod points id mod up CSCX

    --Spike

  8. Re:Fuck all y'all bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    WHO THE fucks modearating!!! Pr0n King was modded up for a troll, but poor CSCX was modded down for a funny, ontopic comment!!!! NOTE TO META-MODERATORS: Whoever modded this must lose their priveliges!!

  9. Re:Uhhhhhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    That was modded down?

  10. Re:Fuck all y'all bitches! by Traxton1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Ahh yes, 320x240 pixelated pr0n. Why not just go here and look at some hardcore action? (It's not goatse.cx, I promise.)

    --
    Twitter.com/TrentonHyatt
  11. Re:wehavethewayout.com by Eberlin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Shhhhhh, when too many people find out, they'll switch to an X-Box server!!!!!!

  12. Re:Pays an homage to saint Linus... by dozing · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can you just imagine a Beowolf cluster of these?

    (I'm so sorry, but somone had to say it.)

    --
    Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
  13. Re:Fuck all y'all bitches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hey! Stop impersonating me. I am the only one allowed to reply anonymously when I'm pissed about moderation of my comments.

    --cscx

  14. Your Sig by scotch · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    If IE's Windows integration is a monopoly....

    You sig doens't make sense to me. Integration isn't a monopoly - I don't think anyone is claiming that it is. Microsft is the alleged monopoly. IE integration is an act which may or may not be illegal under the Sherman Act and other laws.

    I suggest changing your sig so it parses correctly.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  15. Re:But why? by alvi · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    If IE's Windows integration is a monopoly, then I'm all for the removal of Konqueror from KDE.

    Just a side note, completely OT: Are you aware that your signature is ridiculous? 'IE Windows integration' has nothing to do with 'monopoly'.